ok, we've hashed over the raw speed differences to death on this board. I would just like to say that after looking at the page for 3 seconds, I realized that the graphs were drawn by an idiot. http://www.adobe.com/motion/images/video_c omposite.gif Take a look, and see if you can tell what's wrong? As drawn: Dell P4 3.06 GHz: 54 seconds =.54 Dual G4 1.25 GHz: 1 minute 25 seconds = 1.25 In case you didn't catch it, go look at the labels on the graph & the axis, because here's what the real values equal: 54 seconds = 0.9 minutes 1' 25" = 1.4 minutes So, instead of a difference of 57% it should only be 35%. This does not mitigate the fact that the Pentium was faster, but rather than someone is making pains to make things look even worse then they are . . . . or (if I was feeling generous) that they are simply mathematically illiterate.
If you look at the first graph, as you point out, it compares 0:54 seconds vs. 1:25, but they just blindly did this: 0.54 vs. 1.25 This gave the Dell an advantage on the graph. But, in the second graph, it gets funnier. 2:05 vs. 3:47 becomes: (real) 125 sec vs. 227 seconds = Dell is 45% faster (Adobe) 2.5 vs. 3.47 = Dell is 28% "faster" So in their second graph, the Dell looks a lot slower than it actually is. I guess that evens out then. Whoever did that charge clearly forgot that 1.00 in "time" is sixty seconds, not 100 seconds.
after skimming it a bit more, the opening paragraph says that it was comparing "a 2.53GHz Pentium 4 and a 1GHz dual-processor G4", but the graphs are labeled with a "Dell P4 3.06GHz" and "Mac G4 dual 1.25GHz". So which is it?
Actually a VAT or sales tax would not be such a horrid idea, as long as the following exemptions were enforced on a national level:
Food
Clothing
Paper Products - Toilet Paper is a basic, folks!
Telecommunications - all of em, on the user end, mind you (still taxing calls for the damn Spanish American War)
Energy - electric and gas et al for home heating.
This way the poorer in our society, those who only have enough for the basics and necessities of life dont pay a higher amount of taxes.
Meanwhile, when Fred R. Billionaire buys his 23rd Mercedes, his share of the tax burden is paid for at the outset.
ok, we've hashed over the raw speed differences to death on this board. I would just like to say that after looking at the page for 3 seconds, I realized that the graphs were drawn by an idiot.c omposite .gif .54
http://www.adobe.com/motion/images/video_
Take a look, and see if you can tell what's wrong? As drawn:
Dell P4 3.06 GHz: 54 seconds =
Dual G4 1.25 GHz: 1 minute 25 seconds = 1.25
In case you didn't catch it, go look at the labels on the graph & the axis, because here's what the real values equal:
54 seconds = 0.9 minutes
1' 25" = 1.4 minutes
So, instead of a difference of 57% it should only be 35%.
This does not mitigate the fact that the Pentium was faster, but rather than someone is making pains to make things look even worse then they are . . . . or (if I was feeling generous) that they are simply mathematically illiterate.
If you look at the first graph, as you point out, it compares 0:54 seconds vs. 1:25, but they just blindly did this:
0.54 vs. 1.25
This gave the Dell an advantage on the graph.
But, in the second graph, it gets funnier. 2:05 vs. 3:47 becomes:
(real) 125 sec vs. 227 seconds = Dell is 45% faster
(Adobe) 2.5 vs. 3.47 = Dell is 28% "faster"
So in their second graph, the Dell looks a lot slower than it actually is. I guess that evens out then. Whoever did that charge clearly forgot that 1.00 in "time" is sixty seconds, not 100 seconds.
after skimming it a bit more, the opening paragraph says that it was comparing "a 2.53GHz Pentium 4 and a 1GHz dual-processor G4", but the graphs are labeled with a "Dell P4 3.06GHz" and "Mac G4 dual 1.25GHz". So which is it?
Actually a VAT or sales tax would not be such a horrid idea, as long as the following exemptions were enforced on a national level:
Food
Clothing
Paper Products - Toilet Paper is a basic, folks!
Telecommunications - all of em, on the user end, mind you (still taxing calls for the damn Spanish American War)
Energy - electric and gas et al for home heating.
This way the poorer in our society, those who only have enough for the basics and necessities of life dont pay a higher amount of taxes.
Meanwhile, when Fred R. Billionaire buys his 23rd Mercedes, his share of the tax burden is paid for at the outset.