I don't care about MPAA. If MI-2 is good, I'm gonna watch it wheter it's MPAA or not. Same thing with music and RIAA. Metallica's actions may suck but it doesn't change the fact that their older albums are good.
Maybe you could assign projects in team. Like 10 people working on a unique project instead of each working individually.
You might also hand them a general problem with not too much details and let them create a solution. That's how it works in my engineering faculty: we have a vague problem and we create a solution ourself with minimal support from the teacher.
Avoid those kinds of "exercices" problem. Think of something that will take longer to do and more interessting. Situation where you have a lot of freedom to design your solutions are always interesting. Plus, you learn a lot in the process.
Of course moron the load balancer does not use the same OS as the webserver. Real load balancer from Cisco and others run their own internal OS. That's how it's done.
Did you try it yourself ? NT4 was stable. I crashed only 3 or 4 times in a full year on my computer. Don't make any claim about something you never tried.
You obviously don't know anything about marketing. Technicals merits only sells to techies. Look at how Mozilla look. The mere fact that it is ugly is enough to make people use something else.
Let's face it: The vast majority of computers users and don't know how the whole thing works. That's why they need Windows. Also, Linux lacks of apps. What do you do when you need to read an Office 2000 file, or need to draw plans on a real CAD system like Catia and AutoCAD ? People want to share documents with everyone. If they use Linux, they cannot do that. I happen to use Linux only when needed. Last winter I had a programming course on unix. I was happy to have linux and gcc: it avoided me to rush to the SparcStation labs. But beside some niche applications, I don't think Linux will succeed on the desktop.
Why some poeple waster their time writing a windows clone ? I mean if you want Windows, buy the damn thing and take your time to develop something else
A good stenography technique might be to mix a little bit of white noise in a 16 bit sound file. Then you put your data in the last bit of each 16 bit sample. Since encrypted data looks like noise and there is actually white noise in the sound file, there are good chances that your encrypted file would go undetected.
A possible solution is to move your web site offshore.
Montreal based ZeroKnowledge company (www.zeroknowledge.com) is producing a software called Freedom which should be usefull for people living in countries without freedom of speech. I think it routes your traffic through a dynamic network of secured sites.
Unless you're a dork wasting your time playing computer games instead of hanging out with chicks, drinking beer and getting laid, overclocking is not necessary these days with fast cheap processor like the AMD Duron.
What you want is a fast hard-disk and lots of RAM and that will do. Seriously I'm getting sick of these "Celeron 300 pushed to 973mhz" type of articles.
X-Window is a graphical shell on top of a 20+ year old unix code base
Finally, I found a sane person on Slashdot !!!
Duh? You need to know differential calculus for this!!! HS student don't have it
I don't care about MPAA. If MI-2 is good, I'm gonna watch it wheter it's MPAA or not. Same thing with music and RIAA. Metallica's actions may suck but it doesn't change the fact that their older albums are good.
You might also hand them a general problem with not too much details and let them create a solution. That's how it works in my engineering faculty: we have a vague problem and we create a solution ourself with minimal support from the teacher.
Avoid those kinds of "exercices" problem. Think of something that will take longer to do and more interessting. Situation where you have a lot of freedom to design your solutions are always interesting. Plus, you learn a lot in the process.
So..... what's wrong with trying to compete with other companies ? If Nokia was the only maker of cell phones, prices would be to high...
In business, you need to be a visionnary to be sucessful.
If you wait until the demand is there, it's too late: someone already jumped on the opportunities. So you don't wait for the demand, you *create* it.
If you create a demand and fullfill it, you'll be succesfull. That's what Ericsson and RedHat want to do.
while (1)
{
wget "http://www.slashdot.org/"
}
By the way why can't Slashdot convert CR to
tags, it's sucks to write those
when you want a new line.
huh stupid these are used as desktop computer, so the user must have Admin rights on its own machine
Of course moron the load balancer does not use the same OS as the webserver. Real load balancer from Cisco and others run their own internal OS. That's how it's done.
Why "prior to SP6a" ?
You run the latest linux kernel, so why not be fair and use the latest SP6a ?
Did you try it yourself ? NT4 was stable. I crashed only 3 or 4 times in a full year on my computer. Don't make any claim about something you never tried.
That's not true. Take for example printers.
You obviously don't know anything about marketing. Technicals merits only sells to techies. Look at how Mozilla look. The mere fact that it is ugly is enough to make people use something else.
Let's face it: The vast majority of computers users and don't know how the whole thing works. That's why they need Windows. Also, Linux lacks of apps. What do you do when you need to read an Office 2000 file, or need to draw plans on a real CAD system like Catia and AutoCAD ? People want to share documents with everyone. If they use Linux, they cannot do that. I happen to use Linux only when needed. Last winter I had a programming course on unix. I was happy to have linux and gcc: it avoided me to rush to the SparcStation labs. But beside some niche applications, I don't think Linux will succeed on the desktop.
Why some poeple waster their time writing a windows clone ? I mean if you want Windows, buy the damn thing and take your time to develop something else
What's new in KDE 2.0 ?
A good stenography technique might be to mix a little bit of white noise in a 16 bit sound file. Then you put your data in the last bit of each 16 bit sample. Since encrypted data looks like noise and there is actually white noise in the sound file, there are good chances that your encrypted file would go undetected.
And if using encryption products is illegal, what can you do ? And you can't hide the encrypted stuff with stenography.
You guys forget that you're talking to normal user. They don't want to do what you're talking about...
Stenography is good if it's used with cryptography
A possible solution is to move your web site offshore.
Montreal based ZeroKnowledge company (www.zeroknowledge.com) is producing a software called Freedom which should be usefull for people living in countries without freedom of speech. I think it routes your traffic through a dynamic network of secured sites.
Seems to be good.
Unless you're a dork wasting your time playing computer games instead of hanging out with chicks, drinking beer and getting laid, overclocking is not necessary these days with fast cheap processor like the AMD Duron.
What you want is a fast hard-disk and lots of RAM and that will do. Seriously I'm getting sick of these "Celeron 300 pushed to 973mhz" type of articles.
These articles are not news!!!