I forgot to mention this, but after those cpu times i think it's "QUITE" obvious that 1) Nitrane is MUCH faster an is compleletly rewritten 2) Someone did a heck of alot of work on it to cut it's cpu use in half.
I'll go with the first one. Another thing as well play media say they researched this, but they think nullsoft has 20Mil?? nullsoft don't have 100,000 not alone 20 million:)
Maby no one thaught of this so i put the players to the test... The suspects are Winamp 0.2b (Based On Amp) Winamp 1.9 (Last Version Before Nitrane) Winamp 2.091 (Latest Release)
Wintop is in the ms powertoys
I played Ace of base cruel summer (just ripped and encoded it off one of my sisters cd's..)
All Players were running @ full quality.. Aka, winamp 1.9 had 64bit decoding on, winamp 2.91 was running as pentium cpu and was not using mmx acceleration.
Slashdot Mirror
I forgot to mention this, but after those cpu
:)
times i think it's "QUITE" obvious that
1) Nitrane is MUCH faster an is compleletly rewritten
2) Someone did a heck of alot of work on it to cut
it's cpu use in half.
I'll go with the first one. Another thing as well
play media say they researched this, but they
think nullsoft has 20Mil?? nullsoft don't have
100,000 not alone 20 million
Maby no one thaught of this so i put the players to the test... The suspects are
.2b 11%-13%
Winamp 0.2b (Based On Amp)
Winamp 1.9 (Last Version Before Nitrane)
Winamp 2.091 (Latest Release)
Wintop is in the ms powertoys
I played Ace of base cruel summer (just ripped and encoded it off one of my sisters cd's..)
The Cpu Times
Winamp
Winamp 1.91 9%-11%
Winamp 2.091 5%-6%
All Players were running @ full quality..
Aka, winamp 1.9 had 64bit decoding on, winamp 2.91 was running as pentium cpu and was not using mmx acceleration.
Juggie @ efnet