First I have to say that there isn't such thing as perfect chess game because You can't make a chess game without any mistakes. The computer (currently) can't play perfectly because than on each step it will have to culaculate all the possibly steps and sutuations that any step can make and this will take a lot of time (A) and lot of memory will be needed (B) time is not always avaible in chess games and on all the computers in the world there isn't enough memory for that even not enough for two steps. Another thing, this is not mission for Distributed.NET because they working using brute-force method and as I have already wrote there is not enough time and memory for that mission. Lets hope that computer technology will never be so high that A Perfect Chess game will take place, because othervise the game of Chess won't be interesting anymore.
Lets take for example my best friend that has PS: He bought it to play games like Tekken, NFS3 and more. I'm presenting his as a general user, I'm asking myself for what will he need PS Documentation Project? Well the answer is clear: He doesn't need it at all, because as the most of PS users (I don't counting the induviduals that bought PS just to find what in the box and how can they hack/fix/overcloak/destroy it) he bought PS with only one purpose and the purpose is: To play games. I understand that the Documentation wasn't made for users like that but is it good to write a very fat Documentation that almost won't be used? I know that some people will say "YES" but if they right, why don't we start writing Documentation for any program that anyone makes using the most simple programming languages even thought there are lot of apps of that type we make documentation to each and each prgram. My question here is does it costs the job?
The problem is that RH is the most common distribution that is used by newbies, you can't tell a newbiew something like: "Stop using RH, because of people like you no software is done for other Linux distributions, you better start using Mandrake (Options: Slackware, Debian, Corel, S.u.S.E. and etc.)". AFAIK RH is most user friendly but least fixable, advanced and useful.
Slashdot Mirror
First I have to say that there isn't such thing as perfect chess game because You can't make a chess game without any mistakes. The computer (currently) can't play perfectly because than on each step it will have to culaculate all the possibly steps and sutuations that any step can make and this will take a lot of time (A) and lot of memory will be needed (B) time is not always avaible in chess games and on all the computers in the world there isn't enough memory for that even not enough for two steps. Another thing, this is not mission for Distributed.NET because they working using brute-force method and as I have already wrote there is not enough time and memory for that mission. Lets hope that computer technology will never be so high that A Perfect Chess game will take place, because othervise the game of Chess won't be interesting anymore.
Lets take for example my best friend that has PS: He bought it to play games like Tekken, NFS3 and more. I'm presenting his as a general user, I'm asking myself for what will he need PS Documentation Project? Well the answer is clear: He doesn't need it at all, because as the most of PS users (I don't counting the induviduals that bought PS just to find what in the box and how can they hack/fix/overcloak/destroy it) he bought PS with only one purpose and the purpose is: To play games. I understand that the Documentation wasn't made for users like that but is it good to write a very fat Documentation that almost won't be used? I know that some people will say "YES" but if they right, why don't we start writing Documentation for any program that anyone makes using the most simple programming languages even thought there are lot of apps of that type we make documentation to each and each prgram. My question here is does it costs the job?
The problem is that RH is the most common distribution that is used by newbies, you can't tell a newbiew something like: "Stop using RH, because of people like you no software is done for other Linux distributions, you better start using Mandrake (Options: Slackware, Debian, Corel, S.u.S.E. and etc.)". AFAIK RH is most user friendly but least fixable, advanced and useful.