This was just a test of the Amazon Corporate Money-Sucker - Patent Pending.
Actually, I don't think what they did was bad at all. But I would like
to know what their official and full policy is. (Can anyone find it on
amazon? I couldn't.) So now will everyone go back to paying their Amazon
decided price for the Run Lola Run DVD, or will everyone pay the same?
Isn't there an obligation to inform users when they are part of a test -
could this be considered working for Amazon, albeit unknowingly?
This was just a test of the Amazon Corporate Money-Sucker - Patent Pending.
Actually, I don't think what they did was bad at all. But I would like to know what their official and full policy is. (Can anyone find it on amazon? I couldn't.) So now will everyone go back to paying their Amazon decided price for the Run Lola Run DVD, or will everyone pay the same? Isn't there an obligation to inform users when they are part of a test - could this be considered working for Amazon, albeit unknowingly?
Slashdot Mirror
It's always funny when some omnipotent being rearranges your habitat when you aren't looking :)
Actually, I don't think what they did was bad at all. But I would like to know what their official and full policy is. (Can anyone find it on amazon? I couldn't.) So now will everyone go back to paying their Amazon decided price for the Run Lola Run DVD, or will everyone pay the same? Isn't there an obligation to inform users when they are part of a test - could this be considered working for Amazon, albeit unknowingly?
Actually, I don't think what they did was bad at all. But I would like to know what their official and full policy is. (Can anyone find it on amazon? I couldn't.) So now will everyone go back to paying their Amazon decided price for the Run Lola Run DVD, or will everyone pay the same? Isn't there an obligation to inform users when they are part of a test - could this be considered working for Amazon, albeit unknowingly?