Haven't these people used encyclopedias before? They didn't have fancy bells and whistles (Britannica, for example, was quite plain) but they did their job just fine - knowledge repositories. I don't see why the virtual, editable version should be any different.
So it's either the incompetent HR department lackeys don't know the meaning of patience, or the guy did something really terrible to warrant 10,000 pages of defamatory results. Both for seven years.
I don't think getting rid of autocomplete would solve either of those.
Slashdot Mirror
Haven't these people used encyclopedias before? They didn't have fancy bells and whistles (Britannica, for example, was quite plain) but they did their job just fine - knowledge repositories. I don't see why the virtual, editable version should be any different.
So it's either the incompetent HR department lackeys don't know the meaning of patience, or the guy did something really terrible to warrant 10,000 pages of defamatory results. Both for seven years.
I don't think getting rid of autocomplete would solve either of those.