that just cause Linux is now an official 'Top Threat' to MS, it does NOT mean that Linux is better. But maybe it will make developers work harder to make it better than windows.
andres
Dont flame me, im fragile
I know nothing about the debian Linux distributition. Can you please tell me the key points that seperate it from the RH's, and other distro's out there. Personally I am a Slackware kinna guy, but Debian just sounds kewler. So whats the diff, and since the creation of Debian Linux, how much do you think it has progressed.
The Windows design was really not a rip off of the early apple GUI's. Because Win3.1 was still based on a command line interface. And if Microshaft actually did steal the GUI from apple, then you caould say that Apple (Steve Jobs) stole the Mac GUI from Xerox, because he made a trip to the Xerox development place (forgot what it called) and saw their new GUI before he started development on an Apple GUI. So that means that everbody ripped off of Xerox... I have a 500mhz G4 at home, running MacOs 9, but I wish I had a 500mhz Pentium, just cause MacOS doesnt take advantage of its processor like Windows and Linux. And Apple doesnt have to worry about different motherboards and competitive chipsets and all that other geek stuff, cause they only have one singel platform to work on, so why isnt taking advantage of that, I dunno, maybe MacOS X will take care of it (MachTen). Yippee.
Slashdot Mirror
that just cause Linux is now an official 'Top Threat' to MS, it does NOT mean that Linux is better. But maybe it will make developers work harder to make it better than windows. andres Dont flame me, im fragile
I know nothing about the debian Linux distributition. Can you please tell me the key points that seperate it from the RH's, and other distro's out there. Personally I am a Slackware kinna guy, but Debian just sounds kewler. So whats the diff, and since the creation of Debian Linux, how much do you think it has progressed.
The Windows design was really not a rip off of the early apple GUI's. Because Win3.1 was still based on a command line interface. And if Microshaft actually did steal the GUI from apple, then you caould say that Apple (Steve Jobs) stole the Mac GUI from Xerox, because he made a trip to the Xerox development place (forgot what it called) and saw their new GUI before he started development on an Apple GUI. So that means that everbody ripped off of Xerox... I have a 500mhz G4 at home, running MacOs 9, but I wish I had a 500mhz Pentium, just cause MacOS doesnt take advantage of its processor like Windows and Linux. And Apple doesnt have to worry about different motherboards and competitive chipsets and all that other geek stuff, cause they only have one singel platform to work on, so why isnt taking advantage of that, I dunno, maybe MacOS X will take care of it (MachTen). Yippee.