I know it's been said there's no doubt that Assad is responsible for this. But is there actually any evidence of this? And if there is, why aren't we seeing that evidence plastered over the media?
1) the wi-fi balloon will provide more opportunity for Google.com to sell ads 2) the gates foundation is a philanthropic institution. google.org is a philanthropic institution.
actually, these bullshit laws are legal until the supreme court rules otherwise. however, since the these laws are secret, and the FISA court that deals with them is secret, and has already ruled that everything the NSA does is legal, it's going to be a warm day in hell before any objection ever reaches the supreme court.
huh? everything in that wikipedia (except the name 'developer studio' which was decided on for 4.0 by Julie Larson in a rather contentious meeting) was part of Visual C++ 2.0.
Slashdot Mirror
s/buckyballs/any product that could potentially cause harm to anyone/g
Say goodbye to commerce.
Call me skeptical, but...
I know it's been said there's no doubt that Assad is responsible for this. But is there actually any evidence of this? And if there is, why aren't we seeing that evidence plastered over the media?
They switched because your assumptions are wrong.
news flash: if you have a savings account then you have are invested in the same companies.
sounds like pascal's wager to me.
1) the wi-fi balloon will provide more opportunity for Google.com to sell ads
2) the gates foundation is a philanthropic institution. google.org is a philanthropic institution.
he's finding ways his philanthropy is better than what everyone else is doing
either that, or he's trying to find the best ways to help people...
the problem is that a statute is not unconstitutional until the supreme court says so.
actually, these bullshit laws are legal until the supreme court rules otherwise. however, since the these laws are secret, and the FISA court that deals with them is secret, and has already ruled that everything the NSA does is legal, it's going to be a warm day in hell before any objection ever reaches the supreme court.
yeah, let me know when you have that working... until then, i'm running sync...
it's not open-source, if you care about that, and it's still in beta (what isn't these days?), but it's free, secure and it works well.
huh? everything in that wikipedia (except the name 'developer studio' which was decided on for 4.0 by Julie Larson in a rather contentious meeting) was part of Visual C++ 2.0.
DLLs are entirely user-mode.
absolutely nothing to do with the kernel.
watch this
most of those skilled permanent residents came here first on H1B.
GOSUB yourself
Imagine you have a lot of music or movies and want to keep them in sync in multiple locations securely
isn't this exactly what BTsync does?
I use bittorrent's syncapp to sync my documents folder between my various machines. It's pretty-much the best thing ever.
Better yet, encrypt the cat pictures and give them suspicious sounding file names. Revel in joy when you hand over the keys to the judge...
Although there was no zombie apocalypse...
oh, phew. thanks for that.
same for all those silly files in /etc. bring on the registry!
are you saying that php, perl, ruby, java, etc... don't support sessions?
I'm talking about the real world here...
yeah, id' say any constitution that can be changed unilaterally is pretty flawed.
how about just a strong secular constitution backed by an independent judiciary?
hmm... July 4th might be a good day to declare you're going to do such a thing.
a constitution that can be changed by the president when he feels like it is not worth the paper used to wipe the asses of the people that wrote it.