Whipslash can confirm but I suspect it was necessary to keep the site afloat. It's ad funded and advertisers don't want their brands appearing next to that kind of stuff. So you either block it and their compliance bots are happy, or you find an ad network with lower standards and lower payouts.
Or it might just have been to reduce the amount of GNAA spam, but that clearly failed.
If Gab exists then why isn't that enough? You don't say specifically but your argument seems to be that YouTube is the most popular service so should be forced to publish videos.
Can you explain why it's so important to be on YouTube and Gab isn't good enough?
As for the bakery, it's obvious. Sexual orientation is a protected trait, gun enthusiast isn't.
Things definitely seemed to move faster. I was watching a video about the 8 bit ZX Spectrum today. It ended production in 1992, and by 1995 we had the Playstation. In comparison my current computers are mostly over 5 years old and the latest models are not really noticeably better for most tasks.
It normalises and encourages people to own guns. It drives sales of guns, and helps the NRA. It's indirect but it's there.
You could argue that instructional videos improve gun safety, but are people really using YouTube for safety lessons and given the quality of content on there is that a good thing?
It's a shame because there are genuine issues here, for men as well as women. But we get low quality stories like this that throw out some half baked survey and don't add anything meaningful to the debate.
Maybe. But what happens when the next election comes up, Trump calls his opponent a crook, claims the whole election is rigged and most Democrat voters are undocumented immigrants etc.
Interesting that it couldn't see her in the shadows, which suggests that it isn't using lidar for pedestrian detection, or at least not in that direction. Lidar isn't affected by shadows as it illuminates the object itself.
That sounds more like an error, than planned action.
Tesla autopilot isn't designed for that kind of avoidance. It's a driving aid that keeps you in a lane and at a constant speed. It can only change lanes when the driver tells it to.
More likely the other car obscured its view of the road markings, and it suddenly thought it was way off the centre line for the lane and moved over. The only emergency action autopilot is designed to take is braking.
They had to, because news is worthless. With the aggregation services the facts are quickly disseminated everywhere and available for free, so why would anyone pay to read day old facts in a newspaper?
So newspapers moved to opinion, investigation and long form articles padded with, you guessed it, more opinion.
Very few will paid "thinking" jobs will ever have two people doing exactly the same work. But that is largely irrelevant anyway. Say one finishes faster, but does late nights and weekends... It's burn out something you would encourage with more money? What if the slower one was helping some other project stay on track for a couple of days, or mentoring?
If you want to create a shitty work environment where your employees are climbing over each other and incentivized to prioritize themselves over the team and the project then go ahead.
These problems are solved by wage transparency. The company can easily justify each salary based on experience and contributions. Abby discussion can be informed. It becomes impossible for them to rip people off with secrecy or job titles.
The important part that Trump's favourite media outlet left out is that she says they didn't break the rules. Cambridge appear to have broken at least UK law, possibly US law.
The created a Facebook app. It looked innocent, one of those stupid personality tests. But in the ToS that no-one read it said it would grab your private data AND the private data of your friends.
That last bit is definitely illegal. You can't agree to give up personal data on behalf of your friends. About 300k people took the test, 50m people's data was stolen.
How predictable that the first part would be a copy/paste what-about-ism.
If you have evidence that Obama's campaign did something wrong, post it. Tell the ICO, maybe they will look for those documents when they raid Cambridge tomorrow.
Are there any examples of where this has happened? Because there are lots of counter examples, e.g. entire counties where salaries are public information.
The information we have raises a lot of questions, the main one being how come the safety driver didn't prevent the accident. If a fully aware and concentrating human couldn't prevent it, it's harder to blame the machine. But of course we don't know that the driver was attentive, maybe thousands of antonymous miles makes people complacent.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure, but you could buy it new in 1992. The Amiga 1200 was brand new. The 16 bit console era was in full swing.
So you want to take away a private person's property and nationalise it, so that constitutional protections apply?
Even I'm not that much of a communist.
Whipslash can confirm but I suspect it was necessary to keep the site afloat. It's ad funded and advertisers don't want their brands appearing next to that kind of stuff. So you either block it and their compliance bots are happy, or you find an ad network with lower standards and lower payouts.
Or it might just have been to reduce the amount of GNAA spam, but that clearly failed.
If Gab exists then why isn't that enough? You don't say specifically but your argument seems to be that YouTube is the most popular service so should be forced to publish videos.
Can you explain why it's so important to be on YouTube and Gab isn't good enough?
As for the bakery, it's obvious. Sexual orientation is a protected trait, gun enthusiast isn't.
Things definitely seemed to move faster. I was watching a video about the 8 bit ZX Spectrum today. It ended production in 1992, and by 1995 we had the Playstation. In comparison my current computers are mostly over 5 years old and the latest models are not really noticeably better for most tasks.
It normalises and encourages people to own guns. It drives sales of guns, and helps the NRA. It's indirect but it's there.
You could argue that instructional videos improve gun safety, but are people really using YouTube for safety lessons and given the quality of content on there is that a good thing?
Did you also quit Slashdot when they censored the n word?
It's a shame because there are genuine issues here, for men as well as women. But we get low quality stories like this that throw out some half baked survey and don't add anything meaningful to the debate.
I know what the first thing they will search for on YouTube is too.
https://www.youtube.com/result...
They are a British company. They very likely broke British law.
Having said that, isn't foreign interference in US elections illegal?
Trump can be voted out.
Maybe. But what happens when the next election comes up, Trump calls his opponent a crook, claims the whole election is rigged and most Democrat voters are undocumented immigrants etc.
Be very, very vigilant.
Interesting that it couldn't see her in the shadows, which suggests that it isn't using lidar for pedestrian detection, or at least not in that direction. Lidar isn't affected by shadows as it illuminates the object itself.
That sounds more like an error, than planned action.
Tesla autopilot isn't designed for that kind of avoidance. It's a driving aid that keeps you in a lane and at a constant speed. It can only change lanes when the driver tells it to.
More likely the other car obscured its view of the road markings, and it suddenly thought it was way off the centre line for the lane and moved over. The only emergency action autopilot is designed to take is braking.
That sign is so small I'd have to cross the road to read it, and then I'd be standing on the bit it says not to stand on.
They had to, because news is worthless. With the aggregation services the facts are quickly disseminated everywhere and available for free, so why would anyone pay to read day old facts in a newspaper?
So newspapers moved to opinion, investigation and long form articles padded with, you guessed it, more opinion.
There are also the tapes C4 released, where they talk about setting up political rivals with honeypots and the like.
Very few will paid "thinking" jobs will ever have two people doing exactly the same work. But that is largely irrelevant anyway. Say one finishes faster, but does late nights and weekends... It's burn out something you would encourage with more money? What if the slower one was helping some other project stay on track for a couple of days, or mentoring?
If you want to create a shitty work environment where your employees are climbing over each other and incentivized to prioritize themselves over the team and the project then go ahead.
These problems are solved by wage transparency. The company can easily justify each salary based on experience and contributions. Abby discussion can be informed. It becomes impossible for them to rip people off with secrecy or job titles.
Data Protection Act. EU rules on personal data are much stricter. The ICO is applying for a warrant to raid them today.
The important part that Trump's favourite media outlet left out is that she says they didn't break the rules. Cambridge appear to have broken at least UK law, possibly US law.
If it was just the person who used the app it would be okay, at least legally. But it's their friends as well. Friends who didn't agree to anything.
The created a Facebook app. It looked innocent, one of those stupid personality tests. But in the ToS that no-one read it said it would grab your private data AND the private data of your friends.
That last bit is definitely illegal. You can't agree to give up personal data on behalf of your friends. About 300k people took the test, 50m people's data was stolen.
How predictable that the first part would be a copy/paste what-about-ism.
If you have evidence that Obama's campaign did something wrong, post it. Tell the ICO, maybe they will look for those documents when they raid Cambridge tomorrow.
Are there any examples of where this has happened? Because there are lots of counter examples, e.g. entire counties where salaries are public information.
The information we have raises a lot of questions, the main one being how come the safety driver didn't prevent the accident. If a fully aware and concentrating human couldn't prevent it, it's harder to blame the machine. But of course we don't know that the driver was attentive, maybe thousands of antonymous miles makes people complacent.