One last thingy that I noticed. There is no digital signature appended to the message, not any other way to identify the writer of this e-mail. Ofcourse you could make a phonecall. But coming from MS one would expect better use of Outlook (Or not):-) Lack of traceability brings up an interesting issue. Not that I'm into conspiracy theories, but what if an agent of the plaintif (e.g. $MS) sent the material in question, just to cause the other party trouble? Apparently the copyrighted material in question is already available through other means.
Slashdot Mirror
One last thingy that I noticed. There is no digital signature appended to the message, not any other way to identify the writer of this e-mail. Ofcourse you could make a phonecall. But coming from MS one would expect better use of Outlook (Or not) :-) Lack of traceability brings up an interesting issue. Not that I'm into conspiracy theories, but what if an agent of the plaintif (e.g. $MS) sent the material in question, just to cause the other party trouble? Apparently the copyrighted material in question is already available through other means.