The fact that he somehow got a gun, got it into a supposedly secure area and shot people without his parents knowing he was disturbed is irrelevent as always.
No Payoffs, you watch for years for something 'monumental' to happen but it get fuzzed each time. They keep you hanging on and hoping. Which is fine for a year or two but after that there is only 'so' many times you can hack ANOTHER conspiracy/coverup/lookingthewrongway until it becomes pretty boring. It's almost like the writers are afraid to make any bold statements or actually GO anywhere with it.
Heh, Porn is worse than 5 or 6 popups.
Foxsports, 1wrestling, espn have all had at one stage or another have had multiple popups.
I don't surf for porn anymore, did that in the early 90's,:=)
Those of you around in those days will smile with the recollection on the net then.
I have no problems with just a single add or popup
when visiting a site.
However the sites with 3,4 or more popups every single damn page are the ones that I don't visit again.
I mean you can't even SEE the site with freaking
4 or 5 adds, +the ones with no browser windows.
Why would you do it?
Is the question here whether pop-ups are bad full stop or should be limited?
Oh yah, another humanoid alien race
on
Voyager Eulogy
·
· Score: 1
I stopped becoming a fan of ST when EVERY single freaking 'Alien' they came across was bipedal and
humanoid. I mean ffs, Bear says only 10% of universal life is probably bipedal, let alone carbon and water based.
Severely stunted imaginations is what killed this show.
Re:How about JonKatz opinion?
on
Online Journals
·
· Score: 1
God Bless Owen's soul.
And then roast all these hypocritical Jim Rome wannab'es...
C'mon now ppl, how many times have you heard this kind of thing before..?? Some guy just made a killing on Wall Street because of this CNBC article and now he is laughing his ass off probably on the way to the Maldives..:)
After the problems TimeWarner/AOL have had with the internation component of their merger and the Bush Govt. undecided on DOJ/MS case and their own policies do you REALLY think Transmeta or AMD would do this now??
I've got to chuckle a little about this, The idea of taking a server/ISP/connections overseas or onto/within a wholly owned domain (physical or net) subject to censorship by yourself only was an idea I thought Microsoft were going to do. Screw the DOJ, buy a nice little South Pacific island, spend a few billion laying either undersea cabling or launch a few sats, call it Microland or GateWorld if you insist. Browbeat/Bribe a poor Asian or African nation with good USA ties into accepting your 'ownership' of its telecommunication or net infrastructure.It wouldn't be hard as most poor nations would jump at the chance to court a large international company into their borders and if it's in a region,lets say Taiwan, where US interest's are considered 'sensitive' would they be willing to try to strongarm a country into rejecting/refusing or even severing a company like Microsoft's access to the rest of the world/web if based from there or nearby? I suggest that if you could play the interests of the countries against the income/oppurtunities such a site/domain would create you could possibly succeed. But the resources and clout you would need to have as 'bargaining' chips would have to be vast. Maybe the fellow building the online free university has had to deal with some of these problems? Or perhaps these are issues he will run into. "The best buckets a SCREAMING one" in lieu of no.sig
Slashdot Mirror
Of course it was the game!!
The fact that he somehow got a gun, got it into a supposedly secure area and shot people without his parents knowing he was disturbed is irrelevent as always.
Bah!!
I suppose we are lucky he wasn't using OGC 8.2..
Was he bunny hopping??:)
Join the club guys and gals.
You are about to go through what we here in Australia have been going through since day one.
One company ownz it all and the rest pay through the nose.
No Payoffs, you watch for years for something 'monumental' to happen but it get fuzzed each time. They keep you hanging on and hoping. Which is fine for a year or two but after that there is only 'so' many times you can hack ANOTHER conspiracy/coverup/lookingthewrongway until it becomes pretty boring.
It's almost like the writers are afraid to make any bold statements or actually GO anywhere with it.
I think a reviewer just got an electron slap..:)
Heh, Porn is worse than 5 or 6 popups. Foxsports, 1wrestling, espn have all had at one stage or another have had multiple popups. I don't surf for porn anymore, did that in the early 90's, :=)
Those of you around in those days will smile with the recollection on the net then.
I have no problems with just a single add or popup when visiting a site. However the sites with 3,4 or more popups every single damn page are the ones that I don't visit again. I mean you can't even SEE the site with freaking 4 or 5 adds, +the ones with no browser windows. Why would you do it? Is the question here whether pop-ups are bad full stop or should be limited?
I stopped becoming a fan of ST when EVERY single freaking 'Alien' they came across was bipedal and humanoid. I mean ffs, Bear says only 10% of universal life is probably bipedal, let alone carbon and water based. Severely stunted imaginations is what killed this show.
God Bless Owen's soul. And then roast all these hypocritical Jim Rome wannab'es...
C'mon now ppl, how many times have you heard this kind of thing before..?? Some guy just made a killing on Wall Street because of this CNBC article and now he is laughing his ass off probably on the way to the Maldives..:) After the problems TimeWarner/AOL have had with the internation component of their merger and the Bush Govt. undecided on DOJ/MS case and their own policies do you REALLY think Transmeta or AMD would do this now??
I've got to chuckle a little about this, The idea of taking a server/ISP/connections overseas or onto/within a wholly owned domain (physical or net) subject to censorship by yourself only was an idea I thought Microsoft were going to do. Screw the DOJ, buy a nice little South Pacific island, spend a few billion laying either undersea cabling or launch a few sats, call it Microland or GateWorld if you insist. Browbeat/Bribe a poor Asian or African nation with good USA ties into accepting your 'ownership' of its telecommunication or net infrastructure.It wouldn't be hard as most poor nations would jump at the chance to court a large international company into their borders and if it's in a region ,lets say Taiwan, where US interest's are considered 'sensitive' would they be willing to try to strongarm a country into rejecting/refusing or even severing a company like Microsoft's access to the rest of the world/web if based from there or nearby? I suggest that if you could play the interests of the countries against the income/oppurtunities such a site/domain would create you could possibly succeed. But the resources and clout you would need to have as 'bargaining' chips would have to be vast. Maybe the fellow building the online free university has had to deal with some of these problems? Or perhaps these are issues he will run into. "The best buckets a SCREAMING one" in lieu of no .sig