Screw the parent. What does it matter if he's wrong or right? Do you really need some guy's word to prove or disprove the obvious harm to the environment and human health that industrial agriculture produces? The evidence is, literally, all around you!
The danger from the DPRK is the massive amounts of conventional artillery and battlefield rockets they have, not nukes. FROGs and SCUDs can be shot down by Patriots, the US and RoK will hammer them with long range PGMs like MRLS and with airpower.
Seoul would have to be at least nuked before the US would deploy nuclear weapons that close to Russia and China.
... to South Korea.
To South Korea, the threat of a nuclear armed DPRK is kind of redundant when the North can inflict such awesome amounts of damage conventionally. This has frustrated other nations like Japan, who are much more afraid of a nuclear North, and also far more likely targets of a nuclear attack.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously?
Screw the parent. What does it matter if he's wrong or right? Do you really need some guy's word to prove or disprove the obvious harm to the environment and human health that industrial agriculture produces? The evidence is, literally, all around you!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_cotton
http://www.ota.com/organic/environment/cotton_environment.html
Do your own fucking googling next time and save your smart ass quips.
The danger from the DPRK is the massive amounts of conventional artillery and battlefield rockets they have, not nukes. FROGs and SCUDs can be shot down by Patriots, the US and RoK will hammer them with long range PGMs like MRLS and with airpower.
Seoul would have to be at least nuked before the US would deploy nuclear weapons that close to Russia and China.