delaying a packet in a queue is not blocking the packet... so the law is pointless. deciding now much delay is effectively a block would itself be arbitrary. packet prioritization with some level of latency is still inevitable.
stop using the phrase "network neutrality"... it no longer means anything.
yes, the age requirements on political decision making positions, such as the ones described in the story, were put there by individuals who just don't understand how things SHOULD work.
so you believe i've already achieved everything you find is necessary for those you speak for, while you remain unable to provide it to them.
you've admittedly failed. smile all you want, it won't change anything. you'll never change anything. you just want to convince people of ANYTHING, while you remain NOTHING.
so when i say it's best to stay on earth, and point out the obvious truth that the only reason to leave is total destruction or the belief of it's inevitability, that comment gets moderated down, but when you say the same thing as a response to a response to my comment, then it's "Interesting".
science isn't about working towards a goal... that is research and development. the types of pure sciences required to make moving to a new planet work will not be realized under the motivation of inevitable destruction.
another person choosing the "convince people the destruction is inevitable" angle...
you can't prove to me that humanity hasn't simply chosen not to tell you where and how it exists elsewhere, because there is no reason for you to know, and many psychological reasons for you not to know.
I just don't think exploring other star systems has captured our collective attention the way landing on the moon did.
landing on the moon doesn't capture the collective attention the way landing on the moon did. what's wrong with earth? why the need to leave? lots of open space left if you don't like your neighbors. the motivation you're looking for can only be obtained by first destroying the earth's ecosystem, or convincing others the destruction is inevitable.
claiming that adding "on the internet" or "in a web browser" is not innovation does not make it law.
without arbitrary or discriminatory blocking.
delaying a packet in a queue is not blocking the packet... so the law is pointless. deciding now much delay is effectively a block would itself be arbitrary. packet prioritization with some level of latency is still inevitable.
stop using the phrase "network neutrality"... it no longer means anything.
you are NOTHING.
you and your children are idiots.
you've admittedly failed. smile all you want, it won't change anything. you'll never change anything. you just want to convince people of ANYTHING, while you remain NOTHING.
you don't speak for me.
you are NOTHING.
who are you trying to convince, and why?
controlling a robot SWARM is much much much more complicated. bandwidth / interference / latency become near instant insurmountable problems.
science isn't about working towards a goal... that is research and development. the types of pure sciences required to make moving to a new planet work will not be realized under the motivation of inevitable destruction.
an extinction level event (ELE) WILL happen.
another person choosing the "convince people the destruction is inevitable" angle...
you can't prove to me that humanity hasn't simply chosen not to tell you where and how it exists elsewhere, because there is no reason for you to know, and many psychological reasons for you not to know.
We need to have a plan B
i don't need a plan B. stop trying to preach.
so you are going with the "convince people the destruction is inevitable" angle.... much easier than actually destroying the earth's ecosystem....
I just don't think exploring other star systems has captured our collective attention the way landing on the moon did.
landing on the moon doesn't capture the collective attention the way landing on the moon did. what's wrong with earth? why the need to leave? lots of open space left if you don't like your neighbors. the motivation you're looking for can only be obtained by first destroying the earth's ecosystem, or convincing others the destruction is inevitable.
NOTICE: no robots swarms were actually controlled in the making of this story