in that case your bank is charging you to use your debit card, and then refunding you those fees in separate transactions. perhaps they write of the refunds while never paying income tax on the money they claim they took from you before they refunded it.
i have banked with every national chain and almost every internet bank and i've never seen a "debit charge rebate" but it's very suspicious to me. i've also built countless P.O.S. payment service applications and i've never seen this.
so if you buy something with your debit card, does it show for more than the purchase price on your statement?
my terms are simple...present yourself to me, admit what you've done, ONLY THEN will i kill you.
if you aren't willing to fill these terms, and wish to continue to act in only a cowardly fashion, then you're a meaningless coward. your life has no meaning or purpose... there is nothing to remove.
if you think charges against me are in order, then your continued response is not in your best interest, coward.
i assure you no attempt on your life would be unsuccessful.
WHO SAYS where capital letters go? it seems I SAY, as I HAVE DEMONSTRATED MY ABILITY TO DO SO.
i am not using 'communist' to mean 'stuff i think is a bad idea' (although it's telling that you might think i was)... i'm pointing out that 'allowing a service provider to impose themselves on lands owned and controlled by people who do not want such imposition, and the imposition is brought under the pretense that THE SERVICE IS GUARANTEED TO THE PEOPLE, AND THAT SERVICE ITSELF HAS THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE' is """COMMUNIST""". i'm saying that, BECAUSE IT IS.
i don't think you know what ironic means... did you mean iconic?
i have turn tables set up in my studio... technics 1200s with a bunch of different needles... i appreciate pushing the envelopes of analog mediums. every play is unique and the product of an observable physical action.
and the police reported the case to prosecuting attorneys who presented the case to a judge who exonerated the accused and dismissed the charges and ultimately convicted someone else of the crime.
no harm would have come to the victim if the media was not utilized to push the attackers agenda prematurely... and now after the justice system has done its job and the score has been settled, the victim chooses to hypocritically utilize the same media to continue to portray the attacker in a negative light using ignorant hypotheticals that are little more than obvious lies. i believe he has had worse nightmares. i believes he understands why he had a password. i believe he understands why he was an idiot for not protecting it AS HE HAS STATED AS SUCH.
being accused of coming into possession of indecent images of children is not harmful to a reputation unless those charges are broadcast before acquittal.
he MOST CERTAINLY AND KNOWINGLY LIED through an exaggerated hypothetical designed to suggest the convicted man was subhuman. the man was sentenced. justice was served.
what did he do to this man to provoke such an unimaginable response? what "good" can come from continued provocation?
Slashdot Mirror
you are NOTHING.
i have banked with every national chain and almost every internet bank and i've never seen a "debit charge rebate" but it's very suspicious to me. i've also built countless P.O.S. payment service applications and i've never seen this.
so if you buy something with your debit card, does it show for more than the purchase price on your statement?
if you aren't willing to fill these terms, and wish to continue to act in only a cowardly fashion, then you're a meaningless coward. your life has no meaning or purpose... there is nothing to remove.
if you think charges against me are in order, then your continued response is not in your best interest, coward.
i assure you no attempt on your life would be unsuccessful.
you are NOTHING
everything i said is completely true. perhaps you couldn't find supporting evidence to support your lies... or perhaps you're just a liar.
you are NOTHING
you are NOTHING
i am not using 'communist' to mean 'stuff i think is a bad idea' (although it's telling that you might think i was)... i'm pointing out that 'allowing a service provider to impose themselves on lands owned and controlled by people who do not want such imposition, and the imposition is brought under the pretense that THE SERVICE IS GUARANTEED TO THE PEOPLE, AND THAT SERVICE ITSELF HAS THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE' is """COMMUNIST""". i'm saying that, BECAUSE IT IS.
you're an idiot.
so confident in your argument that you are unwilling to take credit for it?
you are NOTHING
you are NOTHING
i have turn tables set up in my studio... technics 1200s with a bunch of different needles... i appreciate pushing the envelopes of analog mediums. every play is unique and the product of an observable physical action.
no harm would have come to the victim if the media was not utilized to push the attackers agenda prematurely... and now after the justice system has done its job and the score has been settled, the victim chooses to hypocritically utilize the same media to continue to portray the attacker in a negative light using ignorant hypotheticals that are little more than obvious lies. i believe he has had worse nightmares. i believes he understands why he had a password. i believe he understands why he was an idiot for not protecting it AS HE HAS STATED AS SUCH.
you're an idiot.
you're an idiot.
the IMPLICIT HYPOCRISY OF THE ACT is what's salient. i know, because I AM THE ONE THAT BROUGHT IT UP.
you're an idiot.
slashdot = stagnated with vengeance.
what did he do to this man to provoke such an unimaginable response? what "good" can come from continued provocation?
you are NOTHING