Slashdot Mirror


User: gTsiros

gTsiros's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
438
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 438

  1. Re:Stability is NOT achieved that way. on Hobby Humanoid Robot KHR3HV Rides Bike At 10k/h · · Score: 1

    neither :) he implies that the "only proper" way to enjoy a bike is up on one :)

  2. Re:That's not direct democracy on A Digital Direct Democracy For the Modern Age · · Score: 1

    democracy hasn't got to do with voting.

    the main idea about democracy is that people DISCUSS the issues between themselves.

    this is a point that is lost on almost everyone.

    democracy is impossible when there are SO MANY PEOPLE in a community. That is why those who wrote the US constitution tried to offset this problem by creating the states. This idea draws HEAVILY from the achaean league http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaean_League which was the evolution of democracy, trying to offset the main proble of great populations

    once again: it's not the voting that is of great importance. it is discussing the problems of the community. If that can't be done, it doesn't matter if you vote or not

  3. Re:kid in front, semi in the back. on How Google's Autonomous Vehicles Work · · Score: 1

    i should have written "someone who is behind you *must* be at a safe distance to stop even if you somehow stop on the spot" but i decided not to at the last moment because

    turns out, i should have. because it happened.

    also: "Some might argue that I should have been far enough back to allow for even an instantaneous stop in front of me, but it's not really feasible to leave a gap that large during rush hour." I have yet to see rush hour traffic where you go fast enough that you can't stop in time. if traffic is fast enough so that you can't stop in time, it is not rush hour traffic. and yeah, if you want to be safe, you *will* keep on letting a gap big enough *even* with idiots getting in between. the alternative (approaching dangerously close) is not really a good option.

    or you can pay attention two or three cars ahead of you

  4. Re:kid in front, semi in the back. on How Google's Autonomous Vehicles Work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the kid/granny in front of you are not at fault. if you hit them you are at fault.

    someone who is behind you *must* be at a safe distance to stop even if you perform emergency braking. if they hit you, they are at fault.

    fill the rest yourself. in short you are just plain wrong. and dangerous.

  5. Re:But... on How Google's Autonomous Vehicles Work · · Score: 1

    you are the cause of the problems, then; not the TC.

  6. Re:Relaxing is subjective on "World's Most Relaxing Music" Composed · · Score: 1

    screaming hell music? hmmm... do me a favor will you? can you tell me what her opinion is about music like... say... The Betrayal by Fleshgod Apocalypse. Or Vampire from Nazareth by Septic Flesh?

    just curious

  7. Re:Go go Google on Google Expected to Settle Over Drug Ads, to the Tune of $500M · · Score: 2

    drugs are controlled with prescriptions, because otherwise people would scarf down whatever they wanted. Imagine people eating antibiotics like candy? Where would this lead? or antipsychotics? Oh i think i have $whatever let me get some promadiazepam or whatsitsname

  8. Re:flash is malware/adware on Google Engineers Deny Hack Exploited Chrome · · Score: 1

    needs it for sound

  9. Re:Alternatives? on Microsoft Buying Skype for $8.5B · · Score: 1

    shouldn't be too hard to do encryption

  10. Re:crazy on Peugeot EX1 Sets Electric Car Lap Record At Nuerburgring · · Score: 1

    There are motorcycles, mopeds and small engine motorcycles, not to mention public transit.

    think about something else rather than your convenience for a change.

    i read sometime/someplace about some dude (paraphrasing) "i will not give up one comfort that i have left, therefore i will go o doing 100miles each working day to and fro work".

    comfort. that's what he was after. no, we are not here to "live comfortably". we are here to give effort and make this god forsaken place at least livable.

  11. Re:Most apps are racing stripes on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 1

    android is a bloody mess. just take a stroll at http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/list and look at the list of *defects* only. SMSs getting deleted en masse, delivery reports wrong, SD card corruption...

    compared with my 10+ year old hp48gx which has a single digit number of bugs (all of which you are able to circumvent with one liners, say instead of XRECV use > ).

    shoddy engineering. ... who the hell places the speakerphone on the REAR of the device? do i really want to project the sound *away* from me?

  12. Re:Most apps are racing stripes on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 1

    my *own* first PC was a celeron. the first computer i used was a grundy newbrain.

    > When I look at Android Market I see Tucows, you know the ancient shareware site? I see a car store filled with go-faster stripes and furry dice. When people are young or a tech is new they tend to go wild and add all sorts of crap that is useless for the wow of it. Remember when marguee and the blink tag were the hot new thing? When every pixel of a webpage had to have an animated gif?

    set aside most apps have spam in them.

    that's why i have only one market program installed: acrobat reader.

    wait, sorry: *had*. I swapped my sorry excuse for a cellphone motorola failstone for a $100 "featurephone".

  13. Re:Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 1

    yet it manages to not implement fucking SMS delivery notification properly, which is what a normal phone 10 years old could do. Set aside i don't trust it to send an sms to the proper receipient.

    plus, no coordinates are transmitted. The GPS sats don't send coordinates... how could they know your location anyway? So no.

    > identify any song you are currently hearing just by letting your phone listen too

    was (and is) a standard feature of $100 featurephones.

    Things you consider so amazing, i consider pointless gimmicks when the most basic things the PHONE should do, it doesn't do.

    quit licking google's bumhole. I could run a fullblown linux distro on this kind of hardware, yet on the milestone i was scrambling to find the 'record call' button... which doesn't exist. So i went to find a way to enter a text note? there is no builtin text editing option (there's a 'facebook app' though!). So something i could do with *three* different ways when i had the 5 year old windoze 5 htc wizard (keep the list of groceries that was coming through the phone) was nigh impossible on the top-of-the-line milestone.

  14. Re:Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 1

    > Why on earth you'd want to do those things with a tiny screen

    i can compile, assemble, debug dissassemble and decompile on my fucking calculator.

    a device with three orders of magnitude more powerful should do these without even a question.

    it's waste of hardware, at the very least.

  15. Re:Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 2

    Phones can do everything your first computer could.

    Can they, now? i mentioned 4 things i could do on my first computer that i couldn't do on my milestone. I could make a bigger list, but it would be all for naught since you're not even reading.

  16. Re:Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 2

    And how can you differentiate between a "general purpose computer" that has an intel architecture, ram, a screen and a keyboard and a "phone" that has a more powerful cpu, more ram, a screen and a keyboard? It certainly has the horsepower, what does it do with it? ... nothing.

  17. Re:Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 2

    I could transcode video, compile a kernel, had an office suite, write code, etcetcet on 433MHz celeron with 128MB.

    the functionality-to-specifications ratio is abysmal.

    and don't get me started on what people pay for, today. A tea timer is an "app" ? I *pay* for that? For what i can do with my calculator and two lines of code? Or what my featurephone does on its own?

    It's a fucking joke.

  18. Progress on Google's Nexus S, A Look At Gingerbread · · Score: 2

    A machine with twice the firepower of my first computer but which can't do even half of what the computer did.

    yay.

  19. Re:CFLs are much good for heating on Activists Seek Repeal of Ban On Incandescent Bulbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what do you mean more efficient at heating?

    a 40W lamp in an enclosed, opaque space is exactly as efficient as a 40W heater in that same enclosed space.

  20. Re:PET/MRI and statistics are poor bed partners on Cell Phone Use Tied To Changes In Brain Activity · · Score: 1

    i'd say 50-100 grand is a small price to pay if we are to even get closer to a conclusion about whether a device used by billions of people is a significant health risk or not.

  21. Re:PET/MRI and statistics are poor bed partners on Cell Phone Use Tied To Changes In Brain Activity · · Score: 1

    (ironically this study was done with ionising radiation, whose cancer causing effects are well known).

    wait, what? how did they get the cellphone to emit ionizing radiation?!

  22. Re:"Knowing when its about to ring" on Cell Phone Use Tied To Changes In Brain Activity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and do you count the times where you look at your cellphone without it ringing later on?

  23. Re:So why run QNX? on BlackBerry Devices May Run Android Apps · · Score: 1
  24. Re:Did someone with IBM help them? on BlackBerry Devices May Run Android Apps · · Score: 1

    are we talking about compliant, or compatible?

    because WINE is implementing the win32 specs more accurately than microsoft itself.

  25. Re:subject goes here on Moscow Has Eyes On WikiLeaks, Too · · Score: 1

    you don't get it.

    they don't *want* to cover it up.