http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/sqso /c sdni_wp.htm You mean NAC, network admission control. The CTA, Cisco Trust Agent, is the piece that actually runs on the host, to help defend the network from the host.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/p s5 057/ In contrast to CTA, CSA, Cisco Security Agent, focuses on protecting the host from the network.
The difference is host vs. network intrusion prevention.
First you complained that Sun's patches would overwrite your changes. Then you complained that HP's patches refused to overwrite your changes.
Assuming that your homegrown upgrades involved overwriting the files instead building replacement packages, how is each package system supposed to know that the changes were intentional?
Google for the Joe Job: http://www.google.com/search?q=joe%20job
This is a good reason why you should not reject mail based on the From: header in your mail client. Even the envelope can be spoofed. If you feel compelled to reject spam, bounce them at the outer-most perimeter of your mail network.
(Correction from my prior post.)
o /c sdni_wp.htm
p s5 057/
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/sqs
You mean NAC, network admission control.
The CTA, Cisco Trust Agent, is the piece that actually runs on the host, to help defend the network from the host.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/
In contrast to CTA, CSA, Cisco Security Agent, focuses on protecting the host from the network.
The difference is host vs. network intrusion prevention.
You mean NAC, network access control.
o /c sdni_wp.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/sqs
First you complained that Sun's patches would overwrite your changes. Then you complained that HP's patches refused to overwrite your changes.
Assuming that your homegrown upgrades involved overwriting the files instead building replacement packages, how is each package system supposed to know that the changes were intentional?
Google for the Joe Job:
http://www.google.com/search?q=joe%20job
This is a good reason why you should not reject mail based on the From: header in your mail client. Even the envelope can be spoofed. If you feel compelled to reject spam, bounce them at the outer-most perimeter of your mail network.