I guess you missed the part where Bush said he was for doing something about "global warming". He killed Kyoto because that treaty sucked. It was not global. It didn't include the future powers like China and India. It was a bad treaty.
No at the END of the movie
on
Review: A.I.
·
· Score: 1
At the end robot boy is in ice that covers NYC. What's being said above is that if a ice age came on the polar caps would grow again and thus NYC would go back to being dry like it is now.
No I got it. It still sucked.
on
Review: A.I.
·
· Score: 1
Yea I got that and much more.
The problem is that the director didn't seem to get it.
If the robots in the end think we are the creators does that mean we are gods? Oooooo....
Yawn
Maybe "trash" is too harsh for my taste.
But is was struck when at the end of the movie I cared more about the Teddy than David. Teddy seemed more human and able to love than David. Why is that?
You're 100% correct 118 is way too small to draw this type of conclusion. Having actually sat in meeting with actual top cancer researchers where they poo poo cancer studies with 1000s of patients I can tell you for a fact that 118 is way way too small for this type of study.
Yes, It seems that prior art is the only way to prove that something is not trivial. The argument is: If it were trivial then someone would have invented it before. That combined with the lazy search for prior art seems to be the loop hole needed to patent any old idea. They need to consult experts! -Crock
Slashdot Mirror
I guess you missed the part where Bush said he was for doing something about "global warming". He killed Kyoto because that treaty sucked. It was not global. It didn't include the future powers like China and India. It was a bad treaty.
At the end robot boy is in ice that covers NYC. What's being said above is that if a ice age came on the polar caps would grow again and thus NYC would go back to being dry like it is now.
Yea I got that and much more. The problem is that the director didn't seem to get it. If the robots in the end think we are the creators does that mean we are gods? Oooooo.... Yawn
Maybe "trash" is too harsh for my taste. But is was struck when at the end of the movie I cared more about the Teddy than David. Teddy seemed more human and able to love than David. Why is that?
You're 100% correct 118 is way too small to draw this type of conclusion. Having actually sat in meeting with actual top cancer researchers where they poo poo cancer studies with 1000s of patients I can tell you for a fact that 118 is way way too small for this type of study.
You mean small shuck of Apple. I was/is less than 1% for total shares. Just some money to let people know that M$ wouldn't drop Office for the Mac.
No they weren't. In fact Sony had to drop the case and refile do to some errors in the case. I don't think it's come up again and Connectix is going full ahead.
http://www.connectix.com/ company/press_cvgs_jun2900.html
Yes, It seems that prior art is the only way to prove that something is not trivial. The argument is: If it were trivial then someone would have invented it before. That combined with the lazy search for prior art seems to be the loop hole needed to patent any old idea. They need to consult experts! -Crock