I've always refused to get into the whole "name debate" thing. But doesn't it seem strange that they would call it "Darwin Linux" when the actual Linux kernel is conspicuously missing?
I know I'll sound like a dolt asking this, but if Mac OS-X is based on Mach and NetBSD, then what's with this "DarwinLinux" thing? I don't understand. I gather from the web page that they want to package a distribution of utilities and programs, but what does it have to do with Linux? Please enlighten me.
Slashdot Mirror
I've always refused to get into the whole "name debate" thing. But doesn't it seem strange that they would call it "Darwin Linux" when the actual Linux kernel is conspicuously missing?
Thanks for the info, BTW.
I know I'll sound like a dolt asking this, but if Mac OS-X is based on Mach and NetBSD, then what's with this "DarwinLinux" thing? I don't understand. I gather from the web page that they want to package a distribution of utilities and programs, but what does it have to do with Linux? Please enlighten me.