Dual stack has not failed - it's the only sensible way to migrate to IPv6.
- Today, the Internet consist of two logical networks, IPv4 and IPv6
- Currently few customers are conected to both networks, but that will change in 2011 av beyond
- In the future (20-100 years?), only IPv6 will be needed
- By running dual stack on the PC/Server, the DNS will resolve which logical network you will use to access services
- By running dual stack, you will (over time) migrate traffic from IPv4 to IPv6, and you don't have to bother that this process is going on.
- By running av 6to4 tunnel, you never get rid of IPv4 (which eventually is not needed any more), so the tunneled access to IPv6 is a bad idea
The dual stack adoption rate has been slow because of
- Lack of SOHO routers with dual stack support (still a problem for $100 routers), but this is expected to change in 2011
- Lack of ISP routers capable of doing IPv6 in hardware (this problem is mostly solved now, but ISPs must invest in new routers, particularly at the edge of the network)
- Lack of demand from customers - they have so far got IPv4 addresses...
- ISPs have only recently enabled dual stack in their core network, a configuration thing really
Lack of IPv4 addresses will lead to IPv6 migration
- Lack of IPv4 adresses will lead to NAT-ing of IPv4 for new customers which will have impact on services
- Only IPv6 will provide you with ENOUGH public IP adresses (NOT-NATED)
- Most ISPs are now ready with dual stack IPv4/IPv6 (I work for an ISP, so I know this)
- Dual stack is not complicated, migration is toughest for those customers that can't software upgrade their firewall,
beacause they must convert the firewall policies which can be complicated
- Those who will provide services will serve on both IPv4 and IPv6
What's missing
- Google, Youtube and others should annonce NEW services on IPv6 2-4 weeks before they do on IPv4, that would lead to IPv6 demand
- At the moment, IPv4 and IPv6 are to separate networks that lead to the same supermarkets - with the same products. This is bad
- IPv6 supermarkets should be more sexy
At the end
- Lots of public IP addresses are needed per user in the future, only IPv6 can provide us with all these addresses
- Dual stack is the ideal way to migrate to IPv6, the DNS will migrate trafiic from IPv4 to IPv6 over time.
Dual stack has not failed - it's the only sensible way to migrate to IPv6. - Today, the Internet consist of two logical networks, IPv4 and IPv6 - Currently few customers are conected to both networks, but that will change in 2011 av beyond - In the future (20-100 years?), only IPv6 will be needed - By running dual stack on the PC/Server, the DNS will resolve which logical network you will use to access services - By running dual stack, you will (over time) migrate traffic from IPv4 to IPv6, and you don't have to bother that this process is going on. - By running av 6to4 tunnel, you never get rid of IPv4 (which eventually is not needed any more), so the tunneled access to IPv6 is a bad idea The dual stack adoption rate has been slow because of - Lack of SOHO routers with dual stack support (still a problem for $100 routers), but this is expected to change in 2011 - Lack of ISP routers capable of doing IPv6 in hardware (this problem is mostly solved now, but ISPs must invest in new routers, particularly at the edge of the network) - Lack of demand from customers - they have so far got IPv4 addresses ...
- ISPs have only recently enabled dual stack in their core network, a configuration thing really
Lack of IPv4 addresses will lead to IPv6 migration
- Lack of IPv4 adresses will lead to NAT-ing of IPv4 for new customers which will have impact on services
- Only IPv6 will provide you with ENOUGH public IP adresses (NOT-NATED)
- Most ISPs are now ready with dual stack IPv4/IPv6 (I work for an ISP, so I know this)
- Dual stack is not complicated, migration is toughest for those customers that can't software upgrade their firewall,
beacause they must convert the firewall policies which can be complicated
- Those who will provide services will serve on both IPv4 and IPv6
What's missing
- Google, Youtube and others should annonce NEW services on IPv6 2-4 weeks before they do on IPv4, that would lead to IPv6 demand
- At the moment, IPv4 and IPv6 are to separate networks that lead to the same supermarkets - with the same products. This is bad
- IPv6 supermarkets should be more sexy
At the end
- Lots of public IP addresses are needed per user in the future, only IPv6 can provide us with all these addresses
- Dual stack is the ideal way to migrate to IPv6, the DNS will migrate trafiic from IPv4 to IPv6 over time.