maybe you need to increase the greylist-period. Most bots run at dsl accounts, which means they will get a new ip approximate every 24h. When you require a period of 24h for unknown senders, they will not be able to resend it.
Of course only a possible solution, if you do not need to get your e-mails as soon as possible. But when you need to, you do not want to use greylisting at all.
and somewhere the money gets out of the system, there you can access the user behind it. of course, if you invest all the bitcoins in services, which are paid via bitcoin, you are on the safe side. But when you get really rich, you will want to buy something real with your money.
when its too much traffic, then you need to provide it yourself. But until the original link becomes invalid... why should it not be allowed to use the link for providing the source, and only hosting it yourself when the link finally becomes invalid.
you can sell your license of all software. This is usually ONE license. But for GPL software, you can sell the software, and you can sell it as often as you like. you just need to provide the sourcecode.
> but you have to realize that at Google, decisions are made primarily by engineers, for engineering reasons. Fully half of the employees are engineers, nearly all of the managers are engineers, and engineers' voices are the ones that carry the most weight and drive the decisions. [citation needed]
a vServer, where someone thinks its important to point out its private (which means not a machine with a lot of users, but a virtual machine just for you, even when the physical one is shared).
why not? inline pgp should be really easy, i do not know how smartphones affect signatures in the attachments, but when it causes trouble just use inline pgp and do not care if its e-mail, paper, or written to stone. it just has two clearly seperated parts, the message and the signature, which can be read by a pgp-binary.
dedicated ssl-ports have an advantage: its easy to manipulate a "STARTTLS" package to read "STARTTLx", then the server replies with "not supported" and most mailclients fall back to unencrypted traffic. When the port is dedicated for SSL, the mailclient will not fall back.
you think, when google links two computing centers, they use an unencrypted connection via internet? Either they have their own physical link, or they encrypt their data.
which was not fair at that time, too. You cannot compare some product, which just trashed all its history to try something new with matured products. KDE4 is good since 4.2 or some release in that time, and gnome3 will become good again, too. Mint is working on the needed extensions to make it gnome2 like, other extension authors are building extensions just to improve the gnome3 look&feel. just wait until they create some useful bundle and try this one.
then you're having enough time to do so. i often want to read the essence and thats it. And clicking on ads, then reading the advertised page, looking if there is something i could possible like.. would only be another distraction, which i am trying to avoid.
As Gnome3 and Unity are still very new and KDE 4.7 is a matured desktop nowadays, so its not fair. just wait for gnome 3.7 and it will be as nice as kde. remember kde 4.0? It was the biggest crap. since kde 4.2 its good again. And just like this, gnome3 will just need some time to become good again.
this is a problem, because if the website is not yet payed per click, they will be very soon, because the person buying the ad wants the ad-watcher not only to click, but to spend money at his site.
maybe you need to increase the greylist-period. Most bots run at dsl accounts, which means they will get a new ip approximate every 24h. When you require a period of 24h for unknown senders, they will not be able to resend it.
Of course only a possible solution, if you do not need to get your e-mails as soon as possible. But when you need to, you do not want to use greylisting at all.
and if they would accept it, the transaction of the car dealer giving you the car would reveal your identity in the bitcoin system.
and somewhere the money gets out of the system, there you can access the user behind it. of course, if you invest all the bitcoins in services, which are paid via bitcoin, you are on the safe side. But when you get really rich, you will want to buy something real with your money.
when its too much traffic, then you need to provide it yourself. But until the original link becomes invalid ... why should it not be allowed to use the link for providing the source, and only hosting it yourself when the link finally becomes invalid.
you can sell your license of all software. This is usually ONE license. But for GPL software, you can sell the software, and you can sell it as often as you like. you just need to provide the sourcecode.
> but you have to realize that at Google, decisions are made primarily by engineers, for engineering reasons. Fully half of the employees are engineers, nearly all of the managers are engineers, and engineers' voices are the ones that carry the most weight and drive the decisions.
[citation needed]
Scam is a big word. But chromium is just okay, thats the message.
hotspotshield is a VPN, not a VPS provider!
a vServer, where someone thinks its important to point out its private (which means not a machine with a lot of users, but a virtual machine just for you, even when the physical one is shared).
yourvz is having another offer like this. but their webinterface is broken and they are still fixing it ... so you get what you pay for.
> 1000 GB Bandwidth
Bandwith is measured in MB(it)/s, not in GB/MB
http://chromium.hybridsource.org/the-iron-scam
maybe you need a better mouse. or set your window controls to be bigger. I never accidentally hit the close button ...
or you need gnome3, without max/min buttons.
why not? inline pgp should be really easy, i do not know how smartphones affect signatures in the attachments, but when it causes trouble just use inline pgp and do not care if its e-mail, paper, or written to stone. it just has two clearly seperated parts, the message and the signature, which can be read by a pgp-binary.
dedicated ssl-ports have an advantage: its easy to manipulate a "STARTTLS" package to read "STARTTLx", then the server replies with "not supported" and most mailclients fall back to unencrypted traffic.
When the port is dedicated for SSL, the mailclient will not fall back.
you think, when google links two computing centers, they use an unencrypted connection via internet? Either they have their own physical link, or they encrypt their data.
afaik, mailservers CAN use TLS, when the remote server supports it.
rockmelt will be the same scam as iron.
which was not fair at that time, too. You cannot compare some product, which just trashed all its history to try something new with matured products. KDE4 is good since 4.2 or some release in that time, and gnome3 will become good again, too. Mint is working on the needed extensions to make it gnome2 like, other extension authors are building extensions just to improve the gnome3 look&feel. just wait until they create some useful bundle and try this one.
then you're having enough time to do so. i often want to read the essence and thats it. And clicking on ads, then reading the advertised page, looking if there is something i could possible like .. would only be another distraction, which i am trying to avoid.
As Gnome3 and Unity are still very new and KDE 4.7 is a matured desktop nowadays, so its not fair. just wait for gnome 3.7 and it will be as nice as kde. remember kde 4.0? It was the biggest crap. since kde 4.2 its good again. And just like this, gnome3 will just need some time to become good again.
nope, just use ddclient. where is your problem, when you're hosting your services, the additional ddclient cannot be a real problem.
xkcd has ads?
this is a problem, because if the website is not yet payed per click, they will be very soon, because the person buying the ad wants the ad-watcher not only to click, but to spend money at his site.
build an addon, which adds this like the DNT-Header.