Does the ACLU consider that spammers deny their victims their freedoms: (1) Email forgeries - Sending their spam with their victims' email addresses forged. (2) Denial of Service Attacks on their victims (3) Ruin victim's reputations (4) Physical assault (5) Deny/occupy/displace victims' time and bandwith. All of the above, and more, has been well documented over time; Consolidated, organized efforts of the spam industry did items 1,2, & 3 to me 3 years ago and I'm still enduring the aftermath. Don't think for one minute that the spam industry is not well-organized until you see what they can collectively do to a victim they single out to make an example out of. I am still paying the price for disagreeing with one of them, and they are graciously allowing me to remain alive.
Slashdot Mirror
Does the ACLU consider that spammers deny their victims their freedoms:
(1) Email forgeries - Sending their spam with their victims' email addresses forged.
(2) Denial of Service Attacks on their victims
(3) Ruin victim's reputations
(4) Physical assault
(5) Deny/occupy/displace victims' time and bandwith.
All of the above, and more, has been well documented over time; Consolidated, organized efforts of the spam industry did items 1,2, & 3 to me 3 years ago and I'm still enduring the aftermath. Don't think for one minute that the spam industry is not well-organized until you see what they can collectively do to a victim they single out to make an example out of. I am still paying the price for disagreeing with one of them, and they are graciously allowing me to remain alive.