I understand that the only way a bankruptcy court would be involved is because another court had entered the fray. I suspect that another court had granted one of the lenders the right to auction off the SITE, including the domain name. It was scheduled and DOM files the Motion to Dismiss claiming he had both domestic and international bidders on a date certain. Whether or not the price makes sense, he will be compelled to demonstrate to the court that he indeed did have those potential buyers.
"We're creating a revenue stream and monetizing the equivalent..."
What a surprise. As opposed to pursuing the protection claimed, my brethren offer their true motivation.
Thanks for the correction. My error. Respond instead of response.
I just saw this. This is not only original but funny. I gotta figure out a way to give you props.
I understand that the only way a bankruptcy court would be involved is because another court had entered the fray. I suspect that another court had granted one of the lenders the right to auction off the SITE, including the domain name. It was scheduled and DOM files the Motion to Dismiss claiming he had both domestic and international bidders on a date certain. Whether or not the price makes sense, he will be compelled to demonstrate to the court that he indeed did have those potential buyers.
"We're creating a revenue stream and monetizing the equivalent..." What a surprise. As opposed to pursuing the protection claimed, my brethren offer their true motivation.
The budget cuts at NASA apparently keep them earthbound and working on earth crawlers