Slashdot Mirror


User: fatphil

fatphil's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,087
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,087

  1. Re:Reverse dates on Top Ten Persistent Design Flaws · · Score: 1

    """
    1/11/04
    Jan. 11, 2004

    The text matches the numbers.
    """

    Your argument becomes entirely null and void the second anyone says "my birth date is 1st November 1989". 1/11/1989. The text matches the numbers.

    You're assuming that noone uses a word order different from yours, which is as invalid an assumption as assuming that noone uses dd/mm/(yy)yy would be.

    FP.

  2. Re:Beware of Doublespeak (TM) on Australian Idol And ISP Censorship · · Score: 1

    It's not just the dictatorships.

    The Sicillian mafia was originally a community self-help organisation.
    What was to eventially become the IRA was also a community focused support group.

    Noble aims indeed. Or so it seemed at the time.

    FP.

  3. Re:What's the critical marketshare threshold... on Dutch Survey Shows IE Web Share Below 90% · · Score: 1

    "an instant 1d6 SAN loss"

    I know STR, INT, WIS, CON, DEX, CHR, but don't know SAN.

    An instant loss in sanitation?

    What, you shit you pants?

    FP.

  4. Re:Microsoft Development teams on Dutch Survey Shows IE Web Share Below 90% · · Score: 1

    There's a hypothetical simple solution - they should just find a BSD-licensed browser, and release their own version closed-source.

    FP.

  5. Re:From the article... on Linux Kernel to Fork? · · Score: 1

    I run small programs on small datasets. I don't even need the sum total of the HD space that I currently have. The concept of getting a bigger disk which will thereafter remain 90% empty is absurd. So I have no intention to "get with the times" just for the sake of it. I will accept donations of kit though, obviously. (nearly half of what I own is donated, I guess.)

    The systems that I have that actually have hard disks (5 out of 7 of the machines) are indeed small by today's standards, but large enough to get a simple workstation linux install up and running - ~4GB on average. The problem I had with the Gentoo install was that I had pre-partitioned the HD with the expectation of a typical /tmp requirement of only a few hundred megs (which has always worked fine for me in Debian). Alas it was waaaaaaay to small for Gentoo to bootstrap.

    In the future, I'll partition the next drive differently, so I can install with a 1G /tmp, and then switch its role with a different partition (/usr/local, say) when it's up and running.

    FP.

  6. Re:From the article... on Linux Kernel to Fork? · · Score: 1

    It seems like other systems are by default the equivalent of:

    USE="every goddam thing possible, yes with bells, and whistles, and a cherry on top if that's OK too"

    Which is scary really.

    I do look forward to giving gentoo a proper run, certainly.
    However, I'm an uptime queen (uptime should be more usefully measured in years rather than months), and I demand absolute reliability. I'm not 100% sure Gentoo offers the reliability I'm used to from Debian.

    FP.

  7. Re:The sky is falling! The sky is falling! on Security Flaws In Linux SMBFS · · Score: 1

    "You shouldn't have an internet server running SMB anyway"

    But note that it's SMBFS that's flawed, _not_ the smbd daemon itself.

    FP.

  8. Re:From the article... on Linux Kernel to Fork? · · Score: 1

    Not true. It could offer you versions of the package which do not have the dependency. I don't need anything to to with lpr as I have no printers, and no desire to even print to file, yet my package manager had decided that package Z needs a2ps which needs lpr. However, as some person somewhere once wanted to create such a dependency, the rest of the world, or those that run the usual distributions, is now saddled with it. I want the version that can't print, please.

    I believe that Gentoo offers such configurability, but have been put off installing Gentoo after a series of failures to install it on my small hard disks. (It wanted more than the size of the whole hard disk that previously contained 2 whole working modern OSes in order to install - and that's just plain crap behaviour.)

    So I don't believe the Gentoo idea is simply that of adding rice-alcohol to your fuel, I believe that it could, if only it would bloody install, offer superior dependency management through the ability to actually _manage_ dependencies, not simply _cope with_ dependencies.

    FP.

  9. Re:Why? on Is Firefox 1.0 Less Stable than Firefox PR1.0? · · Score: 1

    For the same reason as Firefox 1.0 now becoming available is newsworthy.

    i.e. barely at all. However, if it carries pro-FF raving, it should also carry anti-FF ranting.

    And by heck does /. carry pro-FF raving. Almost daily a few weeks back.

    FP.

  10. Re:Not really new on New Atomic Clock 1000 Times More Accurate · · Score: 1

    You seem to be forgetting the fact that all these standards are arbitrary, and could be changed at a committee's whim.

    It's happened before, and it will happen again.

    For example, thanks to committees pounds are metric units of mass. Yup - pounds are metric.

    FP.

  11. Bad reporting on New Atomic Clock 1000 Times More Accurate · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slashdot's error -
    It's not 1000 times more accurate, it's 3 times more accurate (than the NIST's mercury ion resonator). The figure of 1000 is what they think the technology in the future, but that's purely hypothetical.

    NPL's errors -
    Bombarding an ion with a blue laser in order to cool it is _in_no_way_ similar to firing a beam of light at a mirror-ball. Mirror balls do not get cooler when you fire beams of light at them. Explanations that use inappropriate analogies are as useful as wearing tie-died lab-coats in night-clubs.

    If "one part in 10^18" is "nearly a thousand times more accurate than the best clocks of today", then today's best clocks must be accurate to 1 part in 10^15. Therefore this new clock, being "three times more accurate than the Americans", "3.4 parts in 10^15", cannot be the be the best clock of today. Either that or someone in NPL can't do simple maths.

    FP.

  12. Re:Attention Slashbots on FCC Claims Regulatory Power Over Home Computers · · Score: 1

    But _terrorists_ could be using those PCs and modems.
    It's absolutely _vital_ that the FCC exercises its _legal mandate_ in order to control such _terroristic_ activity.
    I pray that Bush has the wisdom to back the FCC at every step.

    FP.

  13. Re:Excel is a real word too! on Excel Registered as Trademark, 19 Years Late · · Score: 1

    It's important to note that I was only partly right about the bit I was right about. The company was divided, and the trademarks were treated differently on either side of the pond. My comment only applied to the US side.

    Nice second link, thanks.
    FP.

  14. Re:Excel is a real word too! on Excel Registered as Trademark, 19 Years Late · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "X-windows" had not been around officially under that name at all. The "X Window System" had, of course. _Colloqially_ people have been calling it X-Windows, of course. I do, even though I know its trademarked name, which is clumsy.

    Aspirin was wrenched off Bayer as part of post-war reparations. Nothing to do with them not protecting it.

    FP.

  15. Re:complaints about IE ?? - was no WWW in 1991 !! on Novell vs. Microsoft, Again · · Score: 1

    However, the period in question is 1994-1996.

    FP.

  16. Re:The real reason it's not a threat on Microsoft Says Firefox Not a Threat to IE · · Score: 2, Funny

    TO keep the script simpler, it ran firefox no matter what you answered. "/Okay/ to FireFox" vs. "/No/, I'm not sure".

    FP.

  17. Re:Metric time - been done on Museum of the Future · · Score: 1

    Yup. I get the feeling that people haven't watched Fritz Lang's /Metropolis/ either.

  18. Re:It pertains to an ongoing terrorism investigati on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    However, they've already played the terrorism card.

    To late to put it back in their hand, everyone else has seen it.

    And now they should _justify_ it.

    FP.

  19. Re:OT: by and large on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    close - "on the whole"
    quite close - "in general"

    Such constructions are called idioms, they don't necessarily translate into foreign languages.

    FP.

  20. Re:The All-Purpose Excuse on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    I'm sure we'll all be able to trust
    Supreme Court Justice John Ashcroft
    to be honest and accurate.

    FP.

  21. Re:For Pete's sake. on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    """
    You think the government should have the right to seize property without due process, without judicial oversight, and without disclosing the nature of why they are seizing the property?
    """

    Yes. What was your address, again? Purely for statistics purposes, of course.

    FP. (do I need to add a /irony tag?)

  22. Re:That's always been the case on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    "There's also a problem when there's overly broad warrents"

    When Berlusconi ordered raids on Italian Communist Party headquarters back in 1994 almost _everything_ was siezed. Every computer, modem, telephone, fax. etc.

    And of course, no reason was given.

    And of course, none of it was returned.

    (And for the still-remaining naive US citizens out there, 'Communist' does not mean 'tool of the devil', they were and are a legitimate, fairly sensible socialist party.)

    FP.

  23. Re: Ah, terrorism on U.S. Goverment Responds to EFF's Indymedia Motion · · Score: 1

    We must start with The War On Pretzels.

    They have already nearly successfully struck, at the highest level, once -- we cannot let that happen again.

    FP.

  24. Re:Troll ?! on Beat Spam Using Hashcash · · Score: 1

    Exactly.
    Anyone who's seen these discussions before knows that the above list basically stitches up 95% of proposals instantly.
    The 5% that are still gasping for breath either fall to a few quick real live exchanges before croaking or the rare exception may make it as an explicit addition to that list.

    Nothing new here. Move along.

    FP.

  25. Re:Slashdot Spam Form Response on Beat Spam Using Hashcash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    """
    (*) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected

    One word, one hyphen: white-listing.
    """

    One word, one hyphen: header-forging

    """
    (*) Users of email will not put up with it

    Why? It's not costing them anything
    """

    It costs them CPU cycles.

    """
    (*) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes

    Need an order more worm riddled boxes, i.e. ONE ORDER LESS SPAM.
    """

    What language is that in?

    """
    (*) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical

    None have ever been tried.
    """

    If so, it's because none have been shown to be practical.

    FP.