No, I'm just telling it like it is you sinner. You obviously are a masturbator and I'll see you burning in the sea of fire for your sins. There isn't room for everyone's oppinion on slashdot, just mine, not yours for sure.
In response to your question, NO. If the lead singer is bisexual then none of their songs can be posted. How hard is this to comprehend? If a person took drugs while recording an album, then we shouldn't have to listen to the second album, as they should have been in JAIL or EXECUTED if they were drug dealing. Yes the police should have been sent in, and as I don't believe that the police should ever have to use warrants, that would be fine too.
I apologise for the bad formatting, spelling and grammar of this post, I felt these points should be made quickly, and rather rushed this reply.
There are many, many evil things about Napster, but I'm only going to note a few:
1. It goes without saying that trading music without paying for it is wrong, but people who have said this before have only been marked down as trolls, so I'll leave that to others
2. Napster does not allow you any control over what music is available. For people who are producing music and want to give it away, this is a good utility, however, some rules should be in place No music by Gay bands/singers etc. No music advocating sex or masturbation of any kind No music advocating the use of, or recorded under the influence of, drugs
3. Napster allows you to create an accout without being completely certain who you are. All websites should have full details of all their users, so that if an offenc is committed, they can be found and prosecuted
Slashdot Mirror
No, I'm just telling it like it is you sinner. You obviously are a masturbator and I'll see you burning in the sea of fire for your sins. There isn't room for everyone's oppinion on slashdot, just mine, not yours for sure.
In response to your question, NO. If the lead singer is bisexual then none of their songs can be posted. How hard is this to comprehend? If a person took drugs while recording an album, then we shouldn't have to listen to the second album, as they should have been in JAIL or EXECUTED if they were drug dealing. Yes the police should have been sent in, and as I don't believe that the police should ever have to use warrants, that would be fine too.
I apologise for the bad formatting, spelling and grammar of this post, I felt these points should be made quickly, and rather rushed this reply.
There are many, many evil things about Napster, but I'm only going to note a few:
1. It goes without saying that trading music without paying for it is wrong, but people who have said this before have only been marked down as trolls, so I'll leave that to others
2. Napster does not allow you any control over what music is available. For people who are producing music and want to give it away, this is a good utility, however, some rules should be in place
No music by Gay bands/singers etc.
No music advocating sex or masturbation of any kind
No music advocating the use of, or recorded under the influence of, drugs
3. Napster allows you to create an accout without being completely certain who you are. All websites should have full details of all their users, so that if an offenc is committed, they can be found and prosecuted