I'll let you in on a little secret: Competent investigators save more lives. The way you get competent investigators is by having them follow the rules instead of taking shortcuts. When it comes to being exposed, human problems are the weak links far more often than tech problems.
There's not anything close to a reasonable tradeoff here. It's not going to make criminals easier to catch, and it will enable a massive amount of crime.
I would suspect that it would generally be better all around for some kind of discounted exchange, especially if we start putting forth measures to increase the salvage from recycling electronics.
As for CPU performance drops due to inherent security flaws, that's a bit of a tougher question. I think that the only example we have right now is too muddled by a monopolistic control on the market to have a satisfactory solution.
You missed the scare quotes around "liberals," indicating that they were not truly representative of liberals, just that they superficially adopt some positions that don't interfere with their business.
I did read the memo, and my takeaway was that he was making the liberal argument, whether he knew it or not, but it fell on deaf ears because Google is only liberal on the surface, not ACTUALLY liberal. That's why his suggestion for non-discriminatory ways to improve diversity included creating a better work-life balance, because men tends towards high status, while women tend towards living decent lives.
Again, Damore may have ultimately had bad intentions, but he addressed the root problems of the real issue, and nobody wants to talk about that. People are too stuck on their preconceptions, just like you assumed that by using liberal perjoratively that I was against the ideas of liberalism, while you ignored the fact that I called management full of shit, while implying that the business model was broken.
As someone who is knowledgeable enough on a number of relevant subjects to understand the problems with management in our society, as well as the various metrics of abuse where men have higher tolerance (such as the number of hours of sleep needed, or the level of body fat one can function at), the obvious conclusion to draw from the data he presented is that if Google really wants to improve diversity, they will change their management structure to welcome women instead of trying to find the outliers that are able to handle the high levels of abuse.
My takeaway form it was that it was a biting criticism of how management and certain technical positions under modern "capitalism" is so hostile that it strongly favors men, who are generally more willing to accept endless abuse.
Of course, rich "liberals" hate having to actually have a discussion that concludes that management is full of shit, so they assumed that he was claiming what was "broken" was women, not the business model.
It's possible that Damore did intend to attack women, but who the fuck cares what he really thinks? His "manifesto" is more powerful that way, and Google will actually solve some problems if they were to interpret it that way.
You can blame the food industry while blaming the regulation authority, especially since there's a very high chance that we've got enough regulatory capture that treating them as separate entities doesn't make sense.
But one of the pathways this bacteria used was breaking down trehalose into glucose, which it could then use. If that's the case, then table sugar would likely have the same problem, unless I'm missing something.
You are missing the point. What is being compared isn't the likelihood of a backdoor, it's WHO has access to the backdoor. An American typically has more to worry about from the NSA than from Chinese intelligence
He very explicitly advocated war crimes during the campaign (kill their families). War crimes are standard operating procedure in the US, and the way to change that is to have high standards.
No, Trump is the least popular president ever. Had he not been running against Clinton, he wouldn't have had a chance. Although I expect the Dems to search America for the only person that could lose an election in 2020, because they are immune to awareness of their voter base.
Obama expanded our wars into five other countries without an additional AUMF, plus he continued the existing wars. You can try and slice out an Obama exception, but it's more sensible to just have high standards. In fact, I'd argue that they should be higher. Any head of state starts a war, they die. If the war was necessary, then they should be willing to sacrifice themselves, and it really puts a damper on that whole military-industrial complex when war has a price for the leadership.
What is "wrong with me" is that I see dipshits like you obsessed over seeing a blurry shadow of a drop of corruption, when there is an ocean of corruption in 8K available. If you think what Trump has done regarding Russia is treason, and you are intelligent enough to recognize that a corporation can be just as much as threat as a nation state, then you'd have to conclude that the rivers should be flowing with the blood of our domestic oligarchs. And I wouldn't disagree.
But you are obsessed with a fraction of the real issues, because you're too stupid to realize that they are pointing to the only sliver of corruption that doesn't instantly damn them as well. Trump goes down easy if you aren't invested in protecting the status quo, and the corruption within it that allowed Trump to win in the first place.
Damning only Trump is a much harder battle, and gets less accomplished, so there's no reason that our political goals should be as unambitious as yours.
Trump is a constant liar. He's pathologically incapable of a lot of basic functions. He also has a hard-on for strong-men types, which includes Putin. However, there is far more evidence that his policies are bad, harmful, and enrich the donor class, than of ties to Russia. Bannon called it already. The Trump administration will be taken down for financial crimes like money laundering instead of the Russia bullshit the Clintonites have been selling.
I think that politicians tend to be more well behaved when death threats are on the table. The main problem is that there is so much collusion between politicians and our media that the motivations for the death threats are misplaced. If Paul Ryan expected armed angry hordes when he cuts off medical care, or just for failure to get America a modern healthcare system, he'd be better at his job.
Okay, how about the fact that he's arming (or at least planning to arm) neo-Nazis in the Ukraine to fight Russia?
You keep thinking that I'm naive, but my scenario is far scarier than your penny ante bullshit. I just don't believe the narrative that was crafted by the Clinton administration to hide their own Russian ties, focusing instead on the real problems, which include nuclear war with North Korea.
Maybe it's because Russia didn't "hack the election," which slashdot should be able to understand. The voting machines are vulnerable, but they are too fragmented for any serious efforts to be reliable. The voters were all within the margin of error, and there is no evidence of voting machines being hacked.
What we do have evidence of from Russia is stuff that's happened in every election ever, as long as the tech has been around, with similar permutations happening with older tech. Standard operating procedure. And yes, standard operating procedure is creepy as hell, but that's not how Trump got elected. Trump got elected because Clinton shit the bed and ran on the status quo.
Now, if the concern trolls were actually worried about Russian interference, they'd make it tougher for Russia to accomplish their goals. One of the most consistently stated goal for Russian campaigns is to "undermine faith in our democracy." You are furthering that goal by spreading this propaganda, while you could counter that goal by throwing the party leaders in jail for corruption, and electing politicians that don't whore the public's resources out for their donors.
But there's no money in that, and the powerful people don't want it, so they ramble about a bunch of incoherent crap trying cover the fact that Trump didn't win, Clinton lost.
I think we do need Trump to meet such an end, because humanity needs to rid itself of the 'king' mentality, and actions speak louder than words. War crimes should be a capital offense, and Trump is definitely a war criminal, along with Obama and Dubya.
And puh-leaze he got permission for his Syrian bomb dropping photo op from Putin who also approved Trump Tower Moscow.
Oh, you mean he bombed an important ally of Russia, which was fighting ISIS, but warned the Russian troops because directly attacking Russian troops could immediately lead to WWIII? You are too fucking stupid to converse with if you are calling that treasonous.
No, internal threats are almost always a bigger concern than external threats. His tax bill harms America more than not having enough ambassadors. And again, I WANT TRUMP TO BE EXECUTED. The competent Trump opponents focus on things that aren't Russia, because they are competent.
I'm not saying there are no Russian ties to Tillerson. He's an oil baron. Russia has oil. There are going to be ties.
The point is that we should be concerned over his very clear ties to the oil industry, instead of trying to paint a stupid Russia narrative that is going to inherently apply to an oil baron.
Remember when we used to bitch during the Bush years about how oil was driving our foreign policy? Now, it's as much literally true as can be possible, outside of nominating a 55-gallon oil drum. But do I EVER hear talk about that? No, just the Russia bullshit.
Again, I want Donald Trump to be executed. I am not an apologist, I'm just against idiocy and the clearly manufactured consent behind this narrative.
Because he cares about MONEY and POWER, not nationality, just like everyone in politics. Plus, he has to actually have a pro-Russia stance that is against US interests in order to be a traitor. Instead, he's come closer to starting WWIII with Russia by bombing Syria, just so Brian Williams will jerk him off on air.
I believe Trump should be executed. I also believe that the Russian meddling bullshit is just a red herring.
A foreign hostile adversary wants only to harm our country.
Hostile foreign countries don't matter that much anymore, at least outside of threatening nuclear conflicts, and the Clintonites are willing to push us into nuclear war with Russia instead of admitting that they ran a shit campaign. Hostile corporations are a far bigger problem, be they foreign or domestic, and are a far bigger problem even regarding Trump.
A traitor harms our country on behalf of the hostile foreign adversary which controls his actions, as Russia controls Trump.
Russia doesn't control Trump. Trump doesn't even control Trump. Russia did not want Trump. Nobody wants Trump, not even Trump. Russia wanted NOT-Clinton, and they had quite a few legitimate reasons for it.
Pull your head out of your ignorant goddamn ass. You idiots, who can't realize that the organizational nature of political power has fundamentally changed, are so caught up in your nationalism bullshit that you whine about Russia ties when the CEO of EXXON-GODDAMN-MOBIL is touted as a Russian agent instead of an oil baron, while Trump assuages his detractors' concerns just a bit by arming the anti-Russian neo-Nazis in Ukraine.
I believe that Trump should face the death penalty. I think that most of his administration should as well, as well as the majority of congress. But I'm not dumb enough to not realize that the Russia talk has always been a distraction from the real issues that created Trump in the first place.
No, Trump is a crook, not a traitor, and a crook is worse 99% of the time. Quit tilting at the Russia windmills and slay the actual dragons of corruption in this country. But of course, the establishment doesn't want to do that, because they are crooks as well, and don't want to risk exposing themselves. Smarter crooks, but crooks nonetheless.
I'm pretty sure that merely uploading the white noise to youtube would create enough artifacts that it would be a different permutation of white noise.
More importantly, the similarity of all accurately labeled white noise is probably within the scope of Youtube's aggressive content ID system. So, the assumption of direct copying is unfounded.
Also, regarding originality in regards to copyright, it was in contrast to "effort," not "creativity." Feist v. Rural ruled that the white pages phone books were not eligible for copyright because they are not original, even though they took a lot of work. It's an uphill battle arguing that white noise is more original than the phone book.
Slashdot Mirror
I'll let you in on a little secret: Competent investigators save more lives. The way you get competent investigators is by having them follow the rules instead of taking shortcuts. When it comes to being exposed, human problems are the weak links far more often than tech problems.
There's not anything close to a reasonable tradeoff here. It's not going to make criminals easier to catch, and it will enable a massive amount of crime.
I would suspect that it would generally be better all around for some kind of discounted exchange, especially if we start putting forth measures to increase the salvage from recycling electronics.
As for CPU performance drops due to inherent security flaws, that's a bit of a tougher question. I think that the only example we have right now is too muddled by a monopolistic control on the market to have a satisfactory solution.
Oh, God! We've finally made contact with an alternate universe!
You missed the scare quotes around "liberals," indicating that they were not truly representative of liberals, just that they superficially adopt some positions that don't interfere with their business.
I did read the memo, and my takeaway was that he was making the liberal argument, whether he knew it or not, but it fell on deaf ears because Google is only liberal on the surface, not ACTUALLY liberal. That's why his suggestion for non-discriminatory ways to improve diversity included creating a better work-life balance, because men tends towards high status, while women tend towards living decent lives.
Again, Damore may have ultimately had bad intentions, but he addressed the root problems of the real issue, and nobody wants to talk about that. People are too stuck on their preconceptions, just like you assumed that by using liberal perjoratively that I was against the ideas of liberalism, while you ignored the fact that I called management full of shit, while implying that the business model was broken.
As someone who is knowledgeable enough on a number of relevant subjects to understand the problems with management in our society, as well as the various metrics of abuse where men have higher tolerance (such as the number of hours of sleep needed, or the level of body fat one can function at), the obvious conclusion to draw from the data he presented is that if Google really wants to improve diversity, they will change their management structure to welcome women instead of trying to find the outliers that are able to handle the high levels of abuse.
My takeaway form it was that it was a biting criticism of how management and certain technical positions under modern "capitalism" is so hostile that it strongly favors men, who are generally more willing to accept endless abuse.
Of course, rich "liberals" hate having to actually have a discussion that concludes that management is full of shit, so they assumed that he was claiming what was "broken" was women, not the business model.
It's possible that Damore did intend to attack women, but who the fuck cares what he really thinks? His "manifesto" is more powerful that way, and Google will actually solve some problems if they were to interpret it that way.
You can blame the food industry while blaming the regulation authority, especially since there's a very high chance that we've got enough regulatory capture that treating them as separate entities doesn't make sense.
But one of the pathways this bacteria used was breaking down trehalose into glucose, which it could then use. If that's the case, then table sugar would likely have the same problem, unless I'm missing something.
You are missing the point. What is being compared isn't the likelihood of a backdoor, it's WHO has access to the backdoor. An American typically has more to worry about from the NSA than from Chinese intelligence
He very explicitly advocated war crimes during the campaign (kill their families). War crimes are standard operating procedure in the US, and the way to change that is to have high standards.
No, Trump is the least popular president ever. Had he not been running against Clinton, he wouldn't have had a chance. Although I expect the Dems to search America for the only person that could lose an election in 2020, because they are immune to awareness of their voter base.
Obama expanded our wars into five other countries without an additional AUMF, plus he continued the existing wars. You can try and slice out an Obama exception, but it's more sensible to just have high standards. In fact, I'd argue that they should be higher. Any head of state starts a war, they die. If the war was necessary, then they should be willing to sacrifice themselves, and it really puts a damper on that whole military-industrial complex when war has a price for the leadership.
Easiest path would be war crimes.
What is "wrong with me" is that I see dipshits like you obsessed over seeing a blurry shadow of a drop of corruption, when there is an ocean of corruption in 8K available. If you think what Trump has done regarding Russia is treason, and you are intelligent enough to recognize that a corporation can be just as much as threat as a nation state, then you'd have to conclude that the rivers should be flowing with the blood of our domestic oligarchs. And I wouldn't disagree.
But you are obsessed with a fraction of the real issues, because you're too stupid to realize that they are pointing to the only sliver of corruption that doesn't instantly damn them as well. Trump goes down easy if you aren't invested in protecting the status quo, and the corruption within it that allowed Trump to win in the first place.
Damning only Trump is a much harder battle, and gets less accomplished, so there's no reason that our political goals should be as unambitious as yours.
Trump is a constant liar. He's pathologically incapable of a lot of basic functions. He also has a hard-on for strong-men types, which includes Putin. However, there is far more evidence that his policies are bad, harmful, and enrich the donor class, than of ties to Russia. Bannon called it already. The Trump administration will be taken down for financial crimes like money laundering instead of the Russia bullshit the Clintonites have been selling.
Yeah, Bush, Obama, and Trump are all war criminals, as were most of their cabinets, and thus all deserve the death penalty.
I think that politicians tend to be more well behaved when death threats are on the table. The main problem is that there is so much collusion between politicians and our media that the motivations for the death threats are misplaced. If Paul Ryan expected armed angry hordes when he cuts off medical care, or just for failure to get America a modern healthcare system, he'd be better at his job.
Okay, how about the fact that he's arming (or at least planning to arm) neo-Nazis in the Ukraine to fight Russia?
You keep thinking that I'm naive, but my scenario is far scarier than your penny ante bullshit. I just don't believe the narrative that was crafted by the Clinton administration to hide their own Russian ties, focusing instead on the real problems, which include nuclear war with North Korea.
Maybe it's because Russia didn't "hack the election," which slashdot should be able to understand. The voting machines are vulnerable, but they are too fragmented for any serious efforts to be reliable. The voters were all within the margin of error, and there is no evidence of voting machines being hacked.
What we do have evidence of from Russia is stuff that's happened in every election ever, as long as the tech has been around, with similar permutations happening with older tech. Standard operating procedure. And yes, standard operating procedure is creepy as hell, but that's not how Trump got elected. Trump got elected because Clinton shit the bed and ran on the status quo.
Now, if the concern trolls were actually worried about Russian interference, they'd make it tougher for Russia to accomplish their goals. One of the most consistently stated goal for Russian campaigns is to "undermine faith in our democracy." You are furthering that goal by spreading this propaganda, while you could counter that goal by throwing the party leaders in jail for corruption, and electing politicians that don't whore the public's resources out for their donors.
But there's no money in that, and the powerful people don't want it, so they ramble about a bunch of incoherent crap trying cover the fact that Trump didn't win, Clinton lost.
Oh, you mean he bombed an important ally of Russia, which was fighting ISIS, but warned the Russian troops because directly attacking Russian troops could immediately lead to WWIII? You are too fucking stupid to converse with if you are calling that treasonous.
No, internal threats are almost always a bigger concern than external threats. His tax bill harms America more than not having enough ambassadors. And again, I WANT TRUMP TO BE EXECUTED. The competent Trump opponents focus on things that aren't Russia, because they are competent.
I'm not saying there are no Russian ties to Tillerson. He's an oil baron. Russia has oil. There are going to be ties.
The point is that we should be concerned over his very clear ties to the oil industry, instead of trying to paint a stupid Russia narrative that is going to inherently apply to an oil baron.
Remember when we used to bitch during the Bush years about how oil was driving our foreign policy? Now, it's as much literally true as can be possible, outside of nominating a 55-gallon oil drum. But do I EVER hear talk about that? No, just the Russia bullshit.
Again, I want Donald Trump to be executed. I am not an apologist, I'm just against idiocy and the clearly manufactured consent behind this narrative.
Because he cares about MONEY and POWER, not nationality, just like everyone in politics. Plus, he has to actually have a pro-Russia stance that is against US interests in order to be a traitor. Instead, he's come closer to starting WWIII with Russia by bombing Syria, just so Brian Williams will jerk him off on air.
I believe Trump should be executed. I also believe that the Russian meddling bullshit is just a red herring.
Hostile foreign countries don't matter that much anymore, at least outside of threatening nuclear conflicts, and the Clintonites are willing to push us into nuclear war with Russia instead of admitting that they ran a shit campaign. Hostile corporations are a far bigger problem, be they foreign or domestic, and are a far bigger problem even regarding Trump.
Russia doesn't control Trump. Trump doesn't even control Trump. Russia did not want Trump. Nobody wants Trump, not even Trump. Russia wanted NOT-Clinton, and they had quite a few legitimate reasons for it.
Pull your head out of your ignorant goddamn ass. You idiots, who can't realize that the organizational nature of political power has fundamentally changed, are so caught up in your nationalism bullshit that you whine about Russia ties when the CEO of EXXON-GODDAMN-MOBIL is touted as a Russian agent instead of an oil baron, while Trump assuages his detractors' concerns just a bit by arming the anti-Russian neo-Nazis in Ukraine.
I believe that Trump should face the death penalty. I think that most of his administration should as well, as well as the majority of congress. But I'm not dumb enough to not realize that the Russia talk has always been a distraction from the real issues that created Trump in the first place.
No, Trump is a crook, not a traitor, and a crook is worse 99% of the time. Quit tilting at the Russia windmills and slay the actual dragons of corruption in this country. But of course, the establishment doesn't want to do that, because they are crooks as well, and don't want to risk exposing themselves. Smarter crooks, but crooks nonetheless.
I'm pretty sure that merely uploading the white noise to youtube would create enough artifacts that it would be a different permutation of white noise.
More importantly, the similarity of all accurately labeled white noise is probably within the scope of Youtube's aggressive content ID system. So, the assumption of direct copying is unfounded.
Also, regarding originality in regards to copyright, it was in contrast to "effort," not "creativity." Feist v. Rural ruled that the white pages phone books were not eligible for copyright because they are not original, even though they took a lot of work. It's an uphill battle arguing that white noise is more original than the phone book.