It seems simple: perhaps the ruling could outlaw direct linking of illegal sites, but not indirect linking. And as for outdated links (e.g. the HALO.org example), if such a thing were found, there could simply be a demand for the site to change or remove the link. Solved. Thanks.
I didn't need to read this entire article through to further my rather firm notion that she's a complete hypocrite (and a horrible "artist"). She rants and raves for paragraphs about evil the recording industry is, and how her "art" and other "art" of pop mainstream crap shouldn't treated as products, and so on and so forth. What is she thinking? She signed the contract, she signed to the label, she agreed to the videos, she did this thing and that thing that _made_ her the total product she is today. She's not an "aritst." She puts out a product like Proctor and Gamble put out products, only the latter's is a little easier to take. She signed up day #1 to be DGC's (or whatever label she is on now) whore, and now she still wants to play the aritst card. No thanks, Courtney. Secondly, she details corporate culture for two pages and then asserts that "We don't understand or want to understand corporate culture." God. She needs to get over herself and go ahead and fade away. The MP3 saga does not her undying and unholy hypocricy. Or photos of her nasty likeness, for that matter. And Courtney, 192k MP3s sound fine. And I haven't heard a pleasant guitar tone in any of your "art" yet. Perhaps you ought to stick to killing off your husbands; you seem pretty talented at that.
Slashdot Mirror
i heard that if you put a piece of bologna over your cell phone, you'll be fine. slap a little dijon on it, and it just protects you that much more.
Ba ha.. why/when did Wired fire hm?
It seems simple: perhaps the ruling could outlaw direct linking of illegal sites, but not indirect linking. And as for outdated links (e.g. the HALO.org example), if such a thing were found, there could simply be a demand for the site to change or remove the link. Solved. Thanks.
I didn't need to read this entire article through to further my rather firm notion that she's a complete hypocrite (and a horrible "artist"). She rants and raves for paragraphs about evil the recording industry is, and how her "art" and other "art" of pop mainstream crap shouldn't treated as products, and so on and so forth. What is she thinking? She signed the contract, she signed to the label, she agreed to the videos, she did this thing and that thing that _made_ her the total product she is today. She's not an "aritst." She puts out a product like Proctor and Gamble put out products, only the latter's is a little easier to take. She signed up day #1 to be DGC's (or whatever label she is on now) whore, and now she still wants to play the aritst card. No thanks, Courtney. Secondly, she details corporate culture for two pages and then asserts that "We don't understand or want to understand corporate culture." God. She needs to get over herself and go ahead and fade away. The MP3 saga does not her undying and unholy hypocricy. Or photos of her nasty likeness, for that matter. And Courtney, 192k MP3s sound fine. And I haven't heard a pleasant guitar tone in any of your "art" yet. Perhaps you ought to stick to killing off your husbands; you seem pretty talented at that.
Didn't that up-up-etc code pretty much work for 95% of the Konami NES games? Karnov, etc...