Either or both, but almost certainly one or the other. I would, however, put my money on the US. Read this story http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/the-point-of-no-return/8186 in The Atlantic for a discussion of some of the issues. The risk of a cyber attack are minimal vs. sending in the Israeli air force. Make no mistake- as they did in Iraq, Israel would not allow this facility to come online. I am certain the US is involved, with the help of one or several US computer security firms and maybe Microsoft itself, as well as Siemans. Notice that it was a Belarus computer security firm that found the worm- not a British, American or German one. (Or Japanese for that matter)
Slashdot Mirror
Either or both, but almost certainly one or the other. I would, however, put my money on the US. Read this story http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/the-point-of-no-return/8186 in The Atlantic for a discussion of some of the issues. The risk of a cyber attack are minimal vs. sending in the Israeli air force. Make no mistake- as they did in Iraq, Israel would not allow this facility to come online. I am certain the US is involved, with the help of one or several US computer security firms and maybe Microsoft itself, as well as Siemans. Notice that it was a Belarus computer security firm that found the worm- not a British, American or German one. (Or Japanese for that matter)