It seems to be things that increase the viewable area. Like not allowing CSS definitions of 'empty-cells', 'line-height', and also somethings that disallow layering and DHTML like not having 'z-index'. It seems that implementing this shoddy level of CSS on a WAP device wouldn't be too difficult (remember that most WAPs are like fixed width terminals onscreen - they have little need for changing of line-height).
Regardless however they're going about it the wrong way. Making another CSS definition because the W3C think they know that you don't want an optional 'text-shadow' for a title -- it's condescending to current-day display technology that has made ground in recent years in regards to dotpitch, resolution, and of course colours.
I hope browser makers rebel against this shitty standard and support the full CSS spec.
WAP 1.0 sucks arse, WAP 2.0 is XHTML, which is a little better. Does anyone not like WAP2?
I recently lost a job to an older gentleman who uses Dreamweaver. More to the point he doesn't know HTML and doesn't know how to use Dreamweaver effectively.
In his test page for the job he used deeply nested tables with image mouseovers (breaks N3) and as I said, he got the job.
I hate you all. Bar the parent post, but everyone else, I hate you all.
Not necessarily. Analog video gaming usually means that a critical part of the game is based upon the output/measurement of a physical thing. Like an osiloscope, for example, that was used in early arcade games of pong.
I've read that Missle Command (city at night being bombarded while earth gun-turrets shot out the bombs before they hit a town) was analog.
A friend of mine used a pendulum for a game he built in the early 80s and the acceleration was measured which correlated to the spread of fire from the spaceship. He would immerse the pendulum in liquid when he was playing to lower the spread of fire and win. The bastard.
Oh, and so I don't dissapoint my audience, and i'm awfully sorry about this but hopefully you'll understand, you funt knuckle bsded poop-head
Piping is a deco flamer that died in the 70s. It looks like tripe and whats worse piping in this manner inhibits it's functional use (extra width for no good reason).
Don't mistake me, I think RH is arse too. Not because they're sucessful (hurrah to them for that!) but because they mislabel software. RH7 is fatally flawed in many ways and doesn't even have the stability of a regular point oh redhat release. I'd like to see redhat defend that rather than take it sideways into "but we're better than MS" teritory.
I installed a Rimu door, full finish, and tied a string up to a release mechanism for a blade. The string will only activate the release mechanism if someone breaks the door, that I installed. When released the blade will fall down and severe my balls.
Now do you find this admirable?
No?
Well you shouldn't. I'm an idiot that happens to rule the world with an iron fist. But Mr. Young here isn't putting his neck on the line - he won't suffer if people yell back, and when he puts Redhat 7 on a machine that's expected to stay up as long as any other previous release - and if it fails will severe his balls - then we'll see.
Inviting personal criticism is admirable and takes guts? Bah. Redhat has been getting incesantly bashed with this release and I doubt if this would add anything more to the fire.
In all honesty there are some people's jobs that are to respond and it's not divided in "[concentrating] on making good softwares rather than fencing off the criticism".
RH are good lads, RH7 should have waited a few weeks though.
This is a major flaw in the open source advocacy (no not open source, i'm not a troll today, just the way in which some people defend it). It's not laziness if I don't read gigs of source code, learn how it relates to itself, and find bugs and fix them - hell, I can do so why don't I?
It's common sense not to bother.
If 1% of computer users had the skill and knowledge to fix software - then 99% of people have to trust their distrbution not to have major flaws in their product.
The X days and Redhat7 will fallover bug is a bad one.
Redhat 7 isn't a toy that you found on an FTP site, it's being billed as commercial level software and being sold as a boxed edition.
Now we all know software never ships bug free. So the standard by which we measure software is the number of bugs and whether they should have released it.
Slashdot Mirror
Regardless however they're going about it the wrong way. Making another CSS definition because the W3C think they know that you don't want an optional 'text-shadow' for a title -- it's condescending to current-day display technology that has made ground in recent years in regards to dotpitch, resolution, and of course colours.
I hope browser makers rebel against this shitty standard and support the full CSS spec.
WAP 1.0 sucks arse, WAP 2.0 is XHTML, which is a little better. Does anyone not like WAP2?
Asswipe.
How fast is it compared to it's native OS?
Jeeves, get Nightboat ready, we're off to the gazza strip.
No, not that gazza strip, the other one.
After all, what's the king of the world for?
Leave them alone.
In his test page for the job he used deeply nested tables with image mouseovers (breaks N3) and as I said, he got the job.
I hate you all. Bar the parent post, but everyone else, I hate you all.
I've read that Missle Command (city at night being bombarded while earth gun-turrets shot out the bombs before they hit a town) was analog.
A friend of mine used a pendulum for a game he built in the early 80s and the acceleration was measured which correlated to the spread of fire from the spaceship. He would immerse the pendulum in liquid when he was playing to lower the spread of fire and win. The bastard.
Oh, and so I don't dissapoint my audience, and i'm awfully sorry about this but hopefully you'll understand, you funt knuckle bsded poop-head
Piping is a deco flamer that died in the 70s. It looks like tripe and whats worse piping in this manner inhibits it's functional use (extra width for no good reason).
It smells a bit (haven't had time to clean off the poop, you see) but it's working fine!
I agree, it looks like a strip of playdoh's been wrapped around it.
Then you have no taste, peasant.
Behind you Jim! He's got a knife!
Don't mistake me, I think RH is arse too. Not because they're sucessful (hurrah to them for that!) but because they mislabel software. RH7 is fatally flawed in many ways and doesn't even have the stability of a regular point oh redhat release. I'd like to see redhat defend that rather than take it sideways into "but we're better than MS" teritory.
Really? I thought people were bashing them because their distribution was buggy and should have been held back a few months. My mistake.
Well you can't have it, not until you say "please?"
I installed a Rimu door, full finish, and tied a string up to a release mechanism for a blade. The string will only activate the release mechanism if someone breaks the door, that I installed. When released the blade will fall down and severe my balls.
Now do you find this admirable?
No?
Well you shouldn't. I'm an idiot that happens to rule the world with an iron fist. But Mr. Young here isn't putting his neck on the line - he won't suffer if people yell back, and when he puts Redhat 7 on a machine that's expected to stay up as long as any other previous release - and if it fails will severe his balls - then we'll see.
Inviting personal criticism is admirable and takes guts? Bah. Redhat has been getting incesantly bashed with this release and I doubt if this would add anything more to the fire.
What a brilliant idea, oh, it's already been done.
Alas, it's true. But something keeps me awake at night smiling... oh that's right.
RH are good lads, RH7 should have waited a few weeks though.
This is a major flaw in the open source advocacy (no not open source, i'm not a troll today, just the way in which some people defend it). It's not laziness if I don't read gigs of source code, learn how it relates to itself, and find bugs and fix them - hell, I can do so why don't I?
It's common sense not to bother.
If 1% of computer users had the skill and knowledge to fix software - then 99% of people have to trust their distrbution not to have major flaws in their product.
The X days and Redhat7 will fallover bug is a bad one.
Redhat 7 isn't a toy that you found on an FTP site, it's being billed as commercial level software and being sold as a boxed edition.
Now we all know software never ships bug free. So the standard by which we measure software is the number of bugs and whether they should have released it.
I would say no.
Why am I trolling again?
Mostly he was trying to get the bicycle up a hill that had an embed escalator track for your foot, and the rider would be easily pushed to the summit.
Then I watched some pr0n.
I've got three keyboards in the warddrobe -- you know, if you want one.
(no I didn't write any of it, I just agree.)
The King of the World always posts with his name attached and never anonymously.