I agree wholeheartedly -- this should be an entire article.
There's little doubt this is a violation of the GPL. Sure, it's a well-meaning violation by nice guys, but a violation nonetheless. It sets a bad precedent and should be treated like any other GPL violation.
I agree wholeheartedly -- this should be an entire article.
There's little doubt this is a violation of the GPL. Sure, it's a well-meaning violation by nice guys, but a violation nonetheless. It sets a bad precedent and should be treated like any other GPL violation.