Pay closer attention, this is a "morality" play. They are equating Global Warming with some sort of Moral Agreement to institute worldwide socialism with a global elite governance that divides up the loot (taxes) and spread them to "under privileged" countries, like China and India.
Never mind this was a Treaty ("You can't leave!!!") that was never ratified by the Senate, because Obama was playing semantics with wording ("Accord"). Either it is a Treaty (power of law) or it is an "Accord" (No power to accomplish anything). And if it is an Accord, with no teeth behind it, then what harm is there not pretending it is something it is not (treaty)???
It is much easier, when you put the GDP/per capita ratios out there. The US has one of the Highest GDP/Per Capita ratios in the world. And if you add in CO2 to the equation, we actually use less per CO2/GDP/PerCapita. But then again, that kind of equation doesn't fit the globalist agenda of making everyone in America as poor as the poorest in North Korea. Because that is the equality they are looking for.
Yup, because China is building out huge amount of coal burning plants to fuel its economic expansion, and the US has shuttered them. China wins when it doesn't have to really do anything while handcuffing the US.
I'm sorry? Myopia got you? Everyone is filled with hyperbole, especially the news media. The fact that you think ONLY Fox and Breitbart are doing it (or at least "worse" than CNN, MSNBC etc) then it shows you aren't paying attention.
The Democrat Playbook is filled with "Killing babies, raping dogs, and eating kittens" for every minor cut to a minor program that is duplicated by three other programs elsewhere. They do it, because "fear mongering" isn't just about "Terrorists".
This is why, you see them parrot the "Trump is going to ruin the planet" mantra, while ignoring the coal burning plant build out in China.
Worker: The sign says "Do not use" Manager: I don't care what it says, flip the switch Worker: That's a really stupid idea Manager: Do it, or you're fired Worker: Manager: Well, now you really screwed things up, you're fired!
There are two ways to engineer power for a datacenter. 1) You can engineer for maximum efficiency/lowest cost or you can engineer for redundancy/max safety. Penny Pinchers always choose the former, and IT guys usually want the latter.
Here is the real equation: Cost * likelihood of of catastrophic event. If you think 100,000 * a.0000001 chance of catastrophe, you err on the side of savings. On the other hand, if you think $25 * 100.00 chance of catastrophe, you err on the side of cost.
My guess, is that they didn't account for business losses when plugging in that (obviously over simplified) formula. This is why you leave penny pinching idiots out of the decision making, because when all you see is cost, and don't properly evaluate the catastrophic losses in event of disaster, then you're just an idiot that nobody should listen to.
I get that there are budgets and such, but here is my one question I (IT guy) ask the "business" decision makers: If you lost everything, how much would it cost you? Most people undervalue the data inside the databases and documents, because they have no way of quantifying how much all that data is worth.
Data, is the biggest unaccounted for asset of a business.
I'll rent a shitty movie, or worse, wait to see it on TV, which makes it shittier by slicing and dicing to fit with the commercials and the 3 hour time slot. And most of the time, it is not worth it even then.
Great movies don't always stand the test of time, good movies usually do, and rarely do bad movies last forever. Most movies are forgettable. And people have figured that out. It isn't worth $50 date night for a bad movie, bad popcorn and flat soda.
The problem with Toxic Feminism is that it views as toxic anything masculine, unless it is a woman with balls the size of Bayonne. The problem I have with this, is that it doesn't ever embrace the true strengths of women as virtuous on their own merit. The unreal expectation that a woman can bear the part of a man, with exceptional strength, skill and agility is part of the problem, short of the superhero genre.
There are rare exceptions, where a strong woman character fits the script, the genre and doesn't go overboard with the Machismo Woman character. I think the original Alien movie makes a great example. But the whole movie wasn't about a bad ass woman going to town, it was about a normal woman going to town. The power of two "mother" figures out to protect their "young". Classic play missed by the feminists, and douchebag men equally, because they are overtly looking at things completely wrong.
There are lots of other strong characters built around women, and it is sad to see them play second fiddle to Wolverine movies. Not that those were unwatchable, but Black Widow (Avengers) probably needs her own movie, where we can see her full skillset, not just her badass fighting techniques.
The fact that ONE MAN can join (Obama) or unjoin (Trump) a treaty should concern everyone. But hey, Fuck the Constitution requiring the Senate to approve treaties when we can hyperbole tyranny into acceptance!
We are equal. Born Equal in value as a human being. Not in Abilities, drive, skill, mental abilities. VALUE.
Technology helps smooth over the rough edges of abilities if made available to those with less ability, and more drive. A paraplegic can plow a field today, because of technology not available 130 years ago. His value as a human being remains unchanged.
But that isn't exactly how we view others. We don't value them as humans, but only as a complex calculation based on what they can do for society. We are trained that our value is based on how we contribute to society, when the reality is, we should be trained to see the innate value of each human by themselves.
Comedy Gold right there, not the severed head, the hypocritical "apology" and all the people saying "I forgive her" who won't forgive anybody with an (R) after their name for anything.
practically everyone who spoke about election predictions from the DNC had Clinton winning the Electoral College easily.
It wasn't just the DNC, it was just about every poll out there. Trump didn't have a chance. There is a video montage of all the people saying "Trump will never be president". All of them MSM, and DC inbreds, not just the DNC and Hillary campaigns.
The stunned pundits from NBC to CNN and heck, even FOX was surprised. The data people everywhere failed. Except Trumps, who spent time and money on states he was pretty much "wasting" his time and effort on, states he won.
The vast majority of voters voted for Hillary. She won the popular vote.
But that isn't exactly how the Presidential Elections are counted, and Hillary didn't campaign except in states that she was winning, securing the... popular vote. Trump dumped a ton of money, and spent time in rust belt talking their language, and Hillary was avoiding the public like the plague it was with her health issues.
In the end, a lot people felt less uncomfortable with Trump than with Clinton, especially in key states, and that led to the stunned media / DC complex on Election night. Watching Wolf Blitzer try and find "votes" on the big board for Hillary was comedic gold.
But yeah, it was the Russians hacking the elections and Trump Collusion and DNC data people and*...
Notice, it was never Hillary being a terribly flawed candidate, caught cheating with the DNC, MSM against Bernie, and hiding out trying to coast in for the win.
Your best argument is the Android / iOS vs Microsoft Phone iterations during the last 10 years.
I know a guy, swore by Windows Phone, up and until the day that he couldn't get a replacement. He went with iPhone after that, and still complains. Won't use Android, for whatever reason.
My smart devices were, Palm III, Blackberry, Android. Back in the day of the Palm Pilot, I wished a phone had its capability for calendar / contacts / email... I wish I could go back and invent the thing.
Google, is actually on its second, and a third is in production. It bought Android and had a version in development before it did. They have another one in development now.
*Recent Experience in parsing a JSON into a stack of arrays in order to execute a simple loop to display on LED strands. While the Arduino could parse the JSON, and get it stacked into the arrays correctly, there was barely enough RAM to load the libraries needed to drive the LEDs. Eventually was able to get it to run, but gnarly ugly code.
Slashdot Mirror
agreement critically and avoid the emotionalism
Pay closer attention, this is a "morality" play. They are equating Global Warming with some sort of Moral Agreement to institute worldwide socialism with a global elite governance that divides up the loot (taxes) and spread them to "under privileged" countries, like China and India.
Never mind this was a Treaty ("You can't leave!!!") that was never ratified by the Senate, because Obama was playing semantics with wording ("Accord"). Either it is a Treaty (power of law) or it is an "Accord" (No power to accomplish anything). And if it is an Accord, with no teeth behind it, then what harm is there not pretending it is something it is not (treaty)???
It is much easier, when you put the GDP/per capita ratios out there. The US has one of the Highest GDP/Per Capita ratios in the world. And if you add in CO2 to the equation, we actually use less per CO2/GDP/PerCapita. But then again, that kind of equation doesn't fit the globalist agenda of making everyone in America as poor as the poorest in North Korea. Because that is the equality they are looking for.
Yup, because China is building out huge amount of coal burning plants to fuel its economic expansion, and the US has shuttered them. China wins when it doesn't have to really do anything while handcuffing the US.
I'm sorry? Myopia got you? Everyone is filled with hyperbole, especially the news media. The fact that you think ONLY Fox and Breitbart are doing it (or at least "worse" than CNN, MSNBC etc) then it shows you aren't paying attention.
The Democrat Playbook is filled with "Killing babies, raping dogs, and eating kittens" for every minor cut to a minor program that is duplicated by three other programs elsewhere. They do it, because "fear mongering" isn't just about "Terrorists".
This is why, you see them parrot the "Trump is going to ruin the planet" mantra, while ignoring the coal burning plant build out in China.
Worker: The sign says "Do not use"
Manager: I don't care what it says, flip the switch
Worker: That's a really stupid idea
Manager: Do it, or you're fired
Worker:
Manager: Well, now you really screwed things up, you're fired!
There are two ways to engineer power for a datacenter. 1) You can engineer for maximum efficiency/lowest cost or you can engineer for redundancy/max safety. Penny Pinchers always choose the former, and IT guys usually want the latter.
Here is the real equation: Cost * likelihood of of catastrophic event. If you think 100,000 * a .0000001 chance of catastrophe, you err on the side of savings. On the other hand, if you think $25 * 100.00 chance of catastrophe, you err on the side of cost.
My guess, is that they didn't account for business losses when plugging in that (obviously over simplified) formula. This is why you leave penny pinching idiots out of the decision making, because when all you see is cost, and don't properly evaluate the catastrophic losses in event of disaster, then you're just an idiot that nobody should listen to.
I get that there are budgets and such, but here is my one question I (IT guy) ask the "business" decision makers: If you lost everything, how much would it cost you? Most people undervalue the data inside the databases and documents, because they have no way of quantifying how much all that data is worth.
Data, is the biggest unaccounted for asset of a business.
I'll rent a shitty movie, or worse, wait to see it on TV, which makes it shittier by slicing and dicing to fit with the commercials and the 3 hour time slot. And most of the time, it is not worth it even then.
Great movies don't always stand the test of time, good movies usually do, and rarely do bad movies last forever. Most movies are forgettable. And people have figured that out. It isn't worth $50 date night for a bad movie, bad popcorn and flat soda.
The problem with Toxic Feminism is that it views as toxic anything masculine, unless it is a woman with balls the size of Bayonne. The problem I have with this, is that it doesn't ever embrace the true strengths of women as virtuous on their own merit. The unreal expectation that a woman can bear the part of a man, with exceptional strength, skill and agility is part of the problem, short of the superhero genre.
There are rare exceptions, where a strong woman character fits the script, the genre and doesn't go overboard with the Machismo Woman character. I think the original Alien movie makes a great example. But the whole movie wasn't about a bad ass woman going to town, it was about a normal woman going to town. The power of two "mother" figures out to protect their "young". Classic play missed by the feminists, and douchebag men equally, because they are overtly looking at things completely wrong.
There are lots of other strong characters built around women, and it is sad to see them play second fiddle to Wolverine movies. Not that those were unwatchable, but Black Widow (Avengers) probably needs her own movie, where we can see her full skillset, not just her badass fighting techniques.
But we get Wonderwoman so .... there is that.
They said the same thing about GWB, it is what is in their playbook. Its all they know.
The fact that ONE MAN can join (Obama) or unjoin (Trump) a treaty should concern everyone. But hey, Fuck the Constitution requiring the Senate to approve treaties when we can hyperbole tyranny into acceptance!
I hate to break this to you, but humans are, for the lack of a better term, evolved into social constructs that are tribal in nature. It is built in.
Unless you don't believe in Evolution, there is no way to change millions of years of family unit pods.
We are equal. Born Equal in value as a human being. Not in Abilities, drive, skill, mental abilities. VALUE.
Technology helps smooth over the rough edges of abilities if made available to those with less ability, and more drive. A paraplegic can plow a field today, because of technology not available 130 years ago. His value as a human being remains unchanged.
But that isn't exactly how we view others. We don't value them as humans, but only as a complex calculation based on what they can do for society. We are trained that our value is based on how we contribute to society, when the reality is, we should be trained to see the innate value of each human by themselves.
This is how you produce true Liberty
The solution is to accumulate power at the highest levels, so that they can control the people's use of technology. Duh.
Kathy Griffin, is that you?
Comedy Gold right there, not the severed head, the hypocritical "apology" and all the people saying "I forgive her" who won't forgive anybody with an (R) after their name for anything.
practically everyone who spoke about election predictions from the DNC had Clinton winning the Electoral College easily.
It wasn't just the DNC, it was just about every poll out there. Trump didn't have a chance. There is a video montage of all the people saying "Trump will never be president". All of them MSM, and DC inbreds, not just the DNC and Hillary campaigns.
The stunned pundits from NBC to CNN and heck, even FOX was surprised. The data people everywhere failed. Except Trumps, who spent time and money on states he was pretty much "wasting" his time and effort on, states he won.
The vast majority of voters voted for Hillary. She won the popular vote.
But that isn't exactly how the Presidential Elections are counted, and Hillary didn't campaign except in states that she was winning, securing the ... popular vote. Trump dumped a ton of money, and spent time in rust belt talking their language, and Hillary was avoiding the public like the plague it was with her health issues.
In the end, a lot people felt less uncomfortable with Trump than with Clinton, especially in key states, and that led to the stunned media / DC complex on Election night. Watching Wolf Blitzer try and find "votes" on the big board for Hillary was comedic gold.
But yeah, it was the Russians hacking the elections and Trump Collusion and DNC data people and* ...
Notice, it was never Hillary being a terribly flawed candidate, caught cheating with the DNC, MSM against Bernie, and hiding out trying to coast in for the win.
Your best argument is the Android / iOS vs Microsoft Phone iterations during the last 10 years.
I know a guy, swore by Windows Phone, up and until the day that he couldn't get a replacement. He went with iPhone after that, and still complains. Won't use Android, for whatever reason.
My smart devices were, Palm III, Blackberry, Android. Back in the day of the Palm Pilot, I wished a phone had its capability for calendar / contacts / email ... I wish I could go back and invent the thing.
OnePlus 3T, 6GB Ram
CPU Qualcomm® Snapdragon 821 Quad Core, Kryo: 2x 2.35 GHz, 2x 1.6 GHz
GPU Adreno 530
RAM 6GB LPDDR4
Storage 64GB / 128GB UFS 2.0
Closing Apps is a thing of the past. Increases battery life by not having to power through memory swaps.
Came here to comment similarly. My Cell phone has more RAM.
Google, is actually on its second, and a third is in production. It bought Android and had a version in development before it did. They have another one in development now.
The "Cloud" is someone else's computer over there ---->
Paired Nicely with the article just below it. Excellent placement of plagiarized example articles.
A+
What the Arduino is gonna need is more Memory*
*Recent Experience in parsing a JSON into a stack of arrays in order to execute a simple loop to display on LED strands. While the Arduino could parse the JSON, and get it stacked into the arrays correctly, there was barely enough RAM to load the libraries needed to drive the LEDs. Eventually was able to get it to run, but gnarly ugly code.
JSON is not a new format, and the fact that it is for rejigging RSS feeds is proof that people don't understand how it is just another format.
Are you sure?
This is nothing more than the latest "Mac vs PC" or "Windows vs Linux" argument. JSON vs RSS