Before you contact Gnome foundation, how about first checking out if there were any AA candidates who were qualified and subsequently rejected by foundation.
Beside, AA constitute only 13 % of population and are not known for being overly involved with technology (as for example people with Asian ethnic background) so is this possible that lack of AA on this foundation might not be result of racism and you are simply too sensitive.
Diversity and lack of cooperation are roots of most problems in Italy...
How do we determine when to allow candidates to participate in TV debates ?
I understand you woudn't want to see every wacko who happened to start his little party bringing his message on TV ( somebody has to pay for it.)
In US currect limit is 15% support , if you got it, you will be included in the debates.
Why two is not enough ? How many political parties is enough ?
Who should decide that ?
People, of course, and that is the case in US. Anybody is free to start their own party and they do.
Everything else is in the hands of people.
Huh ?
Yeah, he apreciates he was able to make money that way, but since he is already set up for life, there is no reason to continue this "oppresive" practice.
"who presents a consistent view and actually has some credibility "
Give me a break. Nader made millions on technology stocks. He profited from 50+ h workweeks many geeks put in yet he is the one calling for 32 h workweek without salary cut.
One fucking credible fellow.
Yeah, why would I wan't greens to win anywhere ?
Just for the sake of creating valid third party ?
Have you look at their program ?
Half of this comes streight from communist manifesto.
"Gore really is the lesser of two evils, at least as far as energy & environmental policy is concerned. Do you really think Dubya will do squat about extinctions, pollution & global warming (at least until it's far too late)?"
Why should he ? Just because bunch of wackos are making living scaring people about this crap ?
Clinton was forced to sign this by Republican congress. Look at the timeline, he had 3 years to do so and nothing happened until congress was taken over by Reps.
", but under his administration the deficit was eliminated and wages began to rise"
Yeah, was eliminated despite Clinton and his administration. It was republican Congress which forced that issue on him.
Slashdot Mirror
Fuck that.
Germans wanted quality of life for themselves. It just happened to involve enslaving half of the Europe.
What the fuck is wrong with that ?
They make sure you are not one. You have that choice now.
I do hope that Bush appoints some conservatives for they are solely needed.
Hehehe..
That's the thing. With Nader crazy ideas the boss would not even had a choice of firing him.
NO, they should make sure that people who are unable to help themselves should not starve (disabled etc .) Everyone else is a fair game.
So they are there. Always been and always will.
Why should I pay for somebody unwiligness to better his own living ?
Why don't you just get your ass to some other place where people do nothing bu taking to the streets and enjoy newly found thrills.
Before you contact Gnome foundation, how about first checking out if there were any AA candidates who were qualified and subsequently rejected by foundation.
Beside, AA constitute only 13 % of population and are not known for being overly involved with technology (as for example people with Asian ethnic background) so is this possible that lack of AA on this foundation might not be result of racism and you are simply too sensitive.
Diversity and lack of cooperation are roots of most problems in Italy ...
How do we determine when to allow candidates to participate in TV debates ?
I understand you woudn't want to see every wacko who happened to start his little party bringing his message on TV ( somebody has to pay for it.)
In US currect limit is 15% support , if you got it, you will be included in the debates.
Why two is not enough ? How many political parties is enough ?
Who should decide that ?
People, of course, and that is the case in US. Anybody is free to start their own party and they do.
Everything else is in the hands of people.
"I get taxed 48% (yes, almost half) "
Heh. So if your goverment decides that 68% should be just about right for people like you , would you still feel "dandy fine" ?
Huh ?
Yeah, he apreciates he was able to make money that way, but since he is already set up for life, there is no reason to continue this "oppresive" practice.
"who presents a consistent view and actually has some credibility "
Give me a break. Nader made millions on technology stocks. He profited from 50+ h workweeks many geeks put in yet he is the one calling for 32 h workweek without salary cut.
One fucking credible fellow.
"A Bush election could mean the end of Roe v. Wade. "
Great. I am all for it.
Yeah, why would I wan't greens to win anywhere ?
Just for the sake of creating valid third party ?
Have you look at their program ?
Half of this comes streight from communist manifesto.
"Gore really is the lesser of two evils, at least as far as energy & environmental policy is concerned. Do you really think Dubya will do squat about extinctions, pollution & global warming (at least until it's far too late)?"
Why should he ? Just because bunch of wackos are making living scaring people about this crap ?
You got that right. Eventually Reagan will be remember as one of the greatest presidents in XX century.
It has not been ported to Windows. It runs when you have X server running which basically precludes 99% of Windows users.
Ha, so there you go.
Do you want gov people to decide how much is enough for you ?
(That what basically this "significance" amounts to )
Clinton was forced to sign this by Republican congress. Look at the timeline, he had 3 years to do so and nothing happened until congress was taken over by Reps.
You are one stupid Pole, you know. At least learn about your own history before making statements like that.
", but under his administration the deficit was eliminated and wages began to rise"
Yeah, was eliminated despite Clinton and his administration. It was republican Congress which forced that issue on him.
" Nader, Browne and Buchanan are all working for The People (or subsets thereof).
So did Lenin , what is your point ?
". Clinton/Gore also helped balance the budget and give priority to paying down the debt. "
...
That comment alone exposes your complete lack of knowledge about this issue
"like The Bell Curve ..."
Have you ever read that book ?