Slashdot Mirror


User: blameless

blameless's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
160
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 160

  1. Congress sucks. on CNet On Online Freedom · · Score: 1

    This is bullshit.

    As many laws as those clowns in Congress make each year to protect big businesses, you'd think they'd find time to help protect the Constitution.


  2. Re:Safer?? on FBI's Wiretapping Demands May Nix Verio Deal · · Score: 1

    Why haven't you been moderated down yet?


  3. Re:Indifferent on FBI's Wiretapping Demands May Nix Verio Deal · · Score: 1

    The government already has the ability to wiretap. This measure would only make it easier for them.

    As far as the manpower issue goes, there's more than enough processor-power to make up for that.

    I agree that the Feds have not only the right, but an obligation to stop threats to our national security - I just don't think that's what this proposal is all about.


  4. Re:Indifferent on FBI's Wiretapping Demands May Nix Verio Deal · · Score: 1

    What exactly do you feel would be safer?

    Do you think the government's ability to creep into your personal life will somehow protect you?

    From what? This measure would do nothing stop someone from assaulting, raping, killing, stealing, or any other crime the average American has to worry about.

    The only ones who will benefit are the Government & Corporate Thugs.


  5. Targeted billboards on Printing Out A New Monitor · · Score: 1

    It won't be long until DoubleClick will be able to change billboards on the fly, depending on the demographic that happens to be in the area...

  6. Re:Yeah... on Pete Townshend On Lifehouse, The Net, And Pirating · · Score: 1

    the dipshits who somehow manage to get into accidents on the interstate would probably have a much higher fatality rate when they do it in the air...

    That would be icing on the cake.


  7. Re:This one's easy... on Failed Dot-Coms Selling Private Info · · Score: 1

    Gee whiz...

    Just go to the mall.


  8. Re:This could be fixed on Failed Dot-Coms Selling Private Info · · Score: 1

    Why do they need our private info anyway?

    When we purchase something online, all the vendor really needs is a credit card # & expiration date. Couldn't the card issuer act as the 'information escrow', since they already have the data on file?


  9. Re:boo! on Failed Dot-Coms Selling Private Info · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be too sure about that. A company that sends unsolicited email in the first place obviously doesn't care whether you want to be on their mailing list.

    By attempting to remove yourself from their list, you've simply comfirmed that you actively use the address.


  10. Re:This could be fixed on Failed Dot-Coms Selling Private Info · · Score: 1

    Then we would have a huge amount of personal data, culled from various sources, under the control of a handful of vendors.

    What happens when Steve Case decides Verisign would make a nice addition to AOL's portfolio?

    No thanks.

    As much as I hate to admit it, we need some sort of legislation here.