I can speak about this since I am a biologist familiar with this research, I suspect like a scientist Dawkens will demonstrate that when his viewpoints are challenged by new evidence, he must adopt new ways of viewing the world that are consistent with the available evidence. A lesson theists would do well learning.
In other news, I am not familiar with this research, nor a biologist, I just made a false appeal to authority because it made my statements sound more insightful. (A lesson I have learned studying theists.)
How will lawyers use it?
What a convincing argument without a single counter-example.
Kickstarter?
I can speak about this since I am a biologist familiar with this research, I suspect like a scientist Dawkens will demonstrate that when his viewpoints are challenged by new evidence, he must adopt new ways of viewing the world that are consistent with the available evidence. A lesson theists would do well learning. In other news, I am not familiar with this research, nor a biologist, I just made a false appeal to authority because it made my statements sound more insightful. (A lesson I have learned studying theists.)
Why do you post as an anon coward ? Are you really _that_ ashamed of being a religious freak ? Then grow up, nobody will make fun of you.
bad advice, fun will be made.