This is a misguided argument. The argument to say God created everything does not eliminate the possibility of evolution. Neither does it diminish the interest that people have in the biology of the things that He created. The two are not connected in the attempt used to imply that those who believe in God do not respect and or even participate in science. It hurts the academic community when people allow their emotions to enter into the conversation in either direction.
The bill says nothing about how research should be conducted. It only proposes that they can't be discriminated against. Which is already covered by the U.S. Constitution and other laws. The law is redundant, but the argument stated above is not accurate, helpful, or even shows a handle on the material involved. I encourage you to spend more time researching.
Slashdot Mirror
This is a misguided argument. The argument to say God created everything does not eliminate the possibility of evolution. Neither does it diminish the interest that people have in the biology of the things that He created. The two are not connected in the attempt used to imply that those who believe in God do not respect and or even participate in science. It hurts the academic community when people allow their emotions to enter into the conversation in either direction. The bill says nothing about how research should be conducted. It only proposes that they can't be discriminated against. Which is already covered by the U.S. Constitution and other laws. The law is redundant, but the argument stated above is not accurate, helpful, or even shows a handle on the material involved. I encourage you to spend more time researching.
You make it sounds like scientists were always right.