So would McAffee or Symantec be guilty of copyright circumvention if they provided protection against this theoretical RIAA MP3-destroying virus? I mean, under the DCMA, would it even be legal for people to defend themselves against this sort of nonsense?
Slashdot Mirror
So would McAffee or Symantec be guilty of copyright circumvention if they provided protection against this theoretical RIAA MP3-destroying virus? I mean, under the DCMA, would it even be legal for people to defend themselves against this sort of nonsense?