Does anyone know if the RIAA has attempted to file a suit against companies that run MP3 sites that are not located in the U.S.? I run AudioPhilez (www.audiophilez.com) which is located on a U.S. server but I am physically located in Australia and am the sole owner of the site. On another note, this is obviously more of the scare tactics the RIAA is famous for. "Make an example of the big MP3 sites, and watch the smaller ones cower in submission". I personally don't believe AudioPhilez appears blatantly about copyright infringement and I've posted a copyright policy and warnings on the site. There are a huge number of MP3's from unsigned bands in the index, and they *are* downloaded often.
Slashdot Mirror
Does anyone know if the RIAA has attempted to file a suit against companies that run MP3 sites that are not located in the U.S.? I run AudioPhilez (www.audiophilez.com) which is located on a U.S. server but I am physically located in Australia and am the sole owner of the site. On another note, this is obviously more of the scare tactics the RIAA is famous for. "Make an example of the big MP3 sites, and watch the smaller ones cower in submission". I personally don't believe AudioPhilez appears blatantly about copyright infringement and I've posted a copyright policy and warnings on the site. There are a huge number of MP3's from unsigned bands in the index, and they *are* downloaded often.