You seem to be confused. You talk as if state known as "Europe" with its own legislation exists.
No such thing exists in reality. Europe is made of tens of different states, each with their own legislation. Some enshrine right to free speech, some go with concept of privileged speech instead.
I assume you advocate taking a risk of dying over killing someone in self defence so you can be consistent in "nobody has right to kill" complaint to include all situations?
You have no right to know about "criminal shit that was done" if person in question served their time and you don't have very specific special needs and people committed very limited array of crimes that carry high risk of recidivism.
See, that's the way our justice system works. If you commit a crime, we don't brand people with burning irons, or the modern google version of the same thing. Instead we let them do their time, and then work on reintegrating them into the society. Right to be forgotten in this context is a naturally occurring right that was simply removed by a private for profit company for its own benefit.
When a private entity decides to unilaterally remove natural right historically held by citizenry, that's time and place to hold a public debate on the issue and decide if this entity should be allowed to cause this level of societal damage to citizenry. In EU, the debate was in fact held, and the outcome is that only a very limited amount of such damage was found acceptable. Google's variant of branding people with burning iron for life was found to be unacceptable invasion of one's natural rights.
In this case, these are people who served their time, and in the past would have been allowed to try to rebuild their lives and become productive members of society.
In today's world, they're forever branded by a private enterprise, that is universally used for looking up names. The right to be forgotten is a very important thing to maintain society's ability to let private citizens actually do the time they owe to the society, and then be able to reintegrate.
Let me make this really simple. Google's actions increase recidivism risk and increase criminality on societal level in this particular instance.
No one cares about it on this small of a level. This isn't some big company, or some huge meaningful event. These people served their time. They shouldn't have it hang over them for the rest of their lives.
We must be talking about different things then. USB-OTG is just a protocol that enables a USB device to act as both master and slave on the same USB port.
Wires are obviously still required for connection.
Branding is not about partnership in any way, they don't need "design talent" that can't design a car where panels come together properly when they have far better design talent who can make cars that come together properly in less time and for less money, luxury market is not the key or even main target market for BYD as they're actually aiming to make electric popular among populace, not just the top earners.
With all that down, how exactly would Tesla be able to offer BYD any better export potential, that they couldn't get from literally any other company that is in US and actually has a distribution network?
Having watched most of the groups you list as I actually want to know what my political opponents think, your utter lack of even basic understanding of their platforms is baffling. You literally built a massive caricature of what you think these groups are, based on maybe seeing some mentally unstable individual rant somewhere.
All of the platforms you mention have far more complex ideologies then "kill/disappear/etc people we disagree with".
What would such partnership offer to BYD? It's better at batteries, it's better at vehicle building, it's better at scaling things up. Partnership is about offering each other something that other doesn't have. BYD has a lot of things that Tesla doesn't, but I struggle to think of what Tesla has that BYD doesn't that would be of any meaningful value to BYD and worth giving their competition access to things where they're massively ahead.
I quoted that as being a showcase of likely mental instability. When you have a good point as she does there, and you still manage to go off the deep end making it, it tells us something about you. Something far more meaningful than just parroting some crazy conspiracy theory.
It shows that you have enough intelligence to parse the message for coherence, but then still make it about you being the one persecuted, personally.
The day of idiots on slashdot. First I get accused of being an american, now I get accused of being a british. All because said couple of idiots cannot address the arguments I present, so all they can do is just fling shit in hope that of it will stick, down to thinking they can nail my nationality or ethnicity, and somehow use it against me as a weapon.
Stop. Get some help, before you end up like that woman did.
Have you seen that website yet? It's not something that most stable of a person would put together. You have everything from complaints about youtube written in a very angry tone, to conspiracy theories about her being attacked in real life because she has a nail stuck in her tyre, to anti-homosexual propaganda video and ravings about "destruction of family values".
She also comes off like she genuinely believes that she is targeted on a personal level by many people judging by that material.
I didn't disagree with her opinion on youtube's policy by the way. I actually mostly agree with her on all the main points of the policy itself. I just don't think youtube targeted her specifically. I think she got caught in the dragnet policing of anyone even remotely controversial that happened after the recent advertiser pullout from youtube.
Look through her website. It's linked in the OP. It's worth a few minutes of your time if you're interested in this case, before it gets nuked. Many youtube videos linked through it already are.
She's some kind of a hardcore vegan activist of Iranian origin. Has separate youtube channels for Turkish, Iranian and English audiences. Claims persecution from everyone from youtube to "anti-vegan animal business supporting criminals trying to harm me/kill me" (with picture of what look to be a nail stuck in a car's tyre, with tyre remaining inflated).
Huge message in the middle of the page on yellow background states the following:
BE AWARE! Dictatorship exists in all countries but with different tactics! They only care for personal short term profits & do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people, hiding the truth, manipulating science & everything, putting public mental & physical health at risk, abusing non-human animals, polluting environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism & sexual degeneration in the name of freedom,..... & turning people into programmed robots! "Make the lie big, Make it simple, Keep saying it, And eventually they will believe it" Adolf Hitler... There is no free speech in real world & you will be suppressed for telling the truth that is not supported by the system. Videos of targeted users are filtered & merely relegated, so that people can hardly see their videos!.There is no equal growth opportunity on YOUTUBE or any other video sharing site, your channel will grow if they want to!!!!!
Not what I would call the most stable individual in the world. Shame, she's actually quite a good looking woman, with no religious head covering at all in the pictures that are still up. Linking her to islamism based on just the headscarf is likely not an accurate description. Hardcore vegans on the other hand are well known for violently attacking anyone who opposes their views. Just ask the folks working in laboratories that conduct animal testing.
BYD is huge through. They build everything from buses to taxis.
It's always funny to watch the dick measurement contest between Tesla fans and critics when they talk volumes, as they never realise that there is actually an electric vehicle company that grows faster than Tesla (analytics suggest that it passed Tesla in revenue some time last year) and has none of the Tesla's "production issues" while apparently making far more vehicles, DIFFERENT vehicles on top of it, profitably. It's just Chinese, so they never hear about it.
Slashdot Mirror
You seem to be confused. You talk as if state known as "Europe" with its own legislation exists.
No such thing exists in reality. Europe is made of tens of different states, each with their own legislation. Some enshrine right to free speech, some go with concept of privileged speech instead.
I assume you advocate taking a risk of dying over killing someone in self defence so you can be consistent in "nobody has right to kill" complaint to include all situations?
You have no right to know about "criminal shit that was done" if person in question served their time and you don't have very specific special needs and people committed very limited array of crimes that carry high risk of recidivism.
See, that's the way our justice system works. If you commit a crime, we don't brand people with burning irons, or the modern google version of the same thing. Instead we let them do their time, and then work on reintegrating them into the society. Right to be forgotten in this context is a naturally occurring right that was simply removed by a private for profit company for its own benefit.
When a private entity decides to unilaterally remove natural right historically held by citizenry, that's time and place to hold a public debate on the issue and decide if this entity should be allowed to cause this level of societal damage to citizenry. In EU, the debate was in fact held, and the outcome is that only a very limited amount of such damage was found acceptable. Google's variant of branding people with burning iron for life was found to be unacceptable invasion of one's natural rights.
In this case, these are people who served their time, and in the past would have been allowed to try to rebuild their lives and become productive members of society.
In today's world, they're forever branded by a private enterprise, that is universally used for looking up names. The right to be forgotten is a very important thing to maintain society's ability to let private citizens actually do the time they owe to the society, and then be able to reintegrate.
Let me make this really simple. Google's actions increase recidivism risk and increase criminality on societal level in this particular instance.
No one cares about it on this small of a level. This isn't some big company, or some huge meaningful event. These people served their time. They shouldn't have it hang over them for the rest of their lives.
We must be talking about different things then. USB-OTG is just a protocol that enables a USB device to act as both master and slave on the same USB port.
Wires are obviously still required for connection.
Thank you for confirming my point.
Wires.
Not one that someone with your level of intelligence/investment in Tesla fanboying could understand, no.
Branding is not about partnership in any way, they don't need "design talent" that can't design a car where panels come together properly when they have far better design talent who can make cars that come together properly in less time and for less money, luxury market is not the key or even main target market for BYD as they're actually aiming to make electric popular among populace, not just the top earners.
With all that down, how exactly would Tesla be able to offer BYD any better export potential, that they couldn't get from literally any other company that is in US and actually has a distribution network?
Having watched most of the groups you list as I actually want to know what my political opponents think, your utter lack of even basic understanding of their platforms is baffling. You literally built a massive caricature of what you think these groups are, based on maybe seeing some mentally unstable individual rant somewhere.
All of the platforms you mention have far more complex ideologies then "kill/disappear/etc people we disagree with".
What would such partnership offer to BYD? It's better at batteries, it's better at vehicle building, it's better at scaling things up. Partnership is about offering each other something that other doesn't have. BYD has a lot of things that Tesla doesn't, but I struggle to think of what Tesla has that BYD doesn't that would be of any meaningful value to BYD and worth giving their competition access to things where they're massively ahead.
I quoted that as being a showcase of likely mental instability. When you have a good point as she does there, and you still manage to go off the deep end making it, it tells us something about you. Something far more meaningful than just parroting some crazy conspiracy theory.
It shows that you have enough intelligence to parse the message for coherence, but then still make it about you being the one persecuted, personally.
None of them. Most of these posts are too coherent and on topic to be posted by a bot. They're just stupid on merits of the discussion.
That was my point. Not the most stable person, because even when her message is on point, she goes off the rails with it.
That moment when you desperately try to play grammar nazi, and end up in your own death camp.
50 cent party on slashdot. I'm impressed, some of you can read english and even comprehend it to a very limited degree!
I already said this elsewhere, but it needs repeating for you.
Stop. Get some help before you end up like her.
I'll get my green face paint and nerf gun to look the part.
The day of idiots on slashdot. First I get accused of being an american, now I get accused of being a british. All because said couple of idiots cannot address the arguments I present, so all they can do is just fling shit in hope that of it will stick, down to thinking they can nail my nationality or ethnicity, and somehow use it against me as a weapon.
Stop. Get some help, before you end up like that woman did.
I didn't actually say that I disagree with her, because I don't disagree with her on key points of youtube's policy as it functions.
But there are ways to present that view that are reasonable, and then there's the way in which she presented it.
Have you seen that website yet? It's not something that most stable of a person would put together. You have everything from complaints about youtube written in a very angry tone, to conspiracy theories about her being attacked in real life because she has a nail stuck in her tyre, to anti-homosexual propaganda video and ravings about "destruction of family values".
She also comes off like she genuinely believes that she is targeted on a personal level by many people judging by that material.
I didn't disagree with her opinion on youtube's policy by the way. I actually mostly agree with her on all the main points of the policy itself. I just don't think youtube targeted her specifically. I think she got caught in the dragnet policing of anyone even remotely controversial that happened after the recent advertiser pullout from youtube.
Look through her website. It's linked in the OP. It's worth a few minutes of your time if you're interested in this case, before it gets nuked. Many youtube videos linked through it already are.
She's some kind of a hardcore vegan activist of Iranian origin. Has separate youtube channels for Turkish, Iranian and English audiences. Claims persecution from everyone from youtube to "anti-vegan animal business supporting criminals trying to harm me/kill me" (with picture of what look to be a nail stuck in a car's tyre, with tyre remaining inflated).
Huge message in the middle of the page on yellow background states the following:
BE AWARE! Dictatorship exists in all countries but with different tactics! They only care for .There is no equal growth opportunity on YOUTUBE or any other video sharing site,
personal short term profits & do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people,
hiding the truth, manipulating science & everything, putting public mental & physical health at risk,
abusing non-human animals, polluting environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism &
sexual degeneration in the name of freedom,..... & turning people into programmed robots!
"Make the lie big, Make it simple, Keep saying it, And eventually they will believe it" Adolf
Hitler... There is no free speech in real world & you will be suppressed for telling the truth that is not
supported by the system. Videos of targeted users are filtered & merely relegated, so that people can
hardly see their videos!
your channel will grow if they want to!!!!!
Not what I would call the most stable individual in the world. Shame, she's actually quite a good looking woman, with no religious head covering at all in the pictures that are still up. Linking her to islamism based on just the headscarf is likely not an accurate description. Hardcore vegans on the other hand are well known for violently attacking anyone who opposes their views. Just ask the folks working in laboratories that conduct animal testing.
China doesn't need Tesla. It has BYD, which does electric vehicles in China much better than Tesla ever could dream to do.
BYD is huge through. They build everything from buses to taxis.
It's always funny to watch the dick measurement contest between Tesla fans and critics when they talk volumes, as they never realise that there is actually an electric vehicle company that grows faster than Tesla (analytics suggest that it passed Tesla in revenue some time last year) and has none of the Tesla's "production issues" while apparently making far more vehicles, DIFFERENT vehicles on top of it, profitably. It's just Chinese, so they never hear about it.