The new Compaq ML-series servers have 64-bit slots. You can get one of these servers for around $3k, which isn't too bad if you're considering implementing this technology.
It seems that this action gives businesses more of a stranglehold on the Internet. If NSI auctions these domains off, they give large corporations with deeper pockets a better chance to get the domain names they want. This would include the domain selling "services" like Greatdomains.com a chance to snatch up these domain names. I view this in the same way that used car dealerships buy all the cars at "public government auctions" for their own reselling purposes. However, this doesn't erase the fact that the individuals/groups affected should pay their bills.
"If my personal data were legally considered to be my property, then every time I gave my personal information to someone, I could insist that they only use it in certain ways, not share it with others, delete it at a certain time, and even that they pay me for it."
It's funny that you mention this. Property rights are the same excuse employers are using in order to fire someone who sends an unappreciated amount or type of e-mail using their system. As a firewall administrator for a large corporation, I can tell you that companies live by this rule. It appears that the courts are agreeing with its corporate partners. While it may be true that employers cannot listen to private conversations on a telephone, it appears that the laws do not apply to e-mail. I strike that one up to the technologically inept government some of us share.
I am currently trying to fight this rule inside my workplace. I know it's a losing battle because of the court cases but when a disclaimer is added to an e-mail that states something to the effect of this message is meant only for the person sending and the person addressed but we're still monitoring that same message, I find this quite misleading and to me seems grounds for a lawsuit.
I tend to view slashdot readers as anti-corporate but in this case, you're right about your concerns. Hopefully the privacy laws will change but it doesn't appear it'll happen anytime soon.
Slashdot Mirror
The new Compaq ML-series servers have 64-bit slots. You can get one of these servers for around $3k, which isn't too bad if you're considering implementing this technology.
It seems that this action gives businesses more of a stranglehold on the Internet. If NSI auctions these domains off, they give large corporations with deeper pockets a better chance to get the domain names they want. This would include the domain selling "services" like Greatdomains.com a chance to snatch up these domain names. I view this in the same way that used car dealerships buy all the cars at "public government auctions" for their own reselling purposes. However, this doesn't erase the fact that the individuals/groups affected should pay their bills.
You can read about this "cybersquatting" incident here.
"If my personal data were legally considered to be my property, then every time I gave my personal information to someone, I could insist that they only use it in certain ways, not share it with others, delete it at a certain time, and even that they pay me for it."
It's funny that you mention this. Property rights are the same excuse employers are using in order to fire someone who sends an unappreciated amount or type of e-mail using their system. As a firewall administrator for a large corporation, I can tell you that companies live by this rule. It appears that the courts are agreeing with its corporate partners. While it may be true that employers cannot listen to private conversations on a telephone, it appears that the laws do not apply to e-mail. I strike that one up to the technologically inept government some of us share.
I am currently trying to fight this rule inside my workplace. I know it's a losing battle because of the court cases but when a disclaimer is added to an e-mail that states something to the effect of this message is meant only for the person sending and the person addressed but we're still monitoring that same message, I find this quite misleading and to me seems grounds for a lawsuit.
I tend to view slashdot readers as anti-corporate but in this case, you're right about your concerns. Hopefully the privacy laws will change but it doesn't appear it'll happen anytime soon.