Well if you have problems with that then where is the outrage for ALL prisoners in the US? I've been in maximum security before and I never had any defense fund or anyone crying over it. Ever been in a 23 hour lock down situation for months? I have and although I do understand the conditions aren't great, they serve their purpose. They need to isolate him from others and make sure he doesn't get hurt by others or hurt himself. This is not unusual in anyway and the fact that people think it is shows how little everyone knows about the conditions in almost any US prison.
Don't do the crime if you can't handle the time. Seriously. Who commits a crime and then cries because the conditions aren't ideal? It's a joke.
Fair enough. I kind of thought OJ was guilty before he got tried myself. But I wasn't in charge of his trial so nothing bad came of my rush to judgement. We make decisions based on information we have, but we can amend those later if we need to right? Is anyone really harmed when some idiot like myself rushes to judgement?
Amen. How many people thought OJ was guilty before his trial? I know I did. Hell I still think he did it. We make judgements based on information we have, but we're not deciding his fate so who cares?
He gets his pre-trial evaluation this month and should see justice relatively soon. Is it a travesty of justice to allow the government to make their case, finish their investigation, and ensure that Manning is fit to be tried?
Thank God for modern media and the US intelligence agencies fostering their bogeyman images. Otherwise we might think things that happen are caused by coincidence or are real. No no, it's all a facade by the globalist cabal. Project blue beam is sending down holographic images of Assange raping women and the CIA can project this into your brain using nanites sprayed from UFO chemtrails and turned into pixie dust by HAARP.
Is this really the most likely scenario? Or is the most likely scenario the fact that this might be real and he might actually have committed these crimes? Is wikileaks discredited? No. Will they continue spreading info? Yes. If there's a conspiracy it's being carried out by fools that can't do their job.
The US loves this type of thing. They get to basically do nothing and the whole world thinks they're all reaching.
Some mentioned taxes but another reason is for social security pay outs. My father died when I was young and I was sent money from his social security (on behalf of my parents of course). So one reason is to ID beneficiaries.
I meant it, wasn't trying to troll if it came off that way. I like to joke a lot on here but I do commend them for giving us this site for so long. Where else can I cause so much trouble:D
Yes but I doubt RMS would have a problem with Ubuntu making a profit or focusing on it's customers as long as one can get access to the source without restriction and they give their work back to the community through said source code.
In fairness to them it's really just a commentary and discussion site. Yes they're biased. But aren't we all? They post that way because It sparks conversation, which is the draw here. I like the threaded format and you can really find some "gold nuggets" of knowledge here. There are some very sharp guys that linger and post. Not as many as there used to be AFAIK but you still see a great rotation of good commentary.
And as long as the source code is provided how can people really object to their focus on things that make a profit? They need to survive and that means making money.
The article claims the company is unprofitable but how would anyone outside know if Canonical is profitable? Isn't it privately held? I've never heard of a private company publishing their numbers. I couldn't find any data to back up either side outside of rumor or hearsay. Does anyone have any info regarding this?
As long as this time around I can be the one to cash out I'm fine with it. I saw many millionaire developers driving Ferraris and when my time came it went to the birds. Such is life but a new bubble would be sweet for a lot of us. Is anyone really harmed when a fool parts with his money?
You just highlighted the real issue. "Smart" people thinking they know what's best for everyone else. In America or is Vietnam it's all the same. Fucking nannies all around. Let me live my life.
Slashdot Mirror
Well if you have problems with that then where is the outrage for ALL prisoners in the US? I've been in maximum security before and I never had any defense fund or anyone crying over it. Ever been in a 23 hour lock down situation for months? I have and although I do understand the conditions aren't great, they serve their purpose. They need to isolate him from others and make sure he doesn't get hurt by others or hurt himself. This is not unusual in anyway and the fact that people think it is shows how little everyone knows about the conditions in almost any US prison.
Don't do the crime if you can't handle the time. Seriously. Who commits a crime and then cries because the conditions aren't ideal? It's a joke.
Looking for someone that can:
1. Hold their hand like they're pulling a carrot from the ground.
2. Not ask questions.
Fair enough. I kind of thought OJ was guilty before he got tried myself. But I wasn't in charge of his trial so nothing bad came of my rush to judgement. We make decisions based on information we have, but we can amend those later if we need to right? Is anyone really harmed when some idiot like myself rushes to judgement?
Amen. How many people thought OJ was guilty before his trial? I know I did. Hell I still think he did it. We make judgements based on information we have, but we're not deciding his fate so who cares?
He gets his pre-trial evaluation this month and should see justice relatively soon. Is it a travesty of justice to allow the government to make their case, finish their investigation, and ensure that Manning is fit to be tried?
So do you think OJ was guilty?
So basically marketing attacks me every single day? Time for some drop kick sandwiches.
Capitalization. I need help with it.
Well now that you put it that way, uhm, which way to your recruitment center?
Thank God for modern media and the US intelligence agencies fostering their bogeyman images. Otherwise we might think things that happen are caused by coincidence or are real. No no, it's all a facade by the globalist cabal. Project blue beam is sending down holographic images of Assange raping women and the CIA can project this into your brain using nanites sprayed from UFO chemtrails and turned into pixie dust by HAARP.
Is this really the most likely scenario? Or is the most likely scenario the fact that this might be real and he might actually have committed these crimes? Is wikileaks discredited? No. Will they continue spreading info? Yes. If there's a conspiracy it's being carried out by fools that can't do their job.
The US loves this type of thing. They get to basically do nothing and the whole world thinks they're all reaching.
That would all make sense if he was actually discredited. I don't see anyone ignoring his message.
They may be trying to bring back dumb terminals? It's the future of computing I guess.
Welcome to AyatollahNet, please login using your citizen #.
Man I tried to rational but I ended up divided.
If you want to see another cool, but not as well known, spy museum drive up to Fort Meade and checkout the NSA SIGINT/Cryptological museum off of the GW parkway, about 30-45 mins by car out of DC or you can take the Metro to close by and ride a bus over:
http://www.nsa.gov/about/cryptologic_heritage/museum/virtual_tour/museum_tour_text.shtml
Some mentioned taxes but another reason is for social security pay outs. My father died when I was young and I was sent money from his social security (on behalf of my parents of course). So one reason is to ID beneficiaries.
I meant it, wasn't trying to troll if it came off that way. I like to joke a lot on here but I do commend them for giving us this site for so long. Where else can I cause so much trouble :D
Yes but I doubt RMS would have a problem with Ubuntu making a profit or focusing on it's customers as long as one can get access to the source without restriction and they give their work back to the community through said source code.
*Troll mode off *
In fairness to them it's really just a commentary and discussion site. Yes they're biased. But aren't we all? They post that way because It sparks conversation, which is the draw here. I like the threaded format and you can really find some "gold nuggets" of knowledge here. There are some very sharp guys that linger and post. Not as many as there used to be AFAIK but you still see a great rotation of good commentary.
And as long as the source code is provided how can people really object to their focus on things that make a profit? They need to survive and that means making money.
The article claims the company is unprofitable but how would anyone outside know if Canonical is profitable? Isn't it privately held? I've never heard of a private company publishing their numbers. I couldn't find any data to back up either side outside of rumor or hearsay. Does anyone have any info regarding this?
As long as this time around I can be the one to cash out I'm fine with it. I saw many millionaire developers driving Ferraris and when my time came it went to the birds. Such is life but a new bubble would be sweet for a lot of us. Is anyone really harmed when a fool parts with his money?
This is sooo easy actually. You just use tachyons and Geordi's visor with a quantum entaglement garage door opener.
Good point. If Hawking was from NYC would he speak twice as fast?
It's already installed. It's called the Vietnamese army.
You just highlighted the real issue. "Smart" people thinking they know what's best for everyone else. In America or is Vietnam it's all the same. Fucking nannies all around. Let me live my life.