Your arguments are stupid, which is probably a result of your own innate stupidity.
The Jews took control of the land and created a country in the time-honored tradition of fighting a war and coming out on top. Thousands of nation states have come into existence that exact same way, including virtually every single Arab-dominated country in the world. Just because the Jews did it relatively recently does not mean their method was illegitimate.
The source of the Israeli-Arab conflict is rooted in the fact that Arabs can't stand losing to Jews. If the Kurds carved out a State in northern Iraq, the world would applaud it, and no one would consider it for another second. Only when Jews are involved do we need 2 UN organizations involved to keep the Arabs as perpetual "refugees".
If you make shit up, you probably have shit for brains. The British offered territory to Jews that did not include Jerusalem. There are no other sites in Israel that are holy to Islam. From day one, it was the Arabs that refused to live with Jews, not the other way around.
It's even worse than that -- before 1967, when Israel captured territory from a warring nation, the Arabs were content to be Jordanian citizens.
The Israeli-Arab conflict is predicated on the fact that Arabs cannot stand losing to Jews. That's it. Every single atrocity and "counter-"atrocity is predicated on that fact.
"Christ" means anointed. In Jewish (and thus Christian) tradition, the Messiah will (or was) an anointed leader/king. But "christ" does not mean messiah.
You were wrong before, and you're wrong here too. WoW64 serves a purpose, and most Windows Apps are not COM servers. I have no idea what warped fantasy you have regarding COM, but it's just that -- a fantasy.
The fun with the System and System32 folders was not done for source compatibility. It was done for programs that hardcoded the path/folder name instead of querying the system for it.
How do you know clean energy research is underfunded? Do you have some objective observations which prove that increased funding would yield more effective results sooner?
If you actually listened to the audio all the way through, they give the reason for asking. We don't know what would have happened if she had refused (as is her right), but to suggest things would have turned ugly is pure speculation.
The law does not apply to the Chinese, so even if every Constitutional scholar agreed with you (they don't), it would be irrelevant. Additionally, the speech is regulated, not abridged. All they have to do is register and they can spew whatever sewage they want (on the air).
If you don't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, you should probably go back to China and have the Party kill you for your ignorance and idiocy.
I hope someone exercises their Second Amendment right by putting a bullet through your skull.
What was that? You didn't realize that the Second Amendment doesn't read: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed unless it is used to shoot ShanghaiBill?
Please provide your well-researched legal backing for the implicit claim that this law is non Constitutional. The specific fora in which speech may be made have been regulated from the beginning, even after the first amendment was ratified.
Slashdot Mirror
Your arguments are stupid, which is probably a result of your own innate stupidity.
The Jews took control of the land and created a country in the time-honored tradition of fighting a war and coming out on top. Thousands of nation states have come into existence that exact same way, including virtually every single Arab-dominated country in the world. Just because the Jews did it relatively recently does not mean their method was illegitimate.
The source of the Israeli-Arab conflict is rooted in the fact that Arabs can't stand losing to Jews. If the Kurds carved out a State in northern Iraq, the world would applaud it, and no one would consider it for another second. Only when Jews are involved do we need 2 UN organizations involved to keep the Arabs as perpetual "refugees".
If you make shit up, you probably have shit for brains. The British offered territory to Jews that did not include Jerusalem. There are no other sites in Israel that are holy to Islam. From day one, it was the Arabs that refused to live with Jews, not the other way around.
It's even worse than that -- before 1967, when Israel captured territory from a warring nation, the Arabs were content to be Jordanian citizens.
The Israeli-Arab conflict is predicated on the fact that Arabs cannot stand losing to Jews. That's it. Every single atrocity and "counter-"atrocity is predicated on that fact.
"Christ" means anointed. In Jewish (and thus Christian) tradition, the Messiah will (or was) an anointed leader/king. But "christ" does not mean messiah.
Do you also find daylight to be amazing?
Legacy makes a mess when app developers are idiots. Which is always.
Or you could do some research and find out that it was done for backwards compatibility with binary-only programs.
You were wrong before, and you're wrong here too. WoW64 serves a purpose, and most Windows Apps are not COM servers. I have no idea what warped fantasy you have regarding COM, but it's just that -- a fantasy.
The fun with the System and System32 folders was not done for source compatibility. It was done for programs that hardcoded the path/folder name instead of querying the system for it.
The parent comment is more insightful and useful than the article.
How do you know clean energy research is underfunded? Do you have some objective observations which prove that increased funding would yield more effective results sooner?
That's an unsubstantiated claim.
In Soviet Russia, whoosh flies over you!
Windows 95 ran just fine on 4 MB. I did so on both 386 and 486 hardware, and it never felt particularly slow compared to the alternatives.
If you actually listened to the audio all the way through, they give the reason for asking. We don't know what would have happened if she had refused (as is her right), but to suggest things would have turned ugly is pure speculation.
No one sane relies on the Cloud provider to do proper backups. You still do that yourself, if you care.
Ah, the no-true-encryption fallacy.
All encryption is breakable, given enough time. Conversely, ROT-13 is encryption, even if it's rather poor.
The very first words of the Constitution read: We the people of the United States.
Registration is not abridgment. The GP is a fucking idiot, and should be pilloried at every opportunity.
The law does not apply to the Chinese, so even if every Constitutional scholar agreed with you (they don't), it would be irrelevant. Additionally, the speech is regulated, not abridged. All they have to do is register and they can spew whatever sewage they want (on the air).
Interestingly, the Constitution begins with the phrase We the people of the United States, thus establishing which "people" the document discusses.
If you don't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, you should probably go back to China and have the Party kill you for your ignorance and idiocy.
They admitted that they take a feed and broadcast it. It's not even their speech that is at issue.
I hope someone exercises their Second Amendment right by putting a bullet through your skull.
What was that? You didn't realize that the Second Amendment doesn't read: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed unless it is used to shoot ShanghaiBill?
Please provide your well-researched legal backing for the implicit claim that this law is non Constitutional. The specific fora in which speech may be made have been regulated from the beginning, even after the first amendment was ratified.