Full Disclosure: I work for a small publisher.
In terms of actual stores dedicated to selling books, there are fewer and fewer of them as time goes by. And it's not just the small guys, Borders got taken out too. To be clear, there's an economic argument to be made that this is a good thing but let's at least be clear about one thing: Amazon has a very real monopoly on print and electronic books.
While publishers will come and go over time the idea that authors will publish their own books shows a lack of experience actually dealing with real authors. Sure, some have the talent, desire, and resources to do so. However, that vast majority of authors we deal with do not want to prepare their books for market and then have to deal with retailers. Further, publishers are partially in the business of risk taking by offering up payment upfront to authors for works they haven't completed yet. Authors tend to be comforted knowing that they'll get $X now for signing the contracts and $Y later when they deliver the manuscript regardless of actually making a single sale. Again, some authors are willing to take that risk and it will pay off but not many.
So sure, Amazon could take on those roles but that doesn't just magically remove teat suckers. Unless you want unedited and un-styled walls of text someone's going to have to edit the damn thing and someone with an eye for a design needs to make it look half-way appealing. Those people aren't likely to do so for free. I'm sure Amazon could come into the market though and push those costs down and economically that'd be great. However, speaking long term, how long is that going to last? If Amazon has a monopoly on publishing in addition to distribution then what makes you think they'll continue with razor-thin margins?
The latest version of FileMaker is about as close as it gets. You can put it into a table mode that allows you to add/remove/rename column/fields at will.
Yea, I made one... just one... database in Base for Christmas cards which means it gets used/updated once a year. After two years it corrupted itself and was unrecoverable. Went to the forums, send the file off to some kind soul who confirmed it was borked.
So yea... hard to recommend Base as a serious contender.
Define 'would suit best home usage'. If you have 20 TB of data on a RAID running on a server in your home then I'm not sure the term 'home usage' really applies.
LTO-5 which stores 1.5TB natively can be had for under $1,500: http://www.newegg.com/Product/... LTO-5 tapes are $30: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...
No one is suspending any constitutional rights unless you feel searching people at the border is unreasonable. If you'd like to disagree on that point then so be it but I can't think of a more reasonable situation in which to be searched. Further, I suspect terrorism is not really the biggest concern at the border... that's more of a TSA thing. From my experience they are far more concerned with the more common trafficking of drugs, firearms, humans, or other contraband.
The answer to your question is yes, they would absolutely search a briefcase. I'm not sure what would make you think otherwise. I cross the Canadian/US land border several times a year with the full knowledge that if the border agent wants to tear my car apart bolt-by-bolt he can do so. Once done, they'd give me the OK and leave me with a pile of car parts.
I'm pretty big on civil liberties, and stories like this don't exactly make me comfortable, but at the end of the day the border guys have a tough job. Hundreds of thousands of people entering the country, they get a minute or two to decide if something is amiss. Should they have unlimited powers? No. However, I think there's a case to be made that if you want to enter a country you are not entitled to due-process in it's entirety.
In terms of it being a fourth amendment issue... I'm not sure it's unreasonable to be searched when entering a country... it seems pretty standard across the world. Electronics make it feel far move invasive, sure, but the base concept of being able to search people entering the country seems pretty sound.
I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with you there. I work for a mid-size publisher, just checked out YTD figures, and Amazon has a clear monopoly in both print and e-book. Further, Amazon knows this and acts accordingly. I'm sure the big publishers have a different relationship and more leverage but there isn't a lot of negotiating with Amazon at this point. They will sell and indeed have sold our e-books at below their cost as loss leaders since they can make it up in other items while dedicated booksellers can't.
If you use a program like SCCM, SCE, EmminantWare/SolarWinds, Secunia, Local Update Publisher (plug: my OSS alternative), or any other similar program that allows you to publish your own packages through the WSUS system you will also need to worry about this. For some time the default certificate that gets created was 512 bits and will become invalid with this update. Check with your vendor to see what remedy they suggest. One of the recent updates to the WSUS API bumped this default cert creation to 2048 bits but that won't help existing users.
I work for a very small publisher and there are a couple of reasons.
First and foremost, we don't want to do retail. Our core competence is finding authors with good ideas and bringing those ideas to market in the form of books. Second, Amazon has an existing monopoly and dictate the terms to us... no the other way around. We can't afford to not sell our books via Amazon due to that monopoly and if we were to undercut their prices they would simply stop selling our product.
Think about it from your own perspective as a consumer. Do you want to have to use Google to browse hundreds or thousands of publisher website to find books you want or do you just want to do a search on Amazon that is guaranteed to find the book if it exists?
I work for a publisher and I agree with you regarding DRM. However, even if we offered DRM-free books for a few bucks less on our own website it wouldn't make a lick of difference? Why? Because Amazon. They have a monopoly in online book retail and e-books via the Kindle. The vast majority of the market would continue to purchase books through Amazon because it has every publisher's book, most people don't give a damn about DRM, and they just want to buy books on their Kindle. It wouldn't help that Amazon would happily dump our products to push us out of the retail market or outright refuse to sell our products if we offered it for less.
How are you going to grab market share from a company that has, can, and will dump product? Amazon's practical monopoly on internet book retail and e-books via the Kindle is in itself a huge barrier to entry. Starting a Amazon competitor from nothing would not be easy by a long shot for a whole hosts of reasons. If you think it's a slam dunk then by all means... go for it.
I work for a publisher so I am obviously biased. Self publishing has and can work for people, no doubt about it. However, you have to be the kind of author who wants to get your book edited, designed, and promoted. Maybe you're the diamond in the rough that not only has great ideas but can also write down that idea clearly, have perfect grammar, know the ins-and-outs of designing a book interior and cover, is great at marketing, and are willing to risk months of work without any guarantee of a return. If so, you stand to make a lot of money... or lose everything. If you are an already established author these risk diminish significantly.
You are correct. However, Amazon has dumped product in the past and there's little reason to believe that they won't do so again. Sure, there's laws against that but that won't help the thousand of retailers who are not Apple whose main revenue is based on books. By the time it's all figured out they're long dead. This of course is capitalism at work so you may feel free to applaud their closure but don't complain when Amazon uses their monopoly to screw the consumer.
As many others; we have tried. But there are hundreds, if not thousands of publishers with millions of titles available and Amazon already has a practical monopoly on online book retail and e-books.
Again, you clearly do not understand the market. Our customers force us to sell via Amazon; that is where they want to purchase our books. We do sell to Walmart and Target although they use intermediary buyers. We are also working on our own online delivery but that won't make a lick of difference. Amazon already has the monopoly on internet book retail and e-books and we are not likely to rival them in any meaningful way. Nor do we want to; we just want to publish books.
Amazon maintains their own inventory for some titles and orders singles from publishers for others. Publishers don't care about Amazon's profits, they care about the other customers that Amazon can and will wipe out via dumping our product.
Why should you care? Well; if you're not particularly worried about having high-quality and relevant manuscripts available then I guess you need not. While there are authors who are or could be successful eschewing a typical publisher there are far more who would prefer to spend time doing what they love and are good at: writing. They also enjoy being paid an advance and thus being assured income regardless of how their books sells.
Feel free to rejoice in Amazon's complete dominance of the retail and publishing market should that happen. Just don't complain that without competitors Amazon leverages that monopoly to maintain itself, to increase profits via pricing, and offer a lower quality product.
You greatly misunderstand the way small publishers interact with Apple and Amazon. They dictate the terms to us, not the other way around. I'm not in sales but from what I gather both Amazon and Apple have restrictions on how much we are allowed to charge. If memory serves, no more than the lowest priced physical equivalent.
No, we were not. There are hundreds if not thousands of publishers and if there was collusion going on no one gave us a call to get in on the deal. When we deal with Amazon and Apple the terms our dictated to us, not the other way around.
I'm not defending what the big 5 publishers did; I'm just explaining the likely outcome of allowing Amazon to dump their products.
So, you'll be replaced with lighter, more flexible, more competitive entities that do "editing, promoting, designing, and selling" and focus on competitive digital distribution.
The OP suggests that publishing model is obsolete and good riddance with publishers. So what he is suggesting is to get rid of publishers who take manuscripts, process them, and deliver them to market. You then suggest they be replaced with entities that do the same thing. The entities you describe already exist and they have a name: publishers. Will they have to adapt to the market? Yes,and those that hope to survive must. Would the market be better off if there were no publishers willing to risk author advances, process manuscripts, and deliver them to the market? I believe so, yes.
Quite right, price fixing is bad, although I'm not entirely convince that's what was going on here. At the very least, I work for a small publisher and if there was collusion going no one called us to get in on the deal.
You are also correct, this is capitalism at work. In this case it will enable Amazon to dump product and kill competition. If you want to make the case that this is as it should be then so be it. As both a publisher and a consumer I would prefer to have choice in where I purchase my books.
And too bad for the authors and customers as well. You will lose out on the voice of authors who wish to write but can't be arsed with the details or risk of bringing their manuscript to market.
I believe the term your looking for is oligopoly. You have the choice of a monopoly of the retailer or a oligopoly of the big 5 publishers.
I would argue the oligopoly is preferable to the monopoly due to barrier of entry. There are hundreds if not thousands of smaller publishers that might not rival the oligopoly in terms of size but we can remain profitable and every once and a while hit it big with a best seller. Amazon is already entrenched as a practical monopoly and I just don't see how any sort of small upstart is going to overcome that. Small publishers can and do exist in the existing oligopoly but small retail outlets will not with Amazon's ability to dump product.
I work for a publisher; it's not Apple's profit margin that we're worried about. It's the hundreds of other smaller retail customers that provide diversity to our customer base. Amazon has, can, and will dump products and that is detrimental to our smaller customers who do not have other revenue streams. If you think retailers are doing just fine I would point you to Borders who, nearly right up to the point they failed, were one of our largest customers. You can make an argument that this is simply how it should be and that's fine but as a publisher we would like to see a diverse range of sellers rather than just Amazon and a bit of Apple on the side.
Slashdot Mirror
Full Disclosure: I work for a small publisher. In terms of actual stores dedicated to selling books, there are fewer and fewer of them as time goes by. And it's not just the small guys, Borders got taken out too. To be clear, there's an economic argument to be made that this is a good thing but let's at least be clear about one thing: Amazon has a very real monopoly on print and electronic books. While publishers will come and go over time the idea that authors will publish their own books shows a lack of experience actually dealing with real authors. Sure, some have the talent, desire, and resources to do so. However, that vast majority of authors we deal with do not want to prepare their books for market and then have to deal with retailers. Further, publishers are partially in the business of risk taking by offering up payment upfront to authors for works they haven't completed yet. Authors tend to be comforted knowing that they'll get $X now for signing the contracts and $Y later when they deliver the manuscript regardless of actually making a single sale. Again, some authors are willing to take that risk and it will pay off but not many. So sure, Amazon could take on those roles but that doesn't just magically remove teat suckers. Unless you want unedited and un-styled walls of text someone's going to have to edit the damn thing and someone with an eye for a design needs to make it look half-way appealing. Those people aren't likely to do so for free. I'm sure Amazon could come into the market though and push those costs down and economically that'd be great. However, speaking long term, how long is that going to last? If Amazon has a monopoly on publishing in addition to distribution then what makes you think they'll continue with razor-thin margins?
The latest version of FileMaker is about as close as it gets. You can put it into a table mode that allows you to add/remove/rename column/fields at will.
Yea, I made one ... just one ... database in Base for Christmas cards which means it gets used/updated once a year. After two years it corrupted itself and was unrecoverable. Went to the forums, send the file off to some kind soul who confirmed it was borked.
So yea ... hard to recommend Base as a serious contender.
Define 'would suit best home usage'. If you have 20 TB of data on a RAID running on a server in your home then I'm not sure the term 'home usage' really applies.
LTO-5 which stores 1.5TB natively can be had for under $1,500: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...
LTO-5 tapes are $30: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...
No one is suspending any constitutional rights unless you feel searching people at the border is unreasonable. If you'd like to disagree on that point then so be it but I can't think of a more reasonable situation in which to be searched. Further, I suspect terrorism is not really the biggest concern at the border ... that's more of a TSA thing. From my experience they are far more concerned with the more common trafficking of drugs, firearms, humans, or other contraband.
The answer to your question is yes, they would absolutely search a briefcase. I'm not sure what would make you think otherwise. I cross the Canadian/US land border several times a year with the full knowledge that if the border agent wants to tear my car apart bolt-by-bolt he can do so. Once done, they'd give me the OK and leave me with a pile of car parts. I'm pretty big on civil liberties, and stories like this don't exactly make me comfortable, but at the end of the day the border guys have a tough job. Hundreds of thousands of people entering the country, they get a minute or two to decide if something is amiss. Should they have unlimited powers? No. However, I think there's a case to be made that if you want to enter a country you are not entitled to due-process in it's entirety. In terms of it being a fourth amendment issue ... I'm not sure it's unreasonable to be searched when entering a country ... it seems pretty standard across the world. Electronics make it feel far move invasive, sure, but the base concept of being able to search people entering the country seems pretty sound.
I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with you there. I work for a mid-size publisher, just checked out YTD figures, and Amazon has a clear monopoly in both print and e-book. Further, Amazon knows this and acts accordingly. I'm sure the big publishers have a different relationship and more leverage but there isn't a lot of negotiating with Amazon at this point. They will sell and indeed have sold our e-books at below their cost as loss leaders since they can make it up in other items while dedicated booksellers can't.
If you use a program like SCCM, SCE, EmminantWare/SolarWinds, Secunia, Local Update Publisher (plug: my OSS alternative), or any other similar program that allows you to publish your own packages through the WSUS system you will also need to worry about this. For some time the default certificate that gets created was 512 bits and will become invalid with this update. Check with your vendor to see what remedy they suggest. One of the recent updates to the WSUS API bumped this default cert creation to 2048 bits but that won't help existing users.
I work for a very small publisher and there are a couple of reasons. First and foremost, we don't want to do retail. Our core competence is finding authors with good ideas and bringing those ideas to market in the form of books. Second, Amazon has an existing monopoly and dictate the terms to us ... no the other way around. We can't afford to not sell our books via Amazon due to that monopoly and if we were to undercut their prices they would simply stop selling our product.
Think about it from your own perspective as a consumer. Do you want to have to use Google to browse hundreds or thousands of publisher website to find books you want or do you just want to do a search on Amazon that is guaranteed to find the book if it exists?
I work for a publisher and I agree with you regarding DRM. However, even if we offered DRM-free books for a few bucks less on our own website it wouldn't make a lick of difference? Why? Because Amazon. They have a monopoly in online book retail and e-books via the Kindle. The vast majority of the market would continue to purchase books through Amazon because it has every publisher's book, most people don't give a damn about DRM, and they just want to buy books on their Kindle. It wouldn't help that Amazon would happily dump our products to push us out of the retail market or outright refuse to sell our products if we offered it for less.
How are you going to grab market share from a company that has, can, and will dump product? Amazon's practical monopoly on internet book retail and e-books via the Kindle is in itself a huge barrier to entry. Starting a Amazon competitor from nothing would not be easy by a long shot for a whole hosts of reasons. If you think it's a slam dunk then by all means ... go for it.
I work for a publisher so I am obviously biased. Self publishing has and can work for people, no doubt about it. However, you have to be the kind of author who wants to get your book edited, designed, and promoted. Maybe you're the diamond in the rough that not only has great ideas but can also write down that idea clearly, have perfect grammar, know the ins-and-outs of designing a book interior and cover, is great at marketing, and are willing to risk months of work without any guarantee of a return. If so, you stand to make a lot of money ... or lose everything. If you are an already established author these risk diminish significantly.
You are correct. However, Amazon has dumped product in the past and there's little reason to believe that they won't do so again. Sure, there's laws against that but that won't help the thousand of retailers who are not Apple whose main revenue is based on books. By the time it's all figured out they're long dead. This of course is capitalism at work so you may feel free to applaud their closure but don't complain when Amazon uses their monopoly to screw the consumer.
As many others; we have tried. But there are hundreds, if not thousands of publishers with millions of titles available and Amazon already has a practical monopoly on online book retail and e-books.
Again, you clearly do not understand the market. Our customers force us to sell via Amazon; that is where they want to purchase our books. We do sell to Walmart and Target although they use intermediary buyers. We are also working on our own online delivery but that won't make a lick of difference. Amazon already has the monopoly on internet book retail and e-books and we are not likely to rival them in any meaningful way. Nor do we want to; we just want to publish books.
Amazon maintains their own inventory for some titles and orders singles from publishers for others. Publishers don't care about Amazon's profits, they care about the other customers that Amazon can and will wipe out via dumping our product.
Why should you care? Well; if you're not particularly worried about having high-quality and relevant manuscripts available then I guess you need not. While there are authors who are or could be successful eschewing a typical publisher there are far more who would prefer to spend time doing what they love and are good at: writing. They also enjoy being paid an advance and thus being assured income regardless of how their books sells. Feel free to rejoice in Amazon's complete dominance of the retail and publishing market should that happen. Just don't complain that without competitors Amazon leverages that monopoly to maintain itself, to increase profits via pricing, and offer a lower quality product.
Apparently, because people keep purchasing them. There is a very clear market for new product.
You greatly misunderstand the way small publishers interact with Apple and Amazon. They dictate the terms to us, not the other way around. I'm not in sales but from what I gather both Amazon and Apple have restrictions on how much we are allowed to charge. If memory serves, no more than the lowest priced physical equivalent.
No, we were not. There are hundreds if not thousands of publishers and if there was collusion going on no one gave us a call to get in on the deal. When we deal with Amazon and Apple the terms our dictated to us, not the other way around. I'm not defending what the big 5 publishers did; I'm just explaining the likely outcome of allowing Amazon to dump their products.
So, you'll be replaced with lighter, more flexible, more competitive entities that do "editing, promoting, designing, and selling" and focus on competitive digital distribution.
The OP suggests that publishing model is obsolete and good riddance with publishers. So what he is suggesting is to get rid of publishers who take manuscripts, process them, and deliver them to market. You then suggest they be replaced with entities that do the same thing. The entities you describe already exist and they have a name: publishers. Will they have to adapt to the market? Yes,and those that hope to survive must. Would the market be better off if there were no publishers willing to risk author advances, process manuscripts, and deliver them to the market? I believe so, yes.
Quite right, price fixing is bad, although I'm not entirely convince that's what was going on here. At the very least, I work for a small publisher and if there was collusion going no one called us to get in on the deal. You are also correct, this is capitalism at work. In this case it will enable Amazon to dump product and kill competition. If you want to make the case that this is as it should be then so be it. As both a publisher and a consumer I would prefer to have choice in where I purchase my books.
And too bad for the authors and customers as well. You will lose out on the voice of authors who wish to write but can't be arsed with the details or risk of bringing their manuscript to market.
I believe the term your looking for is oligopoly. You have the choice of a monopoly of the retailer or a oligopoly of the big 5 publishers. I would argue the oligopoly is preferable to the monopoly due to barrier of entry. There are hundreds if not thousands of smaller publishers that might not rival the oligopoly in terms of size but we can remain profitable and every once and a while hit it big with a best seller. Amazon is already entrenched as a practical monopoly and I just don't see how any sort of small upstart is going to overcome that. Small publishers can and do exist in the existing oligopoly but small retail outlets will not with Amazon's ability to dump product.
I work for a publisher; it's not Apple's profit margin that we're worried about. It's the hundreds of other smaller retail customers that provide diversity to our customer base. Amazon has, can, and will dump products and that is detrimental to our smaller customers who do not have other revenue streams. If you think retailers are doing just fine I would point you to Borders who, nearly right up to the point they failed, were one of our largest customers. You can make an argument that this is simply how it should be and that's fine but as a publisher we would like to see a diverse range of sellers rather than just Amazon and a bit of Apple on the side.