Or that the measurement is wrong, as it contradicts many previous measurement confirming the theory. Worth investigating, as there is -something- happening, but the measurement is as suspicious as the theory.
There are also plenty of lean and efficient vector/list/hashtable libraries in C. I hardly see the point of promoting the STL. Moreover, GCC probably already feature lists and stuffs, and has been for years. Therefore, I don't see exactly what is the point at saying that STL is more this and that, compared to what already works in GCC ?
The "test" linked in the article does not have privacy settings or agreement. The test is performed by a company whose business seems to be "commercial redirection services". Whatever that means I'll pass.
Slashdot Mirror
Or that the measurement is wrong, as it contradicts many previous measurement confirming the theory. Worth investigating, as there is -something- happening, but the measurement is as suspicious as the theory.
There are also plenty of lean and efficient vector/list/hashtable libraries in C. I hardly see the point of promoting the STL. Moreover, GCC probably already feature lists and stuffs, and has been for years. Therefore, I don't see exactly what is the point at saying that STL is more this and that, compared to what already works in GCC ?
The "test" linked in the article does not have privacy settings or agreement. The test is performed by a company whose business seems to be "commercial redirection services". Whatever that means I'll pass.