This book, reviewed here, I think, seems to support IBM's theory. Basically, the act of our observation and our "will" can have an affect on the final state of a particle. Based on the information in this book, this idea seems quite feasible. btw, this type of setup would require
concentration
and focused intent to work. I think it would be near, if not truly, impossible for a device to actually read someone's mind based on the way their stream of consciousness affects some random particles. It's a matter of degree. Active input vs/ passive reception.
Slashdot Mirror
- concentration
and focused intent to work. I think it would be near, if not truly, impossible for a device to actually read someone's mind based on the way their stream of consciousness affects some random particles. It's a matter of degree. Active input vs/ passive reception.