As far as I'm aware, recent browsers don't permit sites to access the history. I know of the history.previous / history.next, but these are only permissible when using local content such as plugins, or local webapps. But now that I think of it, couldn't a website load a bunch of web URLs in a hidden frame, and then analyze said URLs's CSS properties to see if they have been visited before? If that's possible, that would be a semi-transparent way to observe where the user hangs out on the internet, I suppose.
But the state sees nothing of this money, and they don't like that!
Re:And it's still not as good as Ubuntu or Debian.
on
Fedora 19 Released
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Thank you for your very lengthy and detailed comparison of Ubuntu and Debian VS Fedora, it has enlightened us in countless ways! I think we can hereby declare Ubuntu and Debian as superior to Fedora, at once. Case closed!
I would have expected the feasibility of maintenance and support to be an important factor when adopting new software... I hardly see how this can be overlooked!
Whoa! A whole 17 days have gone by and they still haven't release a worldwide patch?! Give them some time, you make it sound like it has been in the wild for months.
Slashdot Mirror
Did someone force you to read this? If not, what are you complaining about?
It seems to be fixed in most major browers, and I can't reproduce it locally on the lastest Firefox. This blog post talks about it a bit more.
As far as I'm aware, recent browsers don't permit sites to access the history. I know of the history.previous / history.next, but these are only permissible when using local content such as plugins, or local webapps. But now that I think of it, couldn't a website load a bunch of web URLs in a hidden frame, and then analyze said URLs's CSS properties to see if they have been visited before? If that's possible, that would be a semi-transparent way to observe where the user hangs out on the internet, I suppose.
But the state sees nothing of this money, and they don't like that!
Thank you for your very lengthy and detailed comparison of Ubuntu and Debian VS Fedora, it has enlightened us in countless ways! I think we can hereby declare Ubuntu and Debian as superior to Fedora, at once. Case closed!
I would have expected the feasibility of maintenance and support to be an important factor when adopting new software... I hardly see how this can be overlooked!
>> He reported the bug back in May.
Whoa! A whole 17 days have gone by and they still haven't release a worldwide patch?! Give them some time, you make it sound like it has been in the wild for months.