Slashdot Mirror


User: theweatherelectric

theweatherelectric's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
630
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 630

  1. There's some suspicion

    Your suspicions are laughable and false.

  2. Re:Yes on Slashdot Asks: Have You Switched To Firefox 57? · · Score: 0

    NoScript - "but it will be out later today!" only works for so long

    Right, it works until it's released later this week.

    DownThemAll

    The WebExtensions version of DownThemAll is in development. Had Nils done that earlier instead of throwing a temper tantrum a year ago, you'd have DownThemAll by now.

  3. Re:Nope, switched to chrome on Slashdot Asks: Have You Switched To Firefox 57? · · Score: 5, Informative

    give in and switch to the path of least resistance

    Which is.. to keep using Firefox? Firefox's WebExtensions API offers more than Chrome's does (see the browser comparison tables). The claims that Firefox is a "Chrome clone" are silly.

    uBlock Origin works better in Firefox 57 than possible in Chrome (gorhill is the developer of uBlock Origin). Firefox's webRequest API was extended for NoScript's use (and it will use it when it gets released in a couple of days).

  4. like shit on a blanket

    Dude, I think you need a training course in how to sleep. I'm confident you're doing it wrong.

  5. Re:WHERE NoScript??? on Google Returns As Default Search Engine In Firefox (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 5, Informative

    NoScript's current release state. It was going to be released today but now it's a couple of days away.

  6. Re:Obligatory Google Flame on Google Returns As Default Search Engine In Firefox (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck Google.

    I'd advise against it. Google doesn't cuddle, doesn't call, but creepily stalks you afterward.

  7. Re:FF57: Me said to Myself on Firefox Quantum Arrives With Faster Browser Engine, Major Visual Overhaul (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 1

    me: NoScript, Classic theme restorer, Cutebuttons, Hide Tab Bar, Status-4-Evar, Tabs on bottom, etc

    NoScript is on the way. You can modify the UI in the Classic Theme Restorer style with CSS and similarly for CuteButtons.

  8. You treat Firefox users so terribly.

    Maybe it's just the language barrier.

  9. Re:Little functionality lost on Firefox Quantum Arrives With Faster Browser Engine, Major Visual Overhaul (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 1

    Can you point me to the appropriate place to complain to the Classic Theme Restorer people?

    Here you go.

  10. Re:Tree Style Tabs ported on Firefox 57 Brings Better Sandboxing on Linux (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    I wish Video DownloadHelper would get ported

    Version 7 has been released with Firefox 57 support.

  11. Re: Weird Gaps? on Firefox Quantum Arrives With Faster Browser Engine, Major Visual Overhaul (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 5, Informative

    but the tab coloring SUCKS

    You can pick a different theme in the Customize settings. Firefox ships with three themes (Default, Light, and Dark). I use the Light theme.

  12. it might be the end of Firefox

    Unlikely. Just relax. You'll feel better.

  13. gobs of blank space in the toolbar for no reason

    You can use the Customize tool to customize the interface and remove the blank space. Either right-click in the space on the toolbar and select Customize or go via the Hamburger menu -> Customize.

  14. witnessing 11/14 as the day the web was lost.

    Boohoo. We're doomed! I have only 6,231 add-ons to choose from with more being added every day. How ever will I survive?

  15. Oh noes. Don't be a Debbie Downer. Tweet the praise yourself.

  16. Re:It's NO GO since noscript is DOA on Firefox Quantum Arrives With Faster Browser Engine, Major Visual Overhaul (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 3, Informative

    NoScript for Firefox 57 will be released today. Just wait a while.

  17. Re:Extensions, though :-( on Firefox Quantum Arrives With Faster Browser Engine, Major Visual Overhaul (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It disabled NoScript.

    NoScript for Firefox 57 will be released today. Don't worry, be happy.

  18. Re:Chrome & Safari are only browsers that matt on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    But not changing the rendering engine.

    That isn't the case. You should read about the changes in 57 and the changes to come

  19. Re:This is great but. on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    we will no longer be able to monitor and audit the content of web pages and the scripts.

    False. Read the FAQ.

  20. Re:Worst idea ever. on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    which the end user won't be able to access anymore

    No. You can view source on WebAssembly modules. Also see the FAQ.

  21. Re: You got your C code in my browser! on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    That sounds like a frequently asked question.

  22. Re: Firefoxalypse on Firefox 57 Brings Better Sandboxing on Linux (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    The developer of It's All Text recommends emacs chrome or GhostText.

  23. Re:Too little too late. on Firefox 57 Brings Better Sandboxing on Linux (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    The next step is to dig up

    No, the next step is to get Adobe to release a WebAssembly build of the Flash run time. And if Adobe doesn't care about Flash enough to do that then tough luck, kid.

    It seems like you're in stage 3 of grief: bargaining.

  24. Re:Chrome & Safari are only browsers that matt on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 2

    Firefox, Opera and Vivaldi barely register.

    So change that. Apathy is useless. Use Firefox or Opera or Vivaldi.

  25. Original Article on All Major Browsers Now Support WebAssembly (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Better to get content from the source. BleepingComputer appears to just read Mozilla blogs and repackage them as its own. Here's the original Mozilla blog post.