If we can do good, let's do it. There is no "nature wants...". Nature doesn't want anything, if you want to antropomorphize it, you may say it's watching whats happening.
And inequality? Why not? Let one be the best runner and one be the best thinker... not everybody needs to have the same abilities. For more diverse abilities.
Maybe it's part of the problem, that we want to combine that many news sources. With paper you choose one and maybe another if somebody tells you there's a really interesting article. On the web you switch between 10.
without root access it is rocket science and will stay it. Of course you can freeze ram modules. This may work for 1 of 10 experiments under lab conditions. For a real case you either have some exploit (insecure firewire dma or similiar) or you won't be able to get RAM from the system.
http vs https in the Adressbar were never a good indicator. People do not want to know if its http or https, they want to know if its secure or not. And we nerds should acknowlege, that http, spdy, http2, gopher or ftp should be the same for a transport protocol and the user does not need to care, but if its ftp or ftps is important to him.
openvpn does per default no logging at all. It just has for each phase of connection some hooks, where scripts get data via environment variables. So you can for example add a connect hook, which logs external to internal ip or you can have a disconnect hook, which just logs internal ip to traffic in/out (thus enabling accounting per user). I know no vpn with traffic limit, because they do not want to log anything. And if you think about it... plausible saying you have nothing can spare you from a raid next time. Who seizes servers, when nothing's stored on them? So a vpn provider who logs despite saying they don't not only risks to lose all customers after a raid, but has even a longer investigation during the raid. And a reliable logging setup in that scale isn't free either. So if you're not renting a full honeypot you're probably secure. And that they do not cooperate is probably the reason why the data center was connected and not PP.
> Do you mean a pay-per-page paywall or a pay-per-month paywall? Not knowing which you meant, I shall take the time to answer both: I do not care at this level. That's up to the site, how they build their paywall and around what.
I only said, they will learn, how much money and how much efford their users are willing to invest for their content and then they can draw conclusions like not publishing online anymore or that the paywall model works for them or anything else. At least it's a honest conclusion than and not stuff like forcing ads on unwilling customers, trying to lie to the advertisers on how effective the ads may or may not be and so on.
At the moment the situation has tension between everyone. The user is forced to view ads, he opted out not only by telling his opinion, but even with massive technical measures. The site doesn't really care about the ads the user sees, but wants the advertiser to believe the users sees a lot of ads. What the advertiser really wants is a lot of sales (not views or clicks), but he thinks that showing the ads is important for that (but possible showing a lot less ads at the right places would be more useful). As the user doesn't care, the website owner is likely to want to inflate the number of ads while the advertiser has an incentive to claim that way less ads were shown, so he needs to pay less. That's a situation which isn't compfortable for advertiser or website owner and this mistrust leads to using ad networks, which promise to do some objective measuring and mediating the right ads to the right user. Which leads to a lot of ugly javascript which is served to the user, to avoid "click fraud" and a lot of tracking to try to serve the ads to the users, which make him buy stuff. And this leads to the user being annoyed about unresposible and tracking websites, so he installs an adblocker even for banners which would not be that annoying. So the ad situation is fucked up for all participants. But a paywall is a fair mechanism. You know what you pay for in a way you know it when buying a newspaper (you see headlines but do not read articles) and you decide if it's worth the price. The publisher needs to pay something in advance (writing articles isn't free, printing them isn't either, serving them may be a lot cheaper) and then sees how many people are paying for the work. And then they can optimize for good content, which is worth paying. Or maybe trash papers with a lot of gossip, which are bought as well. Build the model and time will show what's emerging from it.
Hey, a paywall is only fair. You will definitely learn, what's the worth of your content. And that's not cynic, as you may learn, that people will pay money. It's only cynic, because many people will learn, that their content is not worth any money, but replacable by other funny stuff as soon as they demand money (or even adblocker switched off).
You make a business relying on some service, which isn't granted by any contract to you. You just use the standard ToS of youtube and hope everything will be okay. And subject to change without prior notification and so on. Maybe you deserve whatever happens to you.
Next time: Search for some service, which makes a contract with you, make sure everything needed is in the contract and you reserved the needed rights for your content, marketing, etc. to you, they cannot arbitrary reject the ad money (what ads they choose is their problem) and so on. Then you have something, you can use to demand what's in the contract. May be a bit more costly than using a free service and just clicking "ads" to get money. But on the other hand, if your vlog is not hobby but business, it doesn't hurt to invest some money to get a lot of money back.
Nobody wants ads. Stop putting ads into your videos. Especially when you think your videos are important (hint: they aren't), you may want people to watch them. So do not scare people away from your important message, just to make a bit of money.
> Python has no problem with tab characters for indenting, as long as the source file consistently uses the tabs or spaces. You don't need to. You can indent one line with 1 space and the next one with 1 tab. If you want to, you can make debugging the hell for the next person, when the less indented 2-space line is logical indented to the 1-tab line before.
A sustainable smartphone is bad for sony, because people do not buy a new one. So they push a software, which only charges up to 80%, so people need a new one sooner than they've planned.
btw. the claim with 100% is bullshit for modern batteries, my latest nexus phone had an explicit hint, there is no need to discharge and recharge the battery, but most healthy is just to charge when needed.
If they really want sustainable phones, they should have batteries, which can be changed, again. Then people can buy a whole new battery for like 20 USD and keep their phone for up to 10 years, if they do not need to play the latest pokemon game.
Indeed, its not only about inventions, but analysis of things and discovering how stuff works.
But discovering how stuff works means like what are the parts of a atom. Not dissecting things, which are built before and you could just ask the builder. Else there is endless science. One team builds stuff and keeps it secret, the other team dissects it.
Keep this to the businesses. Let amazon prime video dissect netflix and keep it to science to find the best way to do the stuff, instead of just finding out the netflix way. If the netflix way IS the best way, you will find the same one.
And yet it works for all uses of bittorrent. Bittorrent was invented to distribute data without overloading a weak server and worked that good, that the filesharing community instantly adopted it. Of course, your upload won't be enough for someones download. But the upload of a few people may sponsor your download. And the tech is already there, see popcorntime (never used it myself, but a nice idea).
Every real scientist is embarrassed, when somebody claims that reversing secret data from companies is research. There is NOTHING researched there, everything was known, just not to you. Research is about discovering something new, not about trying to get somebody else' secrets.
Use your time and money for something useful. Stop tracing netflix servers, start inventing something on your own.
Slashdot Mirror
I will read some docs, thank you anyway.
If we can do good, let's do it. There is no "nature wants ...". Nature doesn't want anything, if you want to antropomorphize it, you may say it's watching whats happening.
And inequality? Why not? Let one be the best runner and one be the best thinker ... not everybody needs to have the same abilities. For more diverse abilities.
Maybe it's part of the problem, that we want to combine that many news sources. With paper you choose one and maybe another if somebody tells you there's a really interesting article. On the web you switch between 10.
hmm, vim doesn't complain, but it doesn't seem to work either -.-
without root access it is rocket science and will stay it. Of course you can freeze ram modules. This may work for 1 of 10 experiments under lab conditions. For a real case you either have some exploit (insecure firewire dma or similiar) or you won't be able to get RAM from the system.
http vs https in the Adressbar were never a good indicator. People do not want to know if its http or https, they want to know if its secure or not.
And we nerds should acknowlege, that http, spdy, http2, gopher or ftp should be the same for a transport protocol and the user does not need to care, but if its ftp or ftps is important to him.
*contacted.
openvpn does per default no logging at all. It just has for each phase of connection some hooks, where scripts get data via environment variables. So you can for example add a connect hook, which logs external to internal ip or you can have a disconnect hook, which just logs internal ip to traffic in/out (thus enabling accounting per user). I know no vpn with traffic limit, because they do not want to log anything. ... plausible saying you have nothing can spare you from a raid next time. Who seizes servers, when nothing's stored on them? So a vpn provider who logs despite saying they don't not only risks to lose all customers after a raid, but has even a longer investigation during the raid. And a reliable logging setup in that scale isn't free either.
And if you think about it
So if you're not renting a full honeypot you're probably secure. And that they do not cooperate is probably the reason why the data center was connected and not PP.
That's why your openvpn client checks the CA certificate of the server. Which is secured on the server by a strong passphrase and/or disk encryption.
perfect privacy are not amateurs.
> Do you mean a pay-per-page paywall or a pay-per-month paywall? Not knowing which you meant, I shall take the time to answer both:
I do not care at this level. That's up to the site, how they build their paywall and around what.
I only said, they will learn, how much money and how much efford their users are willing to invest for their content and then they can draw conclusions like not publishing online anymore or that the paywall model works for them or anything else. At least it's a honest conclusion than and not stuff like forcing ads on unwilling customers, trying to lie to the advertisers on how effective the ads may or may not be and so on.
At the moment the situation has tension between everyone. The user is forced to view ads, he opted out not only by telling his opinion, but even with massive technical measures. The site doesn't really care about the ads the user sees, but wants the advertiser to believe the users sees a lot of ads. What the advertiser really wants is a lot of sales (not views or clicks), but he thinks that showing the ads is important for that (but possible showing a lot less ads at the right places would be more useful).
As the user doesn't care, the website owner is likely to want to inflate the number of ads while the advertiser has an incentive to claim that way less ads were shown, so he needs to pay less. That's a situation which isn't compfortable for advertiser or website owner and this mistrust leads to using ad networks, which promise to do some objective measuring and mediating the right ads to the right user. Which leads to a lot of ugly javascript which is served to the user, to avoid "click fraud" and a lot of tracking to try to serve the ads to the users, which make him buy stuff. And this leads to the user being annoyed about unresposible and tracking websites, so he installs an adblocker even for banners which would not be that annoying.
So the ad situation is fucked up for all participants.
But a paywall is a fair mechanism. You know what you pay for in a way you know it when buying a newspaper (you see headlines but do not read articles) and you decide if it's worth the price. The publisher needs to pay something in advance (writing articles isn't free, printing them isn't either, serving them may be a lot cheaper) and then sees how many people are paying for the work. And then they can optimize for good content, which is worth paying. Or maybe trash papers with a lot of gossip, which are bought as well. Build the model and time will show what's emerging from it.
Do they allow tabs at all? .oO( python3 will never really start )
Hey, a paywall is only fair. You will definitely learn, what's the worth of your content. And that's not cynic, as you may learn, that people will pay money.
It's only cynic, because many people will learn, that their content is not worth any money, but replacable by other funny stuff as soon as they demand money (or even adblocker switched off).
So what?
You make a business relying on some service, which isn't granted by any contract to you. You just use the standard ToS of youtube and hope everything will be okay. And subject to change without prior notification and so on.
Maybe you deserve whatever happens to you.
Next time: Search for some service, which makes a contract with you, make sure everything needed is in the contract and you reserved the needed rights for your content, marketing, etc. to you, they cannot arbitrary reject the ad money (what ads they choose is their problem) and so on. Then you have something, you can use to demand what's in the contract.
May be a bit more costly than using a free service and just clicking "ads" to get money. But on the other hand, if your vlog is not hobby but business, it doesn't hurt to invest some money to get a lot of money back.
Nobody wants ads. Stop putting ads into your videos. Especially when you think your videos are important (hint: they aren't), you may want people to watch them. So do not scare people away from your important message, just to make a bit of money.
doesn't work in my vim ... are you sure its correct that way?
> Python has no problem with tab characters for indenting, as long as the source file consistently uses the tabs or spaces.
You don't need to. You can indent one line with 1 space and the next one with 1 tab.
If you want to, you can make debugging the hell for the next person, when the less indented 2-space line is logical indented to the 1-tab line before.
:set expandtab
A sustainable smartphone is bad for sony, because people do not buy a new one. So they push a software, which only charges up to 80%, so people need a new one sooner than they've planned.
btw. the claim with 100% is bullshit for modern batteries, my latest nexus phone had an explicit hint, there is no need to discharge and recharge the battery, but most healthy is just to charge when needed.
If they really want sustainable phones, they should have batteries, which can be changed, again. Then people can buy a whole new battery for like 20 USD and keep their phone for up to 10 years, if they do not need to play the latest pokemon game.
Yeah, because forbidding certian words (names) in free speech is a good thing, because ... err wait ... i will come up with a reason soon!
Scientists AND the people, who keep stuff hidden while they know its researched at the same time.
Indeed, its not only about inventions, but analysis of things and discovering how stuff works.
But discovering how stuff works means like what are the parts of a atom. Not dissecting things, which are built before and you could just ask the builder. Else there is endless science. One team builds stuff and keeps it secret, the other team dissects it.
Keep this to the businesses. Let amazon prime video dissect netflix and keep it to science to find the best way to do the stuff, instead of just finding out the netflix way. If the netflix way IS the best way, you will find the same one.
You may be paying with your bandwidth for a cheaper netflix for you.
And yet it works for all uses of bittorrent. Bittorrent was invented to distribute data without overloading a weak server and worked that good, that the filesharing community instantly adopted it.
Of course, your upload won't be enough for someones download. But the upload of a few people may sponsor your download.
And the tech is already there, see popcorntime (never used it myself, but a nice idea).
Every real scientist is embarrassed, when somebody claims that reversing secret data from companies is research. There is NOTHING researched there, everything was known, just not to you. Research is about discovering something new, not about trying to get somebody else' secrets.
Use your time and money for something useful. Stop tracing netflix servers, start inventing something on your own.
you saw the difficulty switch at top of the game? there is an option "impossible", which does what you would expect.