Does anybody else find it the least bit amusing that the C|NET article (link from summary @ linuxworld) includes a quote along the lines of "Interest in Linux will fade when Microsoft ships its first service pack for Windows 2000 server."?
Why not have an OS that comes out with patches soon enough to make a difference?
I think that the people who make the server platform decisions know enough to realize that Windows 2000 is not the ideal route, and will attempt to phase it out even before it arrives.
Slashdot Mirror
Nonononono. You've got it all wrong. VTEC stickers and putting rice in the gas tank make your car go faster. Duh.
Ummmm, not to be a prude, but why do you want Photoshop for Linux when you've got the GIMP for free?
Does anybody else find it the least bit amusing that the C|NET article (link from summary @ linuxworld) includes a quote along the lines of "Interest in Linux will fade when Microsoft ships its first service pack for Windows 2000 server."?
Why not have an OS that comes out with patches soon enough to make a difference?
I think that the people who make the server platform decisions know enough to realize that Windows 2000 is not the ideal route, and will attempt to phase it out even before it arrives.