Well, if AI is always 10 years away it should be obvious to the nonAI that the R&D efforts have been heading in the wrong direction for the last 40 years. If the intent is to come up with something other than simulated AI, we need to try a radial tack.
If AI has been 10 years away for the last 40 years can you not assume it will always be 10 years out of reach if we stay on this course ?
Is there any sign that an unconventional approach might ever get enough support to be tested ?
What do you think of the shotgun approach used by Mother Nature ?
How do you rate the current efforts in AI development in terms of diversity ?
Is simulated AI scoring these comments ?
Well, if AI is always 10 years away it should be obvious to the nonAI that the R&D efforts have been heading in the wrong direction for the last 40 years. If the intent is to come up with something other than simulated AI, we need to try a radial tack.