The only place where someone can bomb a University building, killing a postdoc getting ready to go on vacation with his wife and three children, and then come back to the city to open a popular deli in the heart of the city, blocks away from his murder, and be welcomed back with good reviews and a healthy patronage. The Radical Rye, as it was called, was displaced by the $200M Overture Center for the Arts, but he still has a juice cart called Loose Juice that you can patronize. A this 4-out-of-5 reviewer notes, even though he "bombed the Physics building called Sterling Hall, killing a young graduate student who was unfortunately doing research in the building" it's apparently okay because it was to "protest against military research done at the school". Oh, the postdoc wasn't involved with military research? "Oops!" Hey, this guy even had a beer with him! As this reviewer notes, "you should go by and have a smoothie at Carl's stand." One of the other bombers, still at large, was a writer for the campus paper.
Because people who commit a crime and serve their time should not be allowed to be successful after they have returned to society? They should not be allowed to operate as a normal human, and forced to live in slums and operate outside of normal society?
Karl served his time, and instead of becoming a hardened criminal, studied while in prison, and when released opened a series of successful businesses. He's a model of what people who make the worst mistakes in life should do -- he overcame the guilt of accidentally killing someone and the stigma of being incarcerated to become a productive, tax paying, business owner. (He was even in to day trading back in the late 90's and early 2000's, which I find funny for a former revolutionary...)
If your superiors either in the contract agency or the military agreed to let you use the GPL, without them understanding what that meant, chances are their permission is arguably invalid.
(Standard "I'm not a lawyer, but..")
If they didn't sign something, it may be invalid (but not necessarily, depending on how it was conducted.) BUT, not understanding a contract (license, whatever) does not release anyone from the bindings therein. (assuming that they have legally agreed it it.)
jon
Slashdot Mirror
Because people who commit a crime and serve their time should not be allowed to be successful after they have returned to society? They should not be allowed to operate as a normal human, and forced to live in slums and operate outside of normal society?
Karl served his time, and instead of becoming a hardened criminal, studied while in prison, and when released opened a series of successful businesses. He's a model of what people who make the worst mistakes in life should do -- he overcame the guilt of accidentally killing someone and the stigma of being incarcerated to become a productive, tax paying, business owner. (He was even in to day trading back in the late 90's and early 2000's, which I find funny for a former revolutionary...)
He does have the best smoothie stand around.
jon (Who's had quite a few beers with Karl.)
An excellent book on the topic:
Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity
by Siva Vaidhyanathan
ISBN 0814788068
If your superiors either in the contract agency or the military agreed to let you use the GPL, without them understanding what that meant, chances are their permission is arguably invalid.
(Standard "I'm not a lawyer, but..")
If they didn't sign something, it may be invalid (but not necessarily, depending on how it was conducted.) BUT, not understanding a contract (license, whatever) does not release anyone from the bindings therein. (assuming that they have legally agreed it it.) jon