This is another bogus slashdot article - Anyone examining the photos can clearly see the existance of Dozer contruction towers! Disproving the 3d printed construction of the car body... And the picture of the team clearly shows an individual (at the front) sitting cross legged on a Fraggle!
Have you ever watched a Dyslexic person using Word?
I have - I think they were using Dragon Dictate to write a document and have it read back to them.
It was a bit of a eye opener - hierarchical menus with words are not good for every one...
Ten percent of the population is dyslexic in some form, and how many more people are legally blind or partially sighted? Do they find the ribbon better?
cheers...
The Advertisements seems to claim compliance with 192 tests - Developed in conjunction with some working groups from the W3C....
This website contains several collections of new test pages that we developed in conjunction with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) working groups
Which working groups are they? Do they have street cred? and if the tests are found to be wanting - can any Open source fanboy join the working groups and improve the tests?
Because if the tests are open, fair and extensible... one cannot complain too loudly.
This is another bogus slashdot article - Anyone examining the photos can clearly see the existance of Dozer contruction towers! Disproving the 3d printed construction of the car body... And the picture of the team clearly shows an individual (at the front) sitting cross legged on a Fraggle!
Have you ever watched a Dyslexic person using Word? I have - I think they were using Dragon Dictate to write a document and have it read back to them. It was a bit of a eye opener - hierarchical menus with words are not good for every one... Ten percent of the population is dyslexic in some form, and how many more people are legally blind or partially sighted? Do they find the ribbon better? cheers...
This website contains several collections of new test pages that we developed in conjunction with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) working groups
Which working groups are they? Do they have street cred? and if the tests are found to be wanting - can any Open source fanboy join the working groups and improve the tests?
Because if the tests are open, fair and extensible... one cannot complain too loudly.